Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#21 » by Old Man Game » Wed Jan 1, 2020 3:46 am

That's a really solid win right there. Great job by the guys sticking it out to come back late in that fourth quarter. Big props to Chris Paul in that.

And Luka Doncic my Lord. I honestly can't remember seeing a guy at that age not named LeBron James who had that sort of feel for the game.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#22 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jan 1, 2020 3:50 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:How good would this team be with a Joe ingles or even justice Winslow starting at sf


How good would this team be with Iggy? Unlike those other two you mentioned the Thunder have the assets to make it happen without disrupting their core. Go get him.

Iguadola is making over 17 million dollars and is not good. You'd have to trade roberson, fergusonz and bazley just to make it work and would still be taking on salary plus adding tax.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Atomic Punk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 03, 2017
Location: Earth

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#23 » by Atomic Punk » Wed Jan 1, 2020 3:52 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:How good would this team be with a Joe ingles or even justice Winslow starting at sf


How good would this team be with Iggy? Unlike those other two you mentioned the Thunder have the assets to make it happen without disrupting their core. Go get him.

Iguadola is making over 17 million dollars and is not good. You'd have to trade roberson, fergusonz and bazley just to make it work and would still be taking on salary plus adding tax.


Roberson, Burton, and Nader would work too. You wouldn’t do that trade? Iggy still has something left in the tank. And if Ferguson had to go, so be it.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#24 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jan 1, 2020 3:56 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
How good would this team be with Iggy? Unlike those other two you mentioned the Thunder have the assets to make it happen without disrupting their core. Go get him.

Iguadola is making over 17 million dollars and is not good. You'd have to trade roberson, fergusonz and bazley just to make it work and would still be taking on salary plus adding tax.


Roberson, Burton, and Nader would work too. You wouldn’t do that trade? Iggy still has something left in the tank. And if Ferguson had to go, so be it.

Roberson/nader/burton doesn't send out enough salary. And even if it did, and Memphis thought that was enticing for since reason, no I wouldn't pay something like 30 million in salary plus tax for iguadola.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,486
And1: 22,251
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#25 » by Revived » Wed Jan 1, 2020 3:59 am

This Thunder team is better than any of the Thunder teams since KD left.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#26 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jan 1, 2020 4:01 am

Revived wrote:This Thunder team is better than any of the Thunder teams since KD left.

Lol
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#27 » by Old Man Game » Wed Jan 1, 2020 4:03 am

I'm not sure if this is true or not but I will say this, I find them really easy to watch and root for. There's a lot of fun personalities on this team and they seem to try hard every night.

The RussPG Thunder teams just complained about every call by every official and it got really grating after a while.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app
Atomic Punk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 03, 2017
Location: Earth

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#28 » by Atomic Punk » Wed Jan 1, 2020 4:04 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Revived wrote:This Thunder team is better than any of the Thunder teams since KD left.

Lol


It’s not?
Atomic Punk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 03, 2017
Location: Earth

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#29 » by Atomic Punk » Wed Jan 1, 2020 4:06 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Iguadola is making over 17 million dollars and is not good. You'd have to trade roberson, fergusonz and bazley just to make it work and would still be taking on salary plus adding tax.


Roberson, Burton, and Nader would work too. You wouldn’t do that trade? Iggy still has something left in the tank. And if Ferguson had to go, so be it.

Roberson/nader/burton doesn't send out enough salary. And even if it did, and Memphis thought that was enticing for since reason, no I wouldn't pay something like 30 million in salary plus tax for iguadola.


So throw in Muscalla and Ferguson. It still makes them better this year and gets them in the playoffs. A competitive first round out is far more valuable for this franchise this year than missing out on the playoffs altogether.
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#30 » by Old Man Game » Wed Jan 1, 2020 4:09 am

Whatever happens with Terrance, please for the love of God, let him hit restricted free agency if he's still here. Let the market set value. No reason to bargain against yourself in this instance.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
1bigfan13
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 903
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#31 » by 1bigfan13 » Wed Jan 1, 2020 6:27 am

Old Man Game wrote:Whatever happens with Terrance, please for the love of God, let him hit restricted free agency if he's still here. Let the market set value. No reason to bargain against yourself in this instance.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app

I'd go a step further. Just let him walk and don't even attempt to re-sign him.

We don't need players like him anymore. You can't win in today's game with a starting wing who gives you damn near nothing on the offensive end on a nightly basis. That formula does not work.
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#32 » by Dn4sty » Wed Jan 1, 2020 6:46 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
Roberson, Burton, and Nader would work too. You wouldn’t do that trade? Iggy still has something left in the tank. And if Ferguson had to go, so be it.

Roberson/nader/burton doesn't send out enough salary. And even if it did, and Memphis thought that was enticing for since reason, no I wouldn't pay something like 30 million in salary plus tax for iguadola.


So throw in Muscalla and Ferguson. It still makes them better this year and gets them in the playoffs. A competitive first round out is far more valuable for this franchise this year than missing out on the playoffs altogether.


You can’t do a 5 for 1 trade at the deadline. Roster spots would kill it. This trade doesn’t make sense at all
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#33 » by NaturalThunder » Wed Jan 1, 2020 8:19 am

Terrence Ferguson's last 10 games (MIN, PTS, FGA/FGM, 3PA/3PM, FTA/FTM, +/-)

at NOP: 30 min, 3 pts, 1/5 FG, 1/5 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. IND: 32 min, 8 pts, 3/7 FG, 2/6 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. CHI: 29 min, 12 pts, 4/7 FG, 4/7 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. MEM: 26 min, 3 pts, 1/3 FG, 1/3 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. PHX: 19, min, 3 pts, 1/2 FG, 1/2 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. LAC: 29 min, 0 pts, 0/4 FG, 0/4 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. MEM: 35 min, 6 pts, 2/6 FG, 2/6 3P, 0/0 FT
at CHA: 29 min, 0 pts, 0/3 FG, 0/3 3P, 0/0 FT
at TOR: 36 min, 0 pts, 0/5 FG, 0/5 3P, 0/0 FT
vs. DAL: 18 min, 0 pts, 0/3 FG, 0/3 3P, 0/0 FT

AVERAGES: 28.3 MPG, 3.5 PPG, 26.7% FG (12/45), 25% 3P (11/44), 0% FT (0/0)


If you really look at and think about those numbers over the last 10 games for Ferguson, it truly is mind-boggling. He playing nearly 30 minutes per bleeping game and he hasn't stepped to the FT line since November! He's attempted 45 FGs in this 10 game stretch, and only one of them has been a 2-point field-goal attempt! That'd be great if he was a good to great 3P shooter, but he's shooting a TERRIBLE 25% from three over the last 10 games and 31.6% for the season...clearly he's a terrible 3P shooter!

Now, I'll admit I haven't watched enough games this year, or paid close enough attention to advanced stats to know....but is his defense really good? I can't think of a reason at this point why he deserves to even sniff the floor, never mind playing 28 minutes per game.

We use to complain about Thabo and Roberson, and how bad they were offensively, but Ferguson is nowhere near as good as Thabo or Robes.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
QPR
Analyst
Posts: 3,205
And1: 4,388
Joined: Mar 02, 2011

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#34 » by QPR » Wed Jan 1, 2020 9:15 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Revived wrote:This Thunder team is better than any of the Thunder teams since KD left.

Lol


It’s not?


I feel like you're confusing "better" with "more enjoyable".
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#35 » by Pillendreher » Wed Jan 1, 2020 10:22 am

NaturalThunder wrote:Yeah, Ferguson is awful. At this point I've about decided it'd be a major accomplishment if he ever becomes a semi-serviceable NBA player. He sure as hell shouldn't be starting for an NBA team.


It's incredible that they have started him 112 times already and nobody cares at all that he's just not even close to NBA starter level. It's like "He's from Tulsa" is enough.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
QPR
Analyst
Posts: 3,205
And1: 4,388
Joined: Mar 02, 2011

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#36 » by QPR » Wed Jan 1, 2020 10:57 am

The Presti blueprint always involves at least one "defensive specialist" starting and playing 30 minutes, despite contributing nothing offensively.

Tends to work better when you also have two of Durant/Westbrook/George in your starting five though.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#37 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jan 1, 2020 11:04 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Revived wrote:This Thunder team is better than any of the Thunder teams since KD left.

Lol


It’s not?

The fact that we're all ecstatic about an 18-15 record speaks volumes. It's the worst team we've had since 2009, and that includes the Westbrook do what I want year
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#38 » by ThunderBolt » Wed Jan 1, 2020 11:23 am

QPR wrote:The Presti blueprint always involves at least one "defensive specialist" starting and playing 30 minutes, despite contributing nothing offensively.

Tends to work better when you also have two of Durant/Westbrook/George in your starting five though.

And if your defensive specialist is you know, good at defense.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#39 » by sleestak33 » Wed Jan 1, 2020 12:56 pm

It looks like people are finally starting to figure out what I've been saying for several years now about Ferguson...he's simply not an NBA caliber starter and Sam Presti needs to completely blow up this model that he brought from San Antonio for the starting wing player that's good on defense but sucks on offense. I've watched it for a decade now and it simply doesn't work, especially in today's NBA which puts a premium on shooting and scoring, specifically from your starting SG and SF. I frankly don't know that Ferguson is a legit NBA player who will remain in the league at this point because he's so inept offensively and they're fricking starting him and playing him almost 30 minutes. I have to say I really enjoy watching this team play other than having to suffer through watching Ferguson muck things up because they really play team ball and CP and SGA are as good a starting backcourt as there is in the league. I hate to say it but it's kind of an indictment on Russ when you watch how much better the team operates with CP and how much better he is at closing games out with better decision making. It's just a much better brand of basketball we're watching now and Donovan is proving that he's actually a really good schematic coach when guys follow his gameplan.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,561
And1: 6,820
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Game 33: Dallas Mavericks (21-11) @ Oklahoma City Thunder (17-15) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#40 » by slick_watts » Wed Jan 1, 2020 3:55 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Lol


It’s not?

The fact that we're all ecstatic about an 18-15 record speaks volumes. It's the worst team we've had since 2009, and that includes the Westbrook do what I want year


we're 18-15, about 1.3 SRS with chris paul not missing any games. most of the low/mid 30 wins projections anticipated trades and gallinari / paul playing 3/4 of a season. we've had relatively great health from them so far.

the team is fun because expectations are gone. and of course most thunder fans prefer being plucky underdogs. the opportunity to construct an us v. them narrative has been taken and exploited. this team isn't playing any better than i expected given the health of cp3 and gallinari. i hope that this groundswell of support for making the playoffs or whatever (or, god forbid, being buyers at the deadline) doesn't get in the way of extracting value from our veterans at the deadline if possible.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder