Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

TimRobbins
General Manager
Posts: 8,200
And1: 2,279
Joined: Nov 15, 2014

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#701 » by TimRobbins » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:28 am

GordanFreeman wrote:So you’re going to prematurely blame the pilot but you’ll apologize if evidence comes out that it was a mechanical issue that caused the crash? I don’t know, that doesn’t seem right to me tbh.


I'll be the first one to apologize if it turns out to be mechanical failure, but all evidence so far suggests otherwise.
Castle Black
Head Coach
Posts: 6,855
And1: 17,750
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
       

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#702 » by Castle Black » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:30 am

Still doesn’t feel real to me. Can’t believe Kobe’s really gone man. This sucks.
Image
User avatar
wilhelmthe1st
Pro Prospect
Posts: 839
And1: 178
Joined: Jun 18, 2010

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#703 » by wilhelmthe1st » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:32 am

Read on Twitter
?s=21

:no:
First Take
Senior
Posts: 554
And1: 414
Joined: Aug 04, 2019

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#704 » by First Take » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:34 am

Man I am honestly so sad this had to have happened.
Drygon
Veteran
Posts: 2,968
And1: 5,216
Joined: Dec 18, 2018

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#705 » by Drygon » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:35 am



I just saw an amazing breakdown on /r/nba by someone who's a pilot himself

https://old.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/ev0ji5/helicopter_sikorsky_crashes_north_of_los_angeles/


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(I know this is probably a repost (video/audio of ATC) but I wanted to give some explanation to the video after I shared it with my family members and they were confused on some of the terminology that ATC and the pilot are using in the video. I will break it down in intervals and add some insight into the pilots possible thought process.)

My background: Naval helicopter pilot that has flown in the southern California area for close to 6 years and roughly 1,500 hours of pilot time. I have flown the route that the helicopter was on during the mishap a few times and can speak to the dangers of a marine layer and the possible spatial disorientation it can cause from personal experience.


Some ATC definitions, LA airspace and common aviation parlance.


IFR: Instrument flight rules- Operations in weather that does not allow the aviator to guarantee separation on a see and avoid principle. Requires an instrument rated pilot, a transponder for radar following and a two way radio to operate in. In general, if weather falls below 1000 feet of ceiling for cloud clearance (from the ground to the bottoms of the clouds) and/or less than 3 miles of visibility, IFR must be used..

VFR: Visual flight rules- Operations that allow for a see and avoid principle. Can vary for different types of airspaces around airports, but typically when weather has greater than 1000 feet of ceiling for cloud clearance and greater than 3 miles of visibility.

SVFR: Special VFR (for helicopters) - operating under visual specific weather minimums allow helicopters, because they are slower and easier to maneuver around weather, that says you can operate within an airports airspace as long as you can maintain clear of clouds and 1 mile of visibility. If you want to transit through an airports controlled airspace during weather below VFR minimums, you need to request SVFR.

- The LA airspace is one of the busiest in the country, if not the world. Outside of LAX's Class B (biggest airports), you have multiple other B, C (smaller, still pretty big), and D (smaller, still towered) airports within 50 miles that dot the landscape. Burbank airport (class C) and Van Nuys (class D) airport are northwest of downtown and have specific helicopter routes that allow you to transition through the airspaces, most navigating along highways at prescribed altitudes that allow helicopters to operate within controlled airspace (usually 4000 feet and below within 10 miles of airports) without disrupting other fixed wing traffic.

- The communications you hear in the video are between the helicopter (callsign: 2EX, Two- Echo-Xray) and the control towers of those two airspaces. 2EX is attempting to transit from the southeast to the northwest through these airspaces.


The video:


0:30 - 0:35 - (1021 AM Local time) 2EX has called Burbank Tower (not heard) and Burbank Tower responds with the information about the field. He tells 2EX that the field is IFR, the altimeter setting (barometric pressure that pilot sets to reference altitude on a barometric altimeter) and asks for his intentions (how he plans to proceed as he is not currently under an instrument clearance to proceed to the airport).

0:36-0:42 - (1021 AM Local time) 2EX responds that he wants to proceed westbound to pick up the 101 Freeway and proceed SVFR through the airports airspace. The pilot needs to ask for permission to do this because it means he intends to operate VFR even though the field is IFR.

0:42-0:50 - (1021 AM Local time) Burbank Tower tells 2EX to hold outside the airspace because he has an inbound aircraft that needs to go around on an approach and he needs to maintain separation for that aircraft so it can safely waveoff their approach and set up for another approach. It is unclear why this other aircraft is waving off but can somewhat be safely assumed the weather is a factor. 2EX agrees to hold outside the tower's airspace, which you can see he does with the small graphic doing circles on the screen as the video fast forwards for around 10 minutes.

0:50 (1021 AM Local time) The screen flashes the METAR (Meteorological Terminal Aviation Routine Weather Report), essentially, the current weather in coded format. Of note- it says the visibility is 2 1/2 miles, HZ (Haze), and ceilings are 1100 overcast (which is above 95% sky coverage, so pretty much complete). It does not say how thick that cloud layer is.

0:50-1:30 (1021-1032 AM Local time) Burbank town tells 2EX that they will need to continue holding as the aircraft that they have another aircraft on approach and the aircraft that just waved off needing to sequence in before they can clear 2EX through the airspace. 2EX acknowledges to continue holding and is then given instructions on what they can expect after those aircraft are clear.

1:30-2:05 (1032 -1033 AM Local time) Burbank tower makes a call to another aircraft to help out 2EX to get going as they have been holding for awhile now. He clears 2EX north along the 5 HWY (runs southeast to northwest) through the airspace using SVFR and at or below 2500 feet MSL (altitude in mean sea level). 2EX acknowledges and proceeds through the airspace.

- A quick aside. At this point, it is unclear how bad the weather is or if 2EX is actually maintaining SVFR rules or if the haze is making the visibility less that SVFR minimums. From my personal experience navigating in the marine layer a good amount over the past 6 years, it has varying levels of severity.

2:05-2:45 (1032-1037 AM Local time) Burbank tower gives 2EX the option of proceeding along the 118 Freeway and then rejoining the 5 as it heads toward Van Nuys airport's airspace. 2EX follows that route and checks in with Van Nuys Tower, telling the controller he is operating under SVFR and is at 1400' feet MSL.

2:45-3:21 (1037 AM Local time) Burbank tower clears 2EX through Van Nuys airspace and gives a similar weather report to Burbank tower. She also advises them to transit below 2500 feet MSL and to advise when they are VFR or when clear of the Van Nuys airspace to the west. 2EX acknowledges the instructions.

3:22-3:52 (1037-1039 AM Local time) Van Nuys Tower asks if they would like to contact So Cal (Souther California) approach when they are clear of the airspace to which 2EX responds in the affirmative. 2EX then asks if they can turn west toward the 101 as they are clear of the Van Nuys class D airspace to which she responds affirmative and asks if they are in VFR conditions to which 2EX says yes they are at 1500 feet MSL. Van Nuys Tower checks off with 2EX saying they can check in with So Cal Approach for flight following (a form of continued radar services while maintaining VFR provided because the approach controllers have radar coverage in the area)

3:52-4:24 (1039-1043 AM Local time) The video speeds up as the display indicates 2EX is turning south. At this point the only voice communication heard is So Cal approach asking 2EX if they are looking for flight following and to say their intentions as it seems they are veering off of 101 as previously intended. When the radar contact disappears, the last call was that 2EX was too low for flight following.


Some final thoughts:


1. I do not do any of this analysis to pass judgement on the pilot heard in the video. It is rare that helicopter aviation is in the spot light like this and I just wanted to provide some context for what was happening. I have the deepest sympathies for the pilot, the passengers in the mishap and their loved ones.

2. Vertigo is a term you may hear that the pilot had during this mishap. Think of vertigo as being instantly drunk and unable to have your brain communicate function to your body. It can occur when you encounter clouds when you are not expecting it or believe that the horizon that you are referencing while flying is there when in reality it is not. I can see how that is confusing and there are many youtube videos that can show the effects of veritgo on pilots.

3. I have had incapacitating vertigo once while flying my helicopter and it was the scariest moment of my life. It was like nothing I have experienced before while flying and hope to never experience again. My motor functions and brain connection basically became disconnected and I was unable to tell if the aircraft was climbing / descending / turning / straight. It was at night and I went into the clouds at an area I was extremely familiar with. I was complacent to the mission I was conducting because I had done it so often and it nearly cost me my own life and the lives of 4 other people that night. I was saved by my copilot and his ability to use his training to get us back straight and level and talk me back onto the instrumentation.

4. I do not know if this pilot had vertigo or simply lost control of the aircraft. The bad weather, his intention to turn to the west and sudden departure to out of control flight (a climb to above 2000+ feet MSL and ultimately crash landing at 4000 feet per minute rate of descent) are indicators that some kind of spatial disorientation may have been a factor.

Long post, hope it was helpful if you were looking for some analysis on the recording.
User avatar
goodboy
RealGM
Posts: 46,514
And1: 185,344
Joined: Aug 07, 2014
Location: disposal japanese worker
 

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#706 » by goodboy » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:37 am

Nowascki wrote:I hate to be the person talking about this,
Spoiler:
but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace
.

yeah, we all do.
Bright
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,770
And1: 44,026
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#707 » by zimpy27 » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:42 am

rewill17 wrote:ImageImage


Photos like this really show how young he was and how old the other past legends of the NBA are in comparison. They are one or two generations older. Way too young.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,841
And1: 19,334
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#708 » by Pharmcat » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:49 am

TimRobbins wrote:
GordanFreeman wrote:So you’re going to prematurely blame the pilot but you’ll apologize if evidence comes out that it was a mechanical issue that caused the crash? I don’t know, that doesn’t seem right to me tbh.


I'll be the first one to apologize if it turns out to be mechanical failure, but all evidence so far suggests otherwise.


The chance of a catostrophic mechanical issue happening in the last couple mins of flight is low considering he was fine when talking to atc and the chopper is a solid build. It looks to be weather related and pilot error of forgetting hills can be left and right of you (not just straight ahead) or spatial disorientation messing up the pilot. I'd be very surprised if it was something else than weather and pilot error.
Image
Drygon
Veteran
Posts: 2,968
And1: 5,216
Joined: Dec 18, 2018

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#709 » by Drygon » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:49 am

Jazztop wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Suppe wrote:
Kind of corny to do it on Twitter and do it now. Perkins is a (Please Use More Appropriate Word)


Perk is such a weasel

Srsly? Tragedies can bring out the best and most vulnerable and compassionate traits in people. I probably wouldn’t have tweeted publicly but their feud was made public so I guess he figured he’d try to mend it publicly.

Cut the guy some slack.


“I’m sorry for whatever I did” is not owning up to anything. Perk literally dragged KD’s name through the mud to get himself a media gig. Used their friendship to promote his bad takes on live tv & give them credibility.

And now he is using Kobe's tragic death to get himself more attention from fans & the media. I really don’t see why he couldn’t just send a private message to KD first and have an actual conversation with him about it. Then if they want to put it out there that they made amends, so be it. Now Perk is putting KD in a position where he'll be crapped if he doesn't respond publicly.
User avatar
picc
RealGM
Posts: 19,586
And1: 21,168
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
 

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#710 » by picc » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:53 am

Nowascki wrote:I hate to be the person talking about this, but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace.


This is one of the most selfish, immature and narcissistic things i've ever read. No exaggeration.

You somehow made this about you, while convincing yourself it wasn't. You need help. Hopefully you're getting it.

God bless and get better.
Image
Joerezz7
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,955
And1: 1,567
Joined: Nov 22, 2015

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#711 » by Joerezz7 » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:54 am

goodboy wrote:
Nowascki wrote:I hate to be the person talking about this,
Spoiler:
but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace
.

yeah, we all do.


Who cares? That rape accusation was false anyway. All that woman wanted was money. Once she got what she wanted we never heard about that woman again
GeorgeMarcus wrote:
GeorgeMarcus wrote:


There is nothing inherently different about winning in the Finals compared to winning other playoff seriess,
SOdisciple
Junior
Posts: 361
And1: 873
Joined: Aug 25, 2017
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#712 » by SOdisciple » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:54 am

On the bright side, at least finances won't be an issue for Vanessa and the Bryant family. Who knows how many countless millions of widows there are who are left with nothing after their husband passes.
Joerezz7
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,955
And1: 1,567
Joined: Nov 22, 2015

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#713 » by Joerezz7 » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:55 am

picc wrote:
Nowascki wrote:I hate to be the person talking about this, but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace.


This is one of the most selfish, immature and narcissistic things i've ever read. No exaggeration.

You somehow made this about you, while convincing yourself it wasn't. You need help. Hopefully you're getting it.

God bless and get better.


Totally agree. He should be banned
GeorgeMarcus wrote:
GeorgeMarcus wrote:


There is nothing inherently different about winning in the Finals compared to winning other playoff seriess,
Joerezz7
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,955
And1: 1,567
Joined: Nov 22, 2015

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#714 » by Joerezz7 » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:11 am

Nowascki wrote:I hate to be the person talking about this, but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace.


Anyone who brings up the false rape allegations against Kobe is racist. Only people I been seeing bringing that stuff is racist white people. White supremacist sympathizers. That woman was lying and only wanted money. Once she got the money she was never heard from her again.

As far as the #metoo the only people that have been locked up since that movement started is black men which are Bill Cosby and R Kelly. Jeffrey Epstein and plenty of other white men ACTUALLY GOT AWAY WITH RAPE and did no jail time for it.
GeorgeMarcus wrote:
GeorgeMarcus wrote:


There is nothing inherently different about winning in the Finals compared to winning other playoff seriess,
First Take
Senior
Posts: 554
And1: 414
Joined: Aug 04, 2019

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#715 » by First Take » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:13 am

Joerezz7 wrote:
picc wrote:
Nowascki wrote:I hate to be the person talking about this, but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace.


This is one of the most selfish, immature and narcissistic things i've ever read. No exaggeration.

You somehow made this about you, while convincing yourself it wasn't. You need help. Hopefully you're getting it.

God bless and get better.


Totally agree. He should be banned



Moderators please ban this piece of ****. He literally brought up Kobe's sexual rape case that does not have anything to do with anything. Man I swear people on this forum need to show the man respect especially since he has done a lot to impact so many peoples lives and is a global icon. Go to China, he is loved, goto India he is loved, goto mexico he is loved, Canada, Germany, Iraq, Poland, etc he is loved.

──WARNING─────────────────
Report posts. No personal attacks please.
───────────────────────────
Phystic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,001
And1: 2,752
Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#716 » by Phystic » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:16 am

TimRobbins wrote:
GordanFreeman wrote:So you’re going to prematurely blame the pilot but you’ll apologize if evidence comes out that it was a mechanical issue that caused the crash? I don’t know, that doesn’t seem right to me tbh.


I'll be the first one to apologize if it turns out to be mechanical failure, but all evidence so far suggests otherwise.


The way you keep speaking about this seems as if you want to paint the pilot as a villain. Pilot error, mechanic failure, weather related, whatever the final cause is doesn't change the fact that 9 people are gone. Multiple children that did not get to live their lives, one celebrity who was finally getting to enjoy his life outside of his career, two proud athlete parents, a woman who just got a dream assistant coach job, anoyher proud parents and the pilot. All of which had loved ones and people that cared for them.

I've read different sources that said the fog was bad but not horrible when they took off. That based on communications and normal weather patterns they expected it to clear as they approached their destination. It got worse. The pilot tried to turn and climb and didn't make it. He was an experienced, up to date licenses pilot that Kobe trusted.

There's zero reason to direct blame. Whether the pilot ultimately is found to have made a mistake or if it was simply an accident, it doesn't matter.

Just stop with your mission to vilify the pilot.
moderndarwin
Rookie
Posts: 1,210
And1: 1,305
Joined: Jul 17, 2013

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#717 » by moderndarwin » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:23 am

Doesn’t surprise me that people bring that up.

If you think someone is a rapist then their death probably doesn’t impact you the same way (grief). And if that’s what you believe in your heart then seeing them wept over probably creates some strong resentment and thoughts. Accordingly, people voice those feelings.

However, I think the overwhelming majority of people let that situation play out and have long since moved on from it. They internalized a belief that he screwed up, cheated, got publicly humiliated for it, and has done the right thing by trying to make up to his family for it everyday since then. This is something most people can rock with. We all know plenty of people that have screwed up in life and we all have respect for those that own up to it fully and move on to be a better man.

I think if you are a part of that overwhelming majority it’s better to spend your time focusing on the stories and mourning of people that feel similarly about the man. Now is not the time to even think about those others whether they are trolls or truly have those beliefs
in their hearts.

It’s a lesson of ignoring the noise we all need to internalize in today’s world where anybody and everybody has access to mediums that can reach millions of people.
User avatar
Dr_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 21,527
And1: 96,866
Joined: Feb 27, 2015
Location: Bustelo coffee bar
         

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#718 » by Dr_Heat » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:26 am

Read on Twitter


Kobe inspired a lot of the up and coming NBA young stars
Dr_Heat wrote: Oof
Phystic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,001
And1: 2,752
Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#719 » by Phystic » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:28 am

Drygon wrote:
Spoiler:


I just saw an amazing breakdown on /r/nba by someone who's a pilot himself

https://old.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/ev0ji5/helicopter_sikorsky_crashes_north_of_los_angeles/


(I know this is probably a repost (video/audio of ATC) but I wanted to give some explanation to the video after I shared it with my family members and they were confused on some of the terminology that ATC and the pilot are using in the video. I will break it down in intervals and add some insight into the pilots possible thought process.)

My background: Naval helicopter pilot that has flown in the southern California area for close to 6 years and roughly 1,500 hours of pilot time. I have flown the route that the helicopter was on during the mishap a few times and can speak to the dangers of a marine layer and the possible spatial disorientation it can cause from personal experience.


Some ATC definitions, LA airspace and common aviation parlance.


IFR: Instrument flight rules- Operations in weather that does not allow the aviator to guarantee separation on a see and avoid principle. Requires an instrument rated pilot, a transponder for radar following and a two way radio to operate in. In general, if weather falls below 1000 feet of ceiling for cloud clearance (from the ground to the bottoms of the clouds) and/or less than 3 miles of visibility, IFR must be used..

VFR: Visual flight rules- Operations that allow for a see and avoid principle. Can vary for different types of airspaces around airports, but typically when weather has greater than 1000 feet of ceiling for cloud clearance and greater than 3 miles of visibility.

SVFR: Special VFR (for helicopters) - operating under visual specific weather minimums allow helicopters, because they are slower and easier to maneuver around weather, that says you can operate within an airports airspace as long as you can maintain clear of clouds and 1 mile of visibility. If you want to transit through an airports controlled airspace during weather below VFR minimums, you need to request SVFR.

- The LA airspace is one of the busiest in the country, if not the world. Outside of LAX's Class B (biggest airports), you have multiple other B, C (smaller, still pretty big), and D (smaller, still towered) airports within 50 miles that dot the landscape. Burbank airport (class C) and Van Nuys (class D) airport are northwest of downtown and have specific helicopter routes that allow you to transition through the airspaces, most navigating along highways at prescribed altitudes that allow helicopters to operate within controlled airspace (usually 4000 feet and below within 10 miles of airports) without disrupting other fixed wing traffic.

- The communications you hear in the video are between the helicopter (callsign: 2EX, Two- Echo-Xray) and the control towers of those two airspaces. 2EX is attempting to transit from the southeast to the northwest through these airspaces.


The video:


0:30 - 0:35 - (1021 AM Local time) 2EX has called Burbank Tower (not heard) and Burbank Tower responds with the information about the field. He tells 2EX that the field is IFR, the altimeter setting (barometric pressure that pilot sets to reference altitude on a barometric altimeter) and asks for his intentions (how he plans to proceed as he is not currently under an instrument clearance to proceed to the airport).

0:36-0:42 - (1021 AM Local time) 2EX responds that he wants to proceed westbound to pick up the 101 Freeway and proceed SVFR through the airports airspace. The pilot needs to ask for permission to do this because it means he intends to operate VFR even though the field is IFR.

0:42-0:50 - (1021 AM Local time) Burbank Tower tells 2EX to hold outside the airspace because he has an inbound aircraft that needs to go around on an approach and he needs to maintain separation for that aircraft so it can safely waveoff their approach and set up for another approach. It is unclear why this other aircraft is waving off but can somewhat be safely assumed the weather is a factor. 2EX agrees to hold outside the tower's airspace, which you can see he does with the small graphic doing circles on the screen as the video fast forwards for around 10 minutes.

0:50 (1021 AM Local time) The screen flashes the METAR (Meteorological Terminal Aviation Routine Weather Report), essentially, the current weather in coded format. Of note- it says the visibility is 2 1/2 miles, HZ (Haze), and ceilings are 1100 overcast (which is above 95% sky coverage, so pretty much complete). It does not say how thick that cloud layer is.

0:50-1:30 (1021-1032 AM Local time) Burbank town tells 2EX that they will need to continue holding as the aircraft that they have another aircraft on approach and the aircraft that just waved off needing to sequence in before they can clear 2EX through the airspace. 2EX acknowledges to continue holding and is then given instructions on what they can expect after those aircraft are clear.

1:30-2:05 (1032 -1033 AM Local time) Burbank tower makes a call to another aircraft to help out 2EX to get going as they have been holding for awhile now. He clears 2EX north along the 5 HWY (runs southeast to northwest) through the airspace using SVFR and at or below 2500 feet MSL (altitude in mean sea level). 2EX acknowledges and proceeds through the airspace.

- A quick aside. At this point, it is unclear how bad the weather is or if 2EX is actually maintaining SVFR rules or if the haze is making the visibility less that SVFR minimums. From my personal experience navigating in the marine layer a good amount over the past 6 years, it has varying levels of severity.

2:05-2:45 (1032-1037 AM Local time) Burbank tower gives 2EX the option of proceeding along the 118 Freeway and then rejoining the 5 as it heads toward Van Nuys airport's airspace. 2EX follows that route and checks in with Van Nuys Tower, telling the controller he is operating under SVFR and is at 1400' feet MSL.

2:45-3:21 (1037 AM Local time) Burbank tower clears 2EX through Van Nuys airspace and gives a similar weather report to Burbank tower. She also advises them to transit below 2500 feet MSL and to advise when they are VFR or when clear of the Van Nuys airspace to the west. 2EX acknowledges the instructions.

3:22-3:52 (1037-1039 AM Local time) Van Nuys Tower asks if they would like to contact So Cal (Souther California) approach when they are clear of the airspace to which 2EX responds in the affirmative. 2EX then asks if they can turn west toward the 101 as they are clear of the Van Nuys class D airspace to which she responds affirmative and asks if they are in VFR conditions to which 2EX says yes they are at 1500 feet MSL. Van Nuys Tower checks off with 2EX saying they can check in with So Cal Approach for flight following (a form of continued radar services while maintaining VFR provided because the approach controllers have radar coverage in the area)

3:52-4:24 (1039-1043 AM Local time) The video speeds up as the display indicates 2EX is turning south. At this point the only voice communication heard is So Cal approach asking 2EX if they are looking for flight following and to say their intentions as it seems they are veering off of 101 as previously intended. When the radar contact disappears, the last call was that 2EX was too low for flight following.


Some final thoughts:


1. I do not do any of this analysis to pass judgement on the pilot heard in the video. It is rare that helicopter aviation is in the spot light like this and I just wanted to provide some context for what was happening. I have the deepest sympathies for the pilot, the passengers in the mishap and their loved ones.

2. Vertigo is a term you may hear that the pilot had during this mishap. Think of vertigo as being instantly drunk and unable to have your brain communicate function to your body. It can occur when you encounter clouds when you are not expecting it or believe that the horizon that you are referencing while flying is there when in reality it is not. I can see how that is confusing and there are many youtube videos that can show the effects of veritgo on pilots.

3. I have had incapacitating vertigo once while flying my helicopter and it was the scariest moment of my life. It was like nothing I have experienced before while flying and hope to never experience again. My motor functions and brain connection basically became disconnected and I was unable to tell if the aircraft was climbing / descending / turning / straight. It was at night and I went into the clouds at an area I was extremely familiar with. I was complacent to the mission I was conducting because I had done it so often and it nearly cost me my own life and the lives of 4 other people that night. I was saved by my copilot and his ability to use his training to get us back straight and level and talk me back onto the instrumentation.

4. I do not know if this pilot had vertigo or simply lost control of the aircraft. The bad weather, his intention to turn to the west and sudden departure to out of control flight (a climb to above 2000+ feet MSL and ultimately crash landing at 4000 feet per minute rate of descent) are indicators that some kind of spatial disorientation may have been a factor.

Long post, hope it was helpful if you were looking for some analysis on the recording.


Thank you for this, not only the explanation of the video but your experienced based opinion on a possible explanation to what could have caused this.

Just want to make sure I understood your break down, are you saying they explained that the weather was bad but acceptable? Sort of like a plane flying through a storm
Phystic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,001
And1: 2,752
Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: Kobe Bryant Discussion, Part Two 

Post#720 » by Phystic » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:32 am

Joerezz7 wrote:
Spoiler:
quote="Nowascki"]I hate to be the person talking about this, but I feel like it's needed. Unfortunately even today, in the modern days, the hatred and prejudice against women runs deeply in America. The #metoo movement exposed this. Kobe was an amazing player, a myth, a legend, but if are being sincere here he also very likely sexually assaulted an innocent woman. Might have even ruined her life. But we don't talk about this. Most people don't even know her name. We only talk about the glory and the fame, but nothing about the bad parts.

And we are talking something global here. The NBA is watched everywhere, and women everywhere live with fear of being sexually assaulted. As a trans woman, I live with this fear too. What kind of message are we sending here when we sweep this under the rug? We need to be mature and talk about the good and bad things in the life of a person. It's very serious, especially in cases like this. And it's disturbing when most of the media and hollywood, who are both industries full of sexism, don't even dare mention it just because Kobe was famous and a millionaire. The part of the media who is mentioning it is suffering fierce and disgusting sexist attacks, like the Washington Post reporter. Is this the NBA we want?

Anyway, this doesn't erase the fact that it was a horrifically sad and tragic accident, I hope all those who died rest in peace.[/quote]


Anyone who brings up the false rape allegations against Kobe is racist. Only people I been seeing bringing that stuff is racist white people. White supremacist sympathizers. That woman was lying and only wanted money. Once she got the money she was never heard from her again.

As far as the #metoo the only people that have been locked up since that movement started is black men which are Bill Cosby and R Kelly. Jeffrey Epstein and plenty of other white men ACTUALLY GOT AWAY WITH RAPE and did no jail time for it.[/quote]



Maybe I've missed your other posts but the only ones I've seen from you on these threads is you calling people racist and trying to push your own agendas. Ironic you're doing exactly what your complaining about.

Just as inappropriate as the post you quoted.

Return to The General Board