bearadonisdna wrote:Ccwatercraft wrote:Betta Bulleavit wrote:Wasn’t it just a few weeks ago where there was an article/interview with Zach where he talked at length about defense and how he wanted to become better as a help defender and how that would be a point of emphasis next season? He’s plenty aware. He just needs to get better. The bottom line is that some people just don’t like him as a player but they find it hard to really reason that. So they come up with unsubstantiated reasoning such as bbiq, not being a winner and other stuff because they can’t back up that he’s a poor player via core stats. That’s how I see it.
I recalled something along those lines about defense as well.
Zack has an amazing ability to get his own shot and his prime is ahead of him & team's only get a few opportunities to exploit top talent to produce wins.
Anyone suggesting that he is a lost cause with his faults is really selling him short. We have them for three more years minimum unless traded, enjoy it, hes good and can become great.
The surrounding cast for this next season should be a tremendous help as well.
Zach is currently the bulls best player.
he's not close to as good as porter
The negative analytics are annoying but it's typically the crutch when ppl want to dismiss traditonal stats.
nobody wants to dismiss traditional stats. that's ridiculous. people use advanced stats because they provide additional information. information is not a crutch. if used properly it helps you get off your crutches