sco wrote:bad knees wrote:MrSparkle wrote:Bulls unrelated (kind of), but trade ideas where both top picks are traded:
MIN #1 & JJ to ATL for #6, Reddish, Huerter, TPE
- ATL gets hometown Edwards, finalizes their starting line-up: Trae-Edwards-Hunter-Collins-Capella
- MIN keeps the ball in Russell's hands, adds wing-depth and drafts Okoro, Vassell, or Onkongwu who all fit that roster better than Edwards
GSW #2, Poole, Looney for DET #7, Sekou, Rose, Kennard
- Fills out GS's depth chart: Kennard came around this season; groomed as a backup for ACL Klay. Sekou has a defensive potential. GSW takes BPA at #7. Hali, Okoro, Vassell, Deni, Bey, Nesmith, Okongwu - any of these guys potentially fit GSW better than LaMelo.
- DET takes LaMelo as they start a major rebuild. Maybe Sekou's potential (super raw) and Kennard's production are too much for Detroit to give up, but they certainly haven't proven to be building blocks.
I don't think that GSW finds a Bulls #4 offer appealing given the lack of separation between 4-10 prospects.
I can see CHI just standing pat with #4 and taking the BPA. If a "tier 1" is established, and Wiseman, Hayes, LaMelo are it (not saying they are, but if they are in the scout's opinions), I imagine AK rolls the dice on the remaining guy instead of trading up or down. It's a tough spot to trade out of because there's a flat-talent gap in the top-10.
If Tier 1 is Wiseman, Hayes and LaMelo, I think the Bulls happily take Edwards at 4.
The only way I can see the Bulls trading back from 4 is if LaMelo were to fall to them. He's got the sizzle that the Knicks, for example, would want. Knicks have 8 and future picks plus 27 this year to trade. The other way for the Bulls to get a lottery pick is to trade Lauri. He's a perfect fit for PHX, who sit at 10. Doing that trade opens up the possibility of a trade with Boston, who has 14, 26 and 30. Trading Lauri also avoids overpaying him, which is our current path - I'm sorry but I'm down on him, and am not interested in creating an inefficient offense to maximize his counting numbers.
IMO, Wiseman will drop to (and past - hopefully) the Bulls. Lamelo and Edwards will be gone by 4.
I can see it. I didn't mean to exclude Edwards from "tier 1." From what we understand, he's probably gonna be the 1st pick. I also didn't mean to imply I want Wiseman. But ATM he is considered a consensus top-2. Of course so were Ayton and Bagley, and Wiseman is a much less proven prospect.
I will say, AK clearly believes in the big man. Nuggets are pretty much the only team in the NBA the last few years with a functional/winning center rotation, besides Embiid. He traded for Nurkic, who got converted into for Plumlee. He added Millsap, moving him back from his successful ATL run at C back to archaic big PF. Drafted Bol Bol and kept him for over a year when no one else wanted to bother with an injury-prone project. And he's gambled on some low-skill/IQ athletic prospects (Mudiay). Traded the Mitchell pick for Lyden and Lyles, more stiff big men. Was the last guy to take a chance on Hibbert before he retired. And he's pretty confident in player development. Of course it's hard to know whether Jokic was a lucky break or a deep scouting Krause stroke of genius (of course he had a pulse on Euro prospects, but whether he expected Jokic to actually pilot a modern NBA playoff offense...).
So I wouldn't be shocked if Wiseman's talent-ceiling outweighs the red flags, in AK's eyes. Having a cross-armed pogo stick doesn't sound appealing to me, but adding a project PG who can't shoot or burst to the rim also doesn't sound great... And I'm cooling off on Deni, as I do see him more of a role-player with a long-shot fringe star ceiling. So I'm just saying, the options are wide open. Obi and Onkongwu probably have to be in consideration too.
In regards to the Deni pick, you CAN purse one of these FAs to address SF depth and probably get the same ball-park production for 4-years: Gallinari, Joe Harris, SAC's Bogdanovic. Saric is also going to be an RFA and only 26. I do think one big difference between Arturas and Gar/Pax is that he's going to add realistic long-term targets with FA money, not have this Plan A or B-bust kind of approach, where the Plan B is a regret-move about 24hrs after it's inked.