GEOLINK wrote:
Holy sh*t, this is beyond awesome.
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
GEOLINK wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:Presti also traded Allen and Harden for basically nothing. You think he would have survived NY? But he's been with Sonics/Thunder about 10 years now and is still rebuilding. His first act was trading Ray Allen and Glen Davis for Wally, Jeff Green and Delonte West and gifting Boston a championship.cgmw wrote:prophet_of_rage wrote:Presti traded for Melo? Lost KD for nothing. Had to break up KD, Russ, Harden and Ibaka. Took on Nerlens Noel. He's done a lot of bad, too.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
And yet tiny little San Antonio and OKC have run rings around our two-bit Gotham organization for decades.
Maybe he’s just lucky, but SGA, CP3, Gallo, Schroeder, and Adams look like they actually fit together and will elevate SGA to levels of stardom previously thought unattainable.
Oh and they own like a million draft picks. Yes, I’m envious. OKC has the kind of team Mills thought he was putting together here.
RC Buford has been GM of the Spurs for a generation and has the Tim Duncan draft to hang his success on.
Percy's been our GM 2 years and you want him fired.
See the problem? Nobody gets any traction here to do a damned thing. Good or bad.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
Red Vines wrote:I really don't know how more years like this a fan can possibly take...absolutely depressing.
god shammgod wrote:
offense wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Context wrote:yall are too emotional- this is a **** rebuild
when you get into a fight with a bully - you gonna get a beat down and everything is going to look out of wack....
we have "rebouding" since 2000
No we haven't. They always traded for some "star" and traded what few young players they had.
thebuzzardman wrote:BugginOut wrote:Lol
Bullock, Payton, Trier, Dotson, Ellington, Gibson combined for 1-28 from the field
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
god shammgod wrote:
well damn. i thought it would not be anytime soon. sounds like it might.
thebuzzardman wrote:GEOLINK wrote:
Holy sh*t, this is beyond awesome.
GEOLINK wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:RJ was the only one worth watching. Good to see him play with effort even though the team was getting demolished.
True help is coming youngin, no more Julius randles either. real talent.
Context wrote:god shammgod wrote:
yup...**** is jumping off Mitch boat...ok...
Now his IQ is low...Maybe his IQ is bi polar....
BowlRips wrote:Are they still trying to save face?
The signings didn’t work out. Except for the fact that you Randle/Portis/Morris was redundant, I was able to at least rationalize what they were doing.
But now that your 10-31, don’t you think it’s time for a change?
Can’t you see that these vets are serving no purpose right now? Only taking away minutes from the prospects and creating clunky lineups that limit the progression of the young players?
They don’t even realize what is good for them. The fan base would RELISH seeing our young players playing together 30 mins a night.
And it’s crazy that for all the misfits they signed, the young core actually has a nice fit together!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
god shammgod wrote:it is amazing that half the season is over and dennis smith jr has basically done nothing yet. not a thing.
thebuzzardman wrote:god shammgod wrote:prophet_of_rage wrote:I said last year imagine Mitch with a jumper and was told to leave him alone he was fine as he was. Now he needs to shoot.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
it takes time. it took giannis 7 seasons.
Wingo doesn't have that much time!
mpharris36 wrote:aq_ua wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
is that why steve mills is still employed? All that great between the lines and behind the scenes stuff he has done for the knicks organization?
It's a fair question to ask - what is the sufficient amount of time for a GM or President to have to prove their plan is either right or wrong. In the last 20 years, we've given GMs an average of 3 years, with Layden the longest tenured at 5 years. A team like Boston with a long history of continuity and tradition has had 2 GMs in the past 20 years. That includes 10 years of Chris Wallace, who made a lot of questionable moves during his tenure but seems to have found redemption in Memphis. So, let's have it. What's the right amount of time you allow a front office to execute a vision.
there is no specific amount of time. It's a lack of understanding the vision. Once there is no plan/vision/identity/improvement...you get fired.
Deeeez Knicks wrote:This is Mills 7th season as GM/president. This will be our 7th season in the lottery, we traded a young all-star in KP, we had $70+mil in cap space.
We really should have a lot more to show for all of this. Mills has no business running a basketball team.