alebaba wrote:People reading propaganda and thinking its facts.....Put up some real sources not some lame articles or just shut up about it...
Real sources?
You mean, like myself?
Okay, here we go:
Couple of years ago I did a 3-month internship for the German and English version of China Today in Beijing.
What we were not allowed to
mention let alone really write about:
- Tiananmen Square protests (mention it and you go to prison, period)
- anything freedom of speech related
- any comparisons between China and the West
- any suppresion of religious minorities
- any local/regional uproars that the military fought against (there are THOUSANDS every year)
- anything critical towards China
I studied political science at the time and actually tried to analyze the development of China in a neutral way. I suggested (in a draft of an article) that it would add to China's stability if they allowed freedom of speech instead of controlling it. You cannot imagine how my editor-in-chief looked at me reading the draft.
I wrote an article about a photographer who was also taking pictures of monks in Tibet and how beautiful those were - scratch that. Monks in Tibet? No, we can't write about them.
We had an article about suicide numbers in China and it was only allowed because it showed a positive development. Like, there have been 250k suicides last year but bc the government is uber great there were only 220k this year.
Every public or private newspaper/magazine suffers from direct censorship. But public magazines took it a step further and showed evey piss poor condition or development in a glorious way. People in Shanghai rely on welfare supermarkets to survive? Wow, how great is it that there a welfare supermarkets.
At the time I also found out that Google cooperates with the CCP to uncover dissidents.
What I was surprised about? That they were to dumb to follow me buying weed in front of the Worker's Stadium every Wednesday night. It was about the same price as in Europe and pretty good.