HarthorneWingo wrote:moocow007 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:This young man says the Knicks select Haliburton at 6 and that he has a high ceiling.
This young man needs to either watch the player more thoroughly or look at getting a better prescription on his corrective eyewear. What was his opinion of Jarrett Culver? A guy that can put up triple doubles in the NBA (as some has said) or a guy that can put up triple singles as what he appears to be?
Do you disagree on Haliburton? Or all of it?
My opinion of Haliburton is that his NBA potential is not that of a starting PG. I don't think his ball skills and passing skills are of the caliber that NBA points have. Nor does he have the type of speed, explosiveness and fluidity for an high end NBA point. Net result is limited ceiling.
He does appear to have high BBIQ. He appears to be mature. He's also mostly very fundamentally sound. His shooting, while a bit odd, can probably work well enough so that we're at least talking about someone that can viably be taking 3-4 of them a game and probably making about 37-38% of them. This indicates that he probably has a high floor.
If the goal is to play it safe and find a potential solid rotational player, then sure. But is that really what the Knicks need? Not IMHO.
By no means is he useless and I do believe that he can play in the NBA, but I don't see him as a guy that I would want to have as the starting PG on my team unless I have someone like Lebron James or James Harden that my offense can run through. For the Knicks? Nah. He'll end up being not much better than Elfrid Payton from an overall impact standpoint (not skill standpoint). Not enough of a ceiling. Not enough of the potential to move the needle to any great degree. And not enough of a system or a team that he would benefit from fitting into here.
I'm looking for a guy that can potentially be an impact player in the NBA on a team that is basically dying for high end talent (the Knicks). I see Haliburton as more of a 6th man type in the NBA. Someone like a Shaun Livingston in his mid-career prime? Maybe a Jason Terry type guy. Jordan Clarkson if he decides to focus on himself lol? That level of player.
Again, not bad by any means, but not great either. If the Knicks pick him it'll be like thinking you spotted a quarter in the cushions only to realize that it was a nickle. Reminds me of that scene in Monty Pythons the Holy Grail, where the Knights were glad simply to make it through the frozen wastes of Nador by eating Robin's minstrels. That level of rejoicing.
And yes, I can obviously be wrong. But that's my opinion watching him play and trying to picture what he can do in the NBA. It's not just about college stats or how well his team is doing for me. Have seen way to many "college stars" not being able to make the (sizable) transition once they hit the NBA. College points and NBA points? There's a river between them.