Fischella wrote:Nolley isn't a Guard man, he can't dribble
Besides the obvious hyperbole (he can attack close-outs and is still 19 years old, handles will develop) – if so, so what? Klay Thompson can't dribble (to use the hyperbole) and he's a Guard that everybody would love to have on their team. Hell, even if Klay couldn't put the ball on the floor at all he would be highly touted just because he is an elite shooter with solid size. I never said Nolley was supposed to handle the ball to create off the dribble, not every Guard/Wing needs to be able to do that reliably.
but no way he is athletic enough to play on the wing and has shown 0 aptitude to put the ball on the floor and do anything, needless to say, doesn't look great on D
I'm in the camp that if you have sufficient size and you're not a complete stiff, you can make it work in the NBA on defense as long as you're putting in the effort and play smart. Not saying you're going to be a good defender, of course, but you don't have to be a liability. Nolley has a lot of improvement left on his body, so we'll see where he ends up. But even with just a little added strength and consistent effort he shouldn't be a liability in the NBA if used correctly.
Also, I agree that he hasn't looked great on defense. But as you said yourself, he's playing in the role of a big man – I don't expect him to be totally comfortable in that role, he's just not a big. I also mentioned his usage rate; of course he's going to coast a bit on defense when he has to carry the offense. I have seen good defensive possessions played by him which gives me some confidence that he would look much better if he just had more energy to spend on that end. His defensive instincts aren't terrible, it's his effort that comes and goes.
Lastly, I would completely agree that casual fans often project prospects in college to play at the wing positions in the NBA when they are clearly not wing players (for instance, I have heard people say that McDaniels or Achiuwa are 3's when they clearly aren't; or people who still say that Giannis is a 3 which is just insane). But some of you seem drift in the opposite direction now and declare players 4's or 5's who could easily end up playing smaller positions in the NBA. I don't know, seems a bit like contrarianism just for the sake of it at times.