M-C-G wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:M-C-G wrote:
Most definitely he is THE problem. You can reference his TD:INT ratio, but I know you are a skilled enough fan to see the drive killing plays where he takes sacks, he extends plays that result in holding, and he throws the ball where no one has a chance to make the catch.
I understand this is a very unconventional opinion but I see what I see, and the rest of you will too if Rodgers doesn't grow next year.
I don't think anyone is going to argue that Rodgers has taken a turn in his career due to age or whatever but these are the worst takes ever for one reason:
Go out on a tougher limb than basically saying, "if we don't win the Super Bowl, I'm right." Because that's basically what you've set up here.
I'm not understanding your point, so maybe you aren't understanding mine. Let me try again, Rodgers is an ELITE TALENT, particularly with regard to TD:INT ratio. I am saying despite this fact, he is holding this team back and we had a 13-3 record in spite of him.
I don't know how much further of a limb I can got out on than that. Doesn't bother me if other people don't see it yet, but we should have either gone the route of Tennessee or San Fran a year ago, or Rodgers should have bought into the system, which to even the most casual of fans, they seem to see he has not.
I don't know, the team went 13-3 and was a game away from the Super Bowl (in spite of the quarterback, apparently) so the problem is that "you will too if Rodgers doesn't grow next year" means that the Packers could once again win 13 games and nearly win the Super Bowl but you'd be right that the Hall of Fame QB is bad and holding the team back.