Kobblehead wrote:Lowry is such a gamer, man.
I regret poo-pooing bringing him in on a max a few years ago.
Was so repulsed at the idea of bringing in Lowry when those rumors were swirling around.
Baller fr.
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Kobblehead wrote:Lowry is such a gamer, man.
I regret poo-pooing bringing him in on a max a few years ago.
76ciology wrote:Spoiler:
I’d consider the Heat as a smallball team given Bam is only 6’9 and their PF is Duncan Robinson. What made them special and just designed to beat the Bucks was how their wings (Crowder and Iggy) are able to defend Giannis while they also have Bam to defend Giannis, just in case.
Embiid is tricky because of his health and conditioning issue. That I think it would be smart to have a really good center that can back him up. But it doesnt mean we have to overpay for a back-up for him.
I don’t think Ben can play back-up C unless you have a overwhelming firepower offense that can allow you to not play atleast very good defense.
Sixers fall into the same category, in terms of built, as the Raptors, Bucks and Lakers. And between the three, Sixers is more in the middle of the Lakers and the Bucks. I think we have the depth of the Bucks with the talent of the top 2 players of the Lakers. The key is for Ben and Biid to continually trend towards being as good as current Bron and AD.
Playing big is not looking good right now. The Lakers-Rockets series is really an “in your face” example of this.
I actually have a post as response where I said I don’t think bullyball can win against small ball. But the more I watch this game, I think it’s not that impossible.
The blueprint for a team that plays big to beat a smallball team are shown in two Sixers games. 2019 game 7 against the Raptors and 2020 game 3 against the Celtics.
To beat a smallball team, the team that plays big has to win it by having more possessions (by ORebs, not taking care of TOs and defence) and getting a lot more to the line.
It also reminded me of how the Grizzlies (Zbo-Marc) played against the Warriors. The problem back then was that Grizz was just outmatched in talent. So they can keep it close but in the end talent always prevailed.
Its gonna be an uphill battle playing our style against the league favored smallball. It will require Pat Riley level conditioning and motor from our guys. It will also require our guys, outside Embiid, to really step up on offense. We have to reach that level where we can tell Embiid that we will take the load from him on offense so he can focus on defense.
That’s the cards were dealt with and we just have to make the most out of it.
Arsenal wrote:76ciology wrote:Spoiler:
I’d consider the Heat as a smallball team given Bam is only 6’9 and their PF is Duncan Robinson. What made them special and just designed to beat the Bucks was how their wings (Crowder and Iggy) are able to defend Giannis while they also have Bam to defend Giannis, just in case.
Embiid is tricky because of his health and conditioning issue. That I think it would be smart to have a really good center that can back him up. But it doesnt mean we have to overpay for a back-up for him.
I don’t think Ben can play back-up C unless you have a overwhelming firepower offense that can allow you to not play atleast very good defense.
Sixers fall into the same category, in terms of built, as the Raptors, Bucks and Lakers. And between the three, Sixers is more in the middle of the Lakers and the Bucks. I think we have the depth of the Bucks with the talent of the top 2 players of the Lakers. The key is for Ben and Biid to continually trend towards being as good as current Bron and AD.
Playing big is not looking good right now. The Lakers-Rockets series is really an “in your face” example of this.
I actually have a post as response where I said I don’t think bullyball can win against small ball. But the more I watch this game, I think it’s not that impossible.
The blueprint for a team that plays big to beat a smallball team are shown in two Sixers games. 2019 game 7 against the Raptors and 2020 game 3 against the Celtics.
To beat a smallball team, the team that plays big has to win it by having more possessions (by ORebs, not taking care of TOs and defence) and getting a lot more to the line.
It also reminded me of how the Grizzlies (Zbo-Marc) played against the Warriors. The problem back then was that Grizz was just outmatched in talent. So they can keep it close but in the end talent always prevailed.
Its gonna be an uphill battle playing our style against the league favored smallball. It will require Pat Riley level conditioning and motor from our guys. It will also require our guys, outside Embiid, to really step up on offense. We have to reach that level where we can tell Embiid that we will take the load from him on offense so he can focus on defense.
That’s the cards were dealt with and we just have to make the most out of it.
All you people claiming we can't play Ben at Center. Please explain the great rim protector that teams like Boston and Houston are using?
Rim protection is OVERRATED. That's dinosaur thinking. It's more important to defend the perimeter, which you can do with 5 wing sized players on the floor.
It's makes all the sense in the world for Ben to be our backup "Center", i.e. be the largest player on our team, surrounded by wings when Embiid is sitting.

Kobblehead wrote:No surprise there. It makes no sense to run isolation sets for guys that can't score off the dribble.
LeBron, Giannis, Zion, Embiid, Davis, etc. If they're not paired with a star halfcourt option, they ain't winning anything.
Kobblehead wrote:No surprise there. It makes no sense to run isolation sets for guys that can't score off the dribble.
LeBron, Giannis, Zion, Embiid, Davis, etc. If they're not paired with a star halfcourt option, they ain't winning anything.
76ciology wrote:The problem with the Bucks is they are big but they are playing like a small ball team.
They’re not trying to get more possessions
They’re not scoring 2s at a high %
Giannis is playing like Harden then kicking out to poor 3pt shooters.
To beat Miami.. let the Heat pay with having Duncan Robinson at PF by having more possessions with hurting them by grabbing more ORebs then play better defense on their shooters.
Stanford wrote:Let's say the Lakers win the title; what do you think would have happened? How'd they do it?
76ciology wrote:Interesting.
If you don’t run post plays for Embiid, how do you get him his points?
Pick and pop?
I don’t think he has “pogo stick” level athleticism to be a roll man.
And another thing, I find LeBron and Kawhi scoring the same way on isolation. They’ll try to shoot it, or blow by their guy, if the lane is denied then they’ll try to score it by the post. I think putting LeBron in that list is a stretch.