Yup. I think the Jo and Simmons connection will help.Arsenal wrote:If we lose Jimmy we MUST get D'Angelo Russell!
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Yup. I think the Jo and Simmons connection will help.Arsenal wrote:If we lose Jimmy we MUST get D'Angelo Russell!
nitocobola wrote:Imagine if tobias goes to the clippers, we will probably be the laughing stock for 10 years.
Elton clueless brand.
Arsenal wrote:There's no question Jimmy is going to leverage us against the Lakers whether he has any intention of going there or not. He'll force us to fork over the full 5 year MAX to keep him now for sure.
Mik317 wrote:we have not been linked to Russell at all.
Brogdon and Horford are apparently next in line.
Mik317 wrote:we have not been linked to Russell at all.
Brogdon and Horford are apparently next in line.
Arsenal wrote:The Lakers lack of depth is comical though. If they sign Jimmy, they'll have only 4 players under contract and will be out of cap room. They'll only have the Room Exception to sign a 3&D PG. Then they need to fill their rest of their team (7-10 roster spots) with vet mins only.
PG Room Ex | vet min | vet min
SG Butler | vet min | vet min
SF Shadow | vet min | vet min
PF Kuzma | vet min | vet min
CE Davis | vet min | vet min
They need to do massive load management for their top 3, but will have no depth to do so. I'm confident that they would have virtually no chance to win a title next year. The year after they'd have the MLE and BAE to add 2-3 bench pieces, so at that point they could be a legit contender.
stormi wrote:This is so entertaining. It's like the best movie i've ever watched
FreesFro wrote:Could Brogdon be more than a role player? Do we need more than a role player though? He won't be paid max will he?
50/40/90 is not too shabby.