DCZards wrote:dckingsfan wrote:We have been trying to do that for decades... with only backward movement. Once an institution is in place it fights not to change. That is a tired mantra that just isn't effective. We need to move away from that failing mantra.
Especially the "stop blaming the hardworking... pick the worker" mantra. No one is blaming them that is a strawman argument. It is a systematic problem. It is the construct of the institution that is the problem. The only reason there is some success is that those good workers work around the system. Think of how well they could do in a better construct than the one from the 50s.
And no, many failing schools that were decommissioned and recommissioned succeeded. So, there is that...
Well, if you want teachers and police officers (the frontline workers) to buy into the changes and reforms you want to make, it's smart to have them and/or their representatives at the table...as well as the community, parents and other stakeholders. Topdown changes never work.
Actually not. Let's take police officers and their unions. They are never going to agree to remove immunity. The union doesn't want to see its numbers reduced (for other types of institutions). They aren't going to voluntarily remove the blue wall.
That construct needs to be blown to smithereens and then rebuilt. And without due influence of those stakeholders.
And yes, proper construct changes do work.














