Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Minnesota trades: S&T Beasley (few mil more than MLE), Johnson, Brooklyn 1st (pick charlotte's choice of prospect)
Minnesota receives: Tobias Harris
Philadelphia trades: Harris, Horford, next 2 future 2nds
Philadelphia receives: Love, Rozier
Cleveland trades: Love
Cleveland receives: Johnson, Zeller, future philly 2nds
Charlotte trades: Rozier, Zeller
Charlotte receives: Horford, S&T Beasley, Brooklyn 1st
Why for Minny: get a perfect 4 for rosas' system
Why for Philly: save money and balance roster. ~11 mil saved can go towards keeping Jrich in future. i personally like embiid/love/jrich/simmons more than embiid/horford/harris/simmons moving forward.
Why for Cleveland: dump love for expirings and get an future 2nds
Why for Charlotte: Get a young SG to better pair w/ graham, eat horford for a mid 1st
Embiid
Love/Scott
Richardson/Korkmaz
Thybulle/Milton
Simmons/Rozier
KAT/Reid
Harris/Gomez
Okogie/Layman
Culver
Russell/McLaughlin
+BPA minn 2020 1st (edwards would be ideal)
Horford
Washington
Bridges
Beasley
Graham
I know the S&T and draft pick thing can be risky, but i dont think beasley will have much if any suitors elsewhere for more than MLE .
Minnesota receives: Tobias Harris
Philadelphia trades: Harris, Horford, next 2 future 2nds
Philadelphia receives: Love, Rozier
Cleveland trades: Love
Cleveland receives: Johnson, Zeller, future philly 2nds
Charlotte trades: Rozier, Zeller
Charlotte receives: Horford, S&T Beasley, Brooklyn 1st
Why for Minny: get a perfect 4 for rosas' system
Why for Philly: save money and balance roster. ~11 mil saved can go towards keeping Jrich in future. i personally like embiid/love/jrich/simmons more than embiid/horford/harris/simmons moving forward.
Why for Cleveland: dump love for expirings and get an future 2nds
Why for Charlotte: Get a young SG to better pair w/ graham, eat horford for a mid 1st
Embiid
Love/Scott
Richardson/Korkmaz
Thybulle/Milton
Simmons/Rozier
KAT/Reid
Harris/Gomez
Okogie/Layman
Culver
Russell/McLaughlin
+BPA minn 2020 1st (edwards would be ideal)
Horford
Washington
Bridges
Beasley
Graham
I know the S&T and draft pick thing can be risky, but i dont think beasley will have much if any suitors elsewhere for more than MLE .
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 18,454
- And1: 26,925
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
- Location: San Diego, California
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
I like Tobias Harris, but Minnesota 100% cannot afford to take on the remainder of his 150/4 deal at all, much less when giving up slightly positive assets is added to the equation.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Domejandro wrote:I like Tobias Harris, but Minnesota 100% cannot afford to take on the remainder of his 150/4 deal at all, much less when giving up slightly positive assets is added to the equation.
I think it can be done because minny only has rookie scale contracts outside of these big 3s for next 2 years on their roster so they wont be in the tax like philly.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,455
- And1: 8,461
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
- Location: Philadelphia(ish)
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Hate it for the Sixers. They get considerably worse talent-wise and are still taking on contracts that are just as "bad"
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
I think where I'm lost is this treats Love as more valuable (or less negative if you prefer) than Horford and I just don't see that at all.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
BullyKing wrote:I think where I'm lost is this treats Love as more valuable (or less negative if you prefer) than Horford and I just don't see that at all.
I was more comparing love with harris as a third option to Embiid/simmons based on a previous thread. i remember that ppl disliked it because horford was still on the team, and so i added a horford for rozier swap with minny giving the incentive to charlotte instead.
So i had:
Love plus 1st = harris
Rozier = horford plus 1st
Net is
Love plus rozier = harris plus horford
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
youngcrev wrote:Hate it for the Sixers. They get considerably worse talent-wise and are still taking on contracts that are just as "bad"
I think they are slightly worse in 2020 (worse talent but better fit) but significantly better in talent and fit in 2021 and beyond.
2020 harris/horford/jrich vs love/jrich/rozier + tax savings
2021 harris/horford vs love/jrich/rozier
2022 harris/horford (or just harris alone if u eat 14 mil to cut horford) vs love/jrich
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,455
- And1: 8,461
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
- Location: Philadelphia(ish)
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Godaddycurse wrote:BullyKing wrote:I think where I'm lost is this treats Love as more valuable (or less negative if you prefer) than Horford and I just don't see that at all.
I was more comparing love with harris as a third option to Embiid/simmons based on a previous thread. i remember that ppl disliked it because horford was still on the team, and so i added a horford for rozier swap with minny giving the incentive to charlotte instead.
So i had:
Love plus 1st = harris
Rozier = horford plus 1st
Net is
Love plus rozier = harris plus horford
No clue why the Sixers would prefer Love to Harris. Worse fit on pretty much every level (fit, skill set, position, age)
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
- HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,469
- And1: 12,535
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
- Location: within Mark Williams' reach
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
youngcrev wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:BullyKing wrote:I think where I'm lost is this treats Love as more valuable (or less negative if you prefer) than Horford and I just don't see that at all.
I was more comparing love with harris as a third option to Embiid/simmons based on a previous thread. i remember that ppl disliked it because horford was still on the team, and so i added a horford for rozier swap with minny giving the incentive to charlotte instead.
So i had:
Love plus 1st = harris
Rozier = horford plus 1st
Net is
Love plus rozier = harris plus horford
No clue why the Sixers would prefer Love to Harris. Worse fit on pretty much every level (fit, skill set, position, age)
They free up $ to retain Richardson and get to swap rozier for horford. Fit wise both would be PFs, skill set love is a better shooter and playoff performer
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Godaddycurse wrote:youngcrev wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
I was more comparing love with harris as a third option to Embiid/simmons based on a previous thread. i remember that ppl disliked it because horford was still on the team, and so i added a horford for rozier swap with minny giving the incentive to charlotte instead.
So i had:
Love plus 1st = harris
Rozier = horford plus 1st
Net is
Love plus rozier = harris plus horford
No clue why the Sixers would prefer Love to Harris. Worse fit on pretty much every level (fit, skill set, position, age)
They free up $ to retain Richardson. Fit wise both would be PFs, skill set love is a better shooter and playoff performer
The salary savings between Harris and Love are minimal and he is a much worse player at this point. If the idea that Love is an upgrade to Harris that's a hard pass for me.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
BullyKing wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:youngcrev wrote:
No clue why the Sixers would prefer Love to Harris. Worse fit on pretty much every level (fit, skill set, position, age)
They free up $ to retain Richardson. Fit wise both would be PFs, skill set love is a better shooter and playoff performer
The salary savings between Harris and Love are minimal and he is a much worse player at this point. If the idea that Love is an upgrade to Harris that's a hard pass for me.
I dont think love is an upgrade over Harris on his own but love/rozier(for a yr)/j rich is a better supporting cast than horford/harris moving forward. I have harris worth a 1st more than love as mentioned above. 30 mil over the life of the contract is also not insignificant.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Godaddycurse wrote:BullyKing wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
They free up $ to retain Richardson. Fit wise both would be PFs, skill set love is a better shooter and playoff performer
The salary savings between Harris and Love are minimal and he is a much worse player at this point. If the idea that Love is an upgrade to Harris that's a hard pass for me.
I dont think love is an upgrade but love/rozier(for a yr)/j rich is a better supporting cast than horford/harris moving forward. I have harris worth a 1st more than love as mentioned above. 30 mil over the life of the contract is also not insignificant.
Yeah I just don't see that at all and I don't understand why the Sixers wouldn't just prefer to trade Richardson for long term assets if they really can't afford him. But the problem is you have Love being dumped for just expiring contracts and if that's the case then the Sixers should be easily able to trade Horford for expirings and just use those savings to resign Richardson. I don't think either is really possible but that's the problem with this trade.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
CLE has already publically stated they won't dump KLove
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
BullyKing wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:BullyKing wrote:
The salary savings between Harris and Love are minimal and he is a much worse player at this point. If the idea that Love is an upgrade to Harris that's a hard pass for me.
I dont think love is an upgrade but love/rozier(for a yr)/j rich is a better supporting cast than horford/harris moving forward. I have harris worth a 1st more than love as mentioned above. 30 mil over the life of the contract is also not insignificant.
Yeah I just don't see that at all and I don't understand why the Sixers wouldn't just prefer to trade Richardson for long term assets if they really can't afford him. But the problem is you have Love being dumped for just expiring contracts and if that's the case then the Sixers should be easily able to trade Horford for expirings and just use those savings to resign Richardson. I don't think either is really possible but that's the problem with this trade.
Hmm interesting point raised on horford vs love. I do think love is less negative than horford because he is 3 years younger. Maybe my valuation is off I can try and see if there is another option besides love that is better fitting for a harris to wolves v2
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 18,454
- And1: 26,925
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
- Location: San Diego, California
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Godaddycurse wrote:Domejandro wrote:I like Tobias Harris, but Minnesota 100% cannot afford to take on the remainder of his 150/4 deal at all, much less when giving up slightly positive assets is added to the equation.
I think it can be done because minny only has rookie scale contracts outside of these big 3s for next 2 years on their roster so they wont be in the tax like philly.
$33,517,241 $36,000,000 $38,482,759 $40,965,517
$28,649,250 $30,013,500 $31,377,750
$29,430,000 $31,610,000 $33,790,000 $35,970,000
That is unsustainable, especially for a roster of Karl-Anthony Towns, Tobias Harris, and D'Angelo Russell.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,305
- And1: 10,288
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Domejandro wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Domejandro wrote:I like Tobias Harris, but Minnesota 100% cannot afford to take on the remainder of his 150/4 deal at all, much less when giving up slightly positive assets is added to the equation.
I think it can be done because minny only has rookie scale contracts outside of these big 3s for next 2 years on their roster so they wont be in the tax like philly.
$33,517,241 $36,000,000 $38,482,759 $40,965,517
$28,649,250 $30,013,500 $31,377,750
$29,430,000 $31,610,000 $33,790,000 $35,970,000
That is unsustainable, especially for a roster of Karl-Anthony Towns, Tobias Harris, and D'Angelo Russell.
KAT 29.4M
Russell 28.6
Harris 33.5
Culver 6.1
Layman 3.7
Okogie 2.6
Evans 2
Spellman 2
Nowell 1.5
Reid 1.5
McLaughlin 1.5
1st rd pk 5.5-7.6
that's about 120M leaving the wolves with MLE to use as well or just resign Gomez. I think in a scenario where Wolves keep their pick, harris is one of the better option to fill a hole/improve the team without paying the tax. Now if they include their 2020 1st then they can likely get other/more cost efficient options. I don't think they will have any cap flexibility after this year anyway so might as well spend to the tax threshold.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
Domejandro wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Domejandro wrote:I like Tobias Harris, but Minnesota 100% cannot afford to take on the remainder of his 150/4 deal at all, much less when giving up slightly positive assets is added to the equation.
I think it can be done because minny only has rookie scale contracts outside of these big 3s for next 2 years on their roster so they wont be in the tax like philly.
$33,517,241 $36,000,000 $38,482,759 $40,965,517
$28,649,250 $30,013,500 $31,377,750
$29,430,000 $31,610,000 $33,790,000 $35,970,000
That is unsustainable, especially for a roster of Karl-Anthony Towns, Tobias Harris, and D'Angelo Russell.
There's also the possibility that whoever ends up buying the team has real money and won't be scared of the tax, which I'm hoping for. League has enough owners who are unwilling or unable to do what it takes to play with the big boys.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,411
- And1: 3,064
- Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
there's no logical reason for CLE to salary dump Kevin Love.
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 55,178
- And1: 14,515
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Cleveland - Minnesota - Philadelphia - Charlotte
tidho wrote:there's no logical reason for CLE to salary dump Kevin Love.
I’m not sure why you would use the word, “logical.”
Isn’t one reason to not write checks to a guy that isn’t worth his contract?
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
Return to Trades and Transactions