ImageImage

Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - CP3/Gallo trade idea pg.81

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,998
And1: 29,782
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1381 » by blazza18 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:07 am

I feel like we're good enough that we don't need to "improve" but also one of the reasons we lost in the playoffs last year is because a good part of the rotation came up small when it mattered most. I don't think it'd be terrible if we could potentially bring in a guy who is a proven commodity. That guy is probably not Robert Covington or JJ Redick though.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
ackypoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,543
And1: 3,358
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
 

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1382 » by ackypoo » Mon Dec 16, 2019 8:39 am

trading for someone to replace wes isnt a good look. thats not how you endear yourself to future ring chasers.
brettski
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 1,742
Joined: Aug 11, 2010
Location: Overseas

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1383 » by brettski » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:54 am

M-C-G wrote:
StickeeFingaz wrote:Subbing in RoCo instead of Pat/Sterling would be an upgrade. RoCo is a needle mover and could really help us win the championship.


Maybe but also how many 70 win paced teams didn’t make it to the finals?

How many didn’t win a championship?

I did not look this up so I may be setting myself up on this one but I think all the pieces are here we just need to be healthy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Considering this season two teams are on that pace.. at least one will not win a championship.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:Mark my words....Gooden will be this year's teams MVP. Watch and see.....


http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1139340&start=15&p=29252753&view=show#p29252753
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,527
And1: 9,854
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1384 » by M-C-G » Mon Dec 16, 2019 2:57 pm

brettski wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
StickeeFingaz wrote:Subbing in RoCo instead of Pat/Sterling would be an upgrade. RoCo is a needle mover and could really help us win the championship.


Maybe but also how many 70 win paced teams didn’t make it to the finals?

How many didn’t win a championship?

I did not look this up so I may be setting myself up on this one but I think all the pieces are here we just need to be healthy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Considering this season two teams are on that pace.. at least one will not win a championship.


oooof, that is depressing given the officiating will not be in our favor
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,834
And1: 8,228
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1385 » by jakecronus8 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 3:47 pm

Chatting with a buddy about the potential of adding Covington and now I’m livid all over again over the stupidity of not getting that TPE in the Brogdon deal. I don’t care how anyone tries to justify it. There is zero reason to not have it.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1386 » by Bernman » Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:25 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Chatting with a buddy about the potential of adding Covington and now I’m livid all over again over the stupidity of not getting that TPE in the Brogdon deal. I don’t care how anyone tries to justify it. There is zero reason to not have it.


It would mean they'd have to take on around 10 million in salary and multiply that when it comes to luxury tax. And they didn't want to do that even if they'd have theoretical flexibility. They'd much prefer this way of having to ship out close to comparable salaries. They'd add 2-3 but not 10.

P.S.: Don't shoot the messenger.
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,989
And1: 7,578
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1387 » by ShootingtheJ » Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:27 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Chatting with a buddy about the potential of adding Covington and now I’m livid all over again over the stupidity of not getting that TPE in the Brogdon deal. I don’t care how anyone tries to justify it. There is zero reason to not have it.


If it makes you feel any better, the TPE wouldn't have been big enough to get RoCo.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,834
And1: 8,228
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1388 » by jakecronus8 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:29 pm

Bernman wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Chatting with a buddy about the potential of adding Covington and now I’m livid all over again over the stupidity of not getting that TPE in the Brogdon deal. I don’t care how anyone tries to justify it. There is zero reason to not have it.


It would mean they'd have to take on around 10 million in salary and multiply that when it comes to luxury tax. And they didn't want to do that even if they'd have theoretical flexibility. They'd much prefer this way of having to ship out close to comparable salaries. They'd add 2-3 but not 10.

P.S.: Don't shoot the messenger.


No worries. I may be misinformed but if we had that TPE, wouldn’t we be able to something like Sterling, DJ, the Indy picks for RoCo and it would only add around 5 mil?

Regardless though. There was no competitive reason to not acquire that exception. All that said to me is the owners didn’t even want the option as there’s no way shape or form they’d entertain going into the lux.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Fresh_Prince12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,559
And1: 2,184
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1389 » by Fresh_Prince12 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 6:41 pm

Wonder what your thoughts would be on Terrence Ross? If we believe Dante can fill the PG position as Giannis and Khris would be the main ball handlers. Bledsoe would become expendable. Ross could be our Lou Will. Would the magic do straight up trade?
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,989
And1: 7,578
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1390 » by ShootingtheJ » Mon Dec 16, 2019 6:53 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:
Bernman wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Chatting with a buddy about the potential of adding Covington and now I’m livid all over again over the stupidity of not getting that TPE in the Brogdon deal. I don’t care how anyone tries to justify it. There is zero reason to not have it.


It would mean they'd have to take on around 10 million in salary and multiply that when it comes to luxury tax. And they didn't want to do that even if they'd have theoretical flexibility. They'd much prefer this way of having to ship out close to comparable salaries. They'd add 2-3 but not 10.

P.S.: Don't shoot the messenger.


No worries. I may be misinformed but if we had that TPE, wouldn’t we be able to something like Sterling, DJ, the Indy picks for RoCo and it would only add around 5 mil?

Regardless though. There was no competitive reason to not acquire that exception. All that said to me is the owners didn’t even want the option as there’s no way shape or form they’d entertain going into the lux.


Sorry, but you can't aggregate the TPE like that. If we had the TPE , we'd be able to use it only on players with salaries of $10 million or less.

You're still right to be annoyed by the lack of a TPE though.
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,292
And1: 4,609
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1391 » by raferfenix » Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:25 pm

How much of an upgrade would Covington be over Ersan in Bud's system?

On the one hand, he's an ideal kind of 3&D player under 30 on a fair contract for years to come.

On the other, he's had enough injuries to give pause, and we'd need to trade Ersan or a variety of other role players to open space for him, either of which would cause roster instability.

Basically if RoCo wouldn't have a George Hill style resurgence here it wouldn't be worth dealing the Pacers pick.

And even then we'd be dealing one of our very few easily-tradeable assets for a really good bench guy.
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,325
And1: 3,784
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1392 » by tski1972 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:27 pm

this thread is more fun when the Bucks stink.

ride the wave, keep the chemistry, hold on to your assets.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,077
And1: 4,203
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1393 » by DanoMac » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:01 pm

User avatar
IrishRainbow
Veteran
Posts: 2,860
And1: 929
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: @ the drawing table
     

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1394 » by IrishRainbow » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:16 pm

DanoMac wrote:Middleton in top 10 for MVP--

https://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/mvp.html
Dont let the GB MVP thread get wind of this.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
LuessiT
RealGM
Posts: 11,476
And1: 4,736
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1395 » by LuessiT » Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:36 am

DanoMac wrote:Middleton in top 10 for MVP--

https://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/mvp.html


It heavily favors winning percentage which makes sense for the best player on best tean but not so much for the second best player on the best team By the way if Brook gets his **** together on offense he could realistically make the allstar game. There aren't that many centers that are above him.
LuessiT
RealGM
Posts: 11,476
And1: 4,736
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1396 » by LuessiT » Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:17 pm

We need to talk about Lopez. Not Robin. The other Lopez. He's been bad this year. Not only on offense but occasionally on defense. We just handed him a 4 year deal which looked like a solid number but could turn sour real quick. Also I'm still convinced Giannis best position is ultimately at center.
I'm wondering if we should consider flipping him (though the optics would be very bad).
User avatar
tedbrogen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,331
And1: 3,834
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1397 » by tedbrogen » Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:34 pm

LuessiT wrote:We need to talk about Lopez. Not Robin. The other Lopez. He's been bad this year. Not only on offense but occasionally on defense. We just handed him a 4 year deal which looked like a solid number but could turn sour real quick. Also I'm still convinced Giannis best position is ultimately at center.
I'm wondering if we should consider flipping him (though the optics would be very bad).


The defense is built around him anchoring the middle. His effect on team rebounding is huge. He has been awful on offense at times, but he has definitely shown he is a way better three point shooter over the past few seasons than he has been thus far this year. So, he likely will shoot better the rest of the way. He went through cold streaks last year too. When he clearly doesn't have it and the other team forces a switching defense, Bud does sit him.

Missing Bledsoe really exposes the drop zone defense because Bledsoe is elite at fighting over screens and challenging from behind.
LuessiT
RealGM
Posts: 11,476
And1: 4,736
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1398 » by LuessiT » Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:40 pm

tedbrogen wrote:
LuessiT wrote:We need to talk about Lopez. Not Robin. The other Lopez. He's been bad this year. Not only on offense but occasionally on defense. We just handed him a 4 year deal which looked like a solid number but could turn sour real quick. Also I'm still convinced Giannis best position is ultimately at center.
I'm wondering if we should consider flipping him (though the optics would be very bad).


The defense is built around him anchoring the middle. His effect on team rebounding is huge. He has been awful on offense at times, but he has definitely shown he is a way better three point shooter over the past few seasons than he has been thus far this year. So, he likely will shoot better the rest of the way. He went through cold streaks last year too. When he clearly doesn't have it and the other team forces a switching defense, Bud does sit him.

Missing Bledsoe really exposes the drop zone defense because Bledsoe is elite at fighting over screens and challenging from behind.


Imo Giannis could anchor the defense just as well inside (if not better) and wouldn't be a liability when forced to hedge on screens. It's worth having a discussion about.
User avatar
machu46
RealGM
Posts: 11,060
And1: 4,392
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: DC
       

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1399 » by machu46 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:16 pm

LuessiT wrote:
tedbrogen wrote:
LuessiT wrote:We need to talk about Lopez. Not Robin. The other Lopez. He's been bad this year. Not only on offense but occasionally on defense. We just handed him a 4 year deal which looked like a solid number but could turn sour real quick. Also I'm still convinced Giannis best position is ultimately at center.
I'm wondering if we should consider flipping him (though the optics would be very bad).


The defense is built around him anchoring the middle. His effect on team rebounding is huge. He has been awful on offense at times, but he has definitely shown he is a way better three point shooter over the past few seasons than he has been thus far this year. So, he likely will shoot better the rest of the way. He went through cold streaks last year too. When he clearly doesn't have it and the other team forces a switching defense, Bud does sit him.

Missing Bledsoe really exposes the drop zone defense because Bledsoe is elite at fighting over screens and challenging from behind.


Imo Giannis could anchor the defense just as well inside (if not better) and wouldn't be a liability when forced to hedge on screens. It's worth having a discussion about.


I think the key is that Bud might not want Giannis to be the anchor; I think he likes having Giannis as a disruptive roamer.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,311
And1: 7,455
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Bucks News, Trades, Transactions - Hollinger/Duncan rate organization, pg 40 

Post#1400 » by coolhandluke121 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:47 pm

LuessiT wrote:We need to talk about Lopez. Not Robin. The other Lopez. He's been bad this year. Not only on offense but occasionally on defense. We just handed him a 4 year deal which looked like a solid number but could turn sour real quick.


I think it was sour from the beginning. You have to remember that paying him more than the MLE was the only reason for all those crazy financial gymnastics they pulled in free agency. They didn't have to create cap room, pull Brogdon's QO as part of the trade, waive/re-sign Hill, settle for the room MLE, or even kick the can down the road with Leuer's contract, which could have had value as an expiring.

Maybe BroLo would have signed some type of 4/$60m deal with a loser like the Knicks or Kings, but I would have taken that chance, unless I had reason to believe Giannis would be furious. I think they could have either kept BroLo or replaced him adequately with the full MLE though.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks