WWE SmackDown Discussion II

Moderators: Marcus, Stanford

User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,925
And1: 5,144
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1541 » by WRau1 » Thu Feb 13, 2020 11:31 pm

I don't know what to think about Goldberg going over Fiend. It sounds like a stupid idea on their part but that didn't stop the WWE from doing the same thing to white hot Owens. Goldberg (who is rumored to also be working WM) doesn't seem like a guy that would stick around to keep being beat. Goldberg v Reigns at Mania would be a Vince McMahon wet dream.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,628
And1: 2,923
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1542 » by tugs » Fri Feb 14, 2020 3:43 am

jakecronus8 wrote:Only thing I’d semi enjoy would be that idea someone had where taker costs fiend the match and fiend properly retires taker at mania in a squash
Wow this can happen. Something like Fiend squashing Goldberg, punishing him outside the ring. When he tosses him inside, Taker's gong hits and he appears on the stage. They stare each other down, Fiend maniacally laughing until he gets counted out.

Of course stipulation should be any loss, not just via pin and submission, Bray can lose the title. Too obvious though
User avatar
iMoreland
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,441
And1: 2,945
Joined: Jan 23, 2014
   

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1543 » by iMoreland » Sat Feb 15, 2020 10:34 pm

Otis is on track to be the biggest babyface the wrestling world has ever seen
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,628
And1: 2,923
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1544 » by tugs » Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:09 am

His, "OH YEEEAAAAHHHH!!!" is really funny, simple, and effective
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,046
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1545 » by loserX » Sun Feb 16, 2020 2:28 am

Yesterday Smackdown was in Vancouver, where I live (first time we've had a televised event in...I don't even know how long. Ever?) I didn't go, but watched it on TV, and man am I glad I didn't go.

Three matches in two hours, one of which was Sheamus squashing Apollo Crews and Shorty G, and another one was a truly awful 30-minute(!) snoozefest between Bayley and Carmella. The main event had its moments and the Sami/Cesaro bit was amusing, but yikes. I'd have been mighty annoyed if I'd shelled out for an event and most of the best parts were watching pre-recorded scenes on a TV screen.
The_Brecht
Starter
Posts: 2,054
And1: 903
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
 

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1546 » by The_Brecht » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:41 pm

Good episode of Smackdown.
The skits were really good imo.
West-Flemish for behinners:

    - Dust means thirsty.
Scott Hall
RealGM
Posts: 23,432
And1: 62,604
Joined: May 04, 2015
Location: T-Dot
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1547 » by Scott Hall » Sat Feb 22, 2020 7:00 am

Thought tonights episode was about as bad as you can get. Recently in an interview Nick Aldis referred to WWE as
"Nickelodeon Wrestling" and Jon Moxley just referred to WWE as "Broadway" and I totally saw it with all the singing
and instruments and dancing didn't feel like it was PG felt like it was a straight up kids show with Days of our Lives
Otis/Mandy/Ziggler storyline thrown in there.

I had high hopes for Smackdown going on FOX but it still feels like the "B" show to me and I really don't like their roster
after the brand split. Most of the acts I don't like or find boring are all on this show.
Wo1verine
2015 Beat the Commish Champion
Posts: 17,566
And1: 11,761
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1548 » by Wo1verine » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:43 pm

Goldberg being back is exciting but if the end game is him vs. RR at WM with Reigns winning i am not interested.

Goldberg losing to Lesnar? Np
Goldberg losing to Undertaker? Np
Goldberg losing to Reigns? - That would be a career embarrassment IMO.
Image
BrunoSkull
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,925
And1: 5,144
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1549 » by WRau1 » Mon Feb 24, 2020 6:13 pm

More fuel to the Goldberg over Fiend rumors. Apparently all of SmackDown's WM plans have changed.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1550 » by Ruzious » Mon Feb 24, 2020 10:22 pm

loserX wrote:Yesterday Smackdown was in Vancouver, where I live (first time we've had a televised event in...I don't even know how long. Ever?) I didn't go, but watched it on TV, and man am I glad I didn't go.

Three matches in two hours, one of which was Sheamus squashing Apollo Crews and Shorty G, and another one was a truly awful 30-minute(!) snoozefest between Bayley and Carmella. The main event had its moments and the Sami/Cesaro bit was amusing, but yikes. I'd have been mighty annoyed if I'd shelled out for an event and most of the best parts were watching pre-recorded scenes on a TV screen.

Mella was really bad - just too many sloppy moments. I'll be honest - I'm entertained by Bayley's character - even if nobody else is. I have no idea why they're pushing Sheamus. The Shorty G thing is such a waste of talent and I'm guessing makes no sense to anyone but Vince.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,628
And1: 2,923
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1551 » by tugs » Sun Mar 1, 2020 4:18 am

Fiend pointing was weird
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,878
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1552 » by Spens1 » Sat Mar 7, 2020 3:36 am

Now i'm convined the only reason Pritchard ever got anywhere in the business is by being a yes man cause my god that smackdown was attrocious.

Heavy Machinery went over The New Day, Miz and Morrison (why the hell did Morrison come back) and the Usos. Are you kidding me.

Also Bayley and Sasha Banks, two of the best women in the company need to win via rollup against the evergreen Lacey Evans and midcarder for life Naomi.

I mean, at least Apollo Crews was on the show i guess.

Also more nostalgia...... seriously this company is going to die, or at least downsize badly because they've failed to build ANY stars (Roman is getting to be on par with Lex Luger for massive failed pushes, Rollins failed miserably in the position so badly they had to turn him heel as well).
The_Brecht
Starter
Posts: 2,054
And1: 903
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
 

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1553 » by The_Brecht » Sat Mar 7, 2020 12:11 pm

Otis is the most over man in the company.
West-Flemish for behinners:

    - Dust means thirsty.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1554 » by Ruzious » Sat Mar 7, 2020 2:02 pm

Spens1 wrote:Now i'm convined the only reason Pritchard ever got anywhere in the business is by being a yes man cause my god that smackdown was attrocious.

Heavy Machinery went over The New Day, Miz and Morrison (why the hell did Morrison come back) and the Usos. Are you kidding me.

Also Bayley and Sasha Banks, two of the best women in the company need to win via rollup against the evergreen Lacey Evans and midcarder for life Naomi.

I mean, at least Apollo Crews was on the show i guess.

Also more nostalgia...... seriously this company is going to die, or at least downsize badly because they've failed to build ANY stars (Roman is getting to be on par with Lex Luger for massive failed pushes, Rollins failed miserably in the position so badly they had to turn him heel as well).

Fans aren't blameless in the fall of the WWE shows. No matter who the WWE chose to be their top face, fans wouldn't accept that person. It's bad enough that they wouldn't accept Roman, but not accepting Rollins was proof of that problem. The "they forced him down our throats" excuse went way too far, and fans got far too self-righteous about it.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
iMoreland
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,441
And1: 2,945
Joined: Jan 23, 2014
   

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1555 » by iMoreland » Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:37 am

They should just have The New Day in attendance for these empty arena shows
JohnPferdelack
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,516
Joined: Mar 15, 2017
         

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1556 » by JohnPferdelack » Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:43 am

They show the EC-match...(ppv) on a weekly show...
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 15,993
And1: 7,273
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1557 » by jakecronus8 » Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:31 am

That Cena promo was straight fire. He really is the GOAT. @ me all you want.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,104
And1: 16,808
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1558 » by Stanford » Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:41 am

I have a spreadsheet from 2016 that shows you ranked Cena behind Austin, Hogan, The Rock and Randy Savage. I won't @ you though.

I had him first, by the way :wink:

Receipts
JohnPferdelack
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,516
Joined: Mar 15, 2017
         

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1559 » by JohnPferdelack » Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:48 am

in my eyes, it was under these circumstances a good show. but nevertheless, i don't think it is good for a lengthy peroid of time.
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,925
And1: 5,144
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II 

Post#1560 » by WRau1 » Sat Mar 14, 2020 3:03 am

Cena Wyatt promo was amazing. This build is going to be great.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz

Return to Pro Wrestling