NUCKER101 wrote:Jedi32 wrote:NUCKER101 wrote:It's fun to theorize but it really doesn't make much sense when you think about it.
Raps barely have any roster/cap flexibility anyway.
Clippers still had the money to re-sign Beverly and make a few other additions. They don't mind staying patient and keeping cap space open anyway since their end goal is to eventually land a couple of star players, either this summer or during a future summer.
Lakers are the ones who would be the ones that stand to lose the most since they would've turned to someone like Kemba or Dlo if Kawhi decided early on.
So the only way I could maybe buy this theory is if he ends up signing with LAC and basically puts a big dent in the Lakers free agency plans. The Clippers benefit from that a lot more than the Eastern Conference Raps.
This makes no sense. The Lakers aren't losing anything, they are playing with house money. The raps lose their top player who are they replacing him with? The clippers had a decent season last year but do people really believe that team can catch lightning in a bottle again? Gallo is injury prone while Beverly and Lou will sure lose a step. Also what stars outside of kawhi can the clippers realistically get this summer?
Look at the Raps cap/roster situation, they wouldn't be doing much in the FA market even if Kawhi told them he wasn't coming back before the 30th. Of course losing Kawhi is a massive blow, what I'm saying is that there off-season plan is hugely impacted by it because they barely have any flexibility either way.
You're telling me that the Lakers wouldn't have signed at least 1 or 2 of the players that are now off the market if Kawhi told them he wasn't interested in signing with them on June 30th?
Maybe, but I believe that kawhi was the plan all along. I just keep reading how the lakers are the biggest losers in this waiting game and I'm trying to figure out how is that possible when they already have bron/davis.



























