clyde21 wrote:BostonCouchGM wrote:It's super early but my first impressions of this class are that it won't be as strong as 2017 or 2018 but similar to 2016 and 2019. So a very good draft in other words
'16 wasn't that good of a draft, i'd say it's step lower than '19 and '17 and two steps lower than '18.
still too early to say on '20 at this point, looks okay but nothing special.
Just because 2016 is weaker than arguably top 5 classes of all time (17 and 18) doesn't not mean it's a weak draft. Any draft where LeVert, Dejoute Murray, Siakam, Zubac and Brogdon are taken so late can't be weak. And it's not like there aren't good, potentially soon to be great players taken before them because there are: Simmons, Ingram, Brown, Murray, Hield, Sabonis, etc. I think people hear a narrative about something and just grudgingly stick to it despite evidence to the contrary. There are some definite high picks that turned out to be busts but total number of productive NBA starters from that class compares to any of the good drafts in NBA history. I will admit that it's mostly a complete bust in the 2nd round. It's not a very deep draft.