NoDopeOnSundays wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
You're ok with Mitch getting Clint Capela money, he absolutely needs to be able to score if he's getting that kind of money. If he cant you're better off going with a low salary center and spending that money on guards & wings.
Not a single one of the conference finalists had a center like Mitch making Capela money, that is what you all keep missing. A center making Clint Capela money is a net negative in the current NBA if they cannot score. I'd rather have KAT and all his awful defense than Gobert, because I'd be able to put players around KAT that can hide him, I'd even run zone.
On a per-36 min basis, Mitch averages 15pts, which is actually pretty good considering we haven't had passable PG play
I don't get how you can say that a player making Capela $ is a net negative. Do you have any evidence to back you up on this or are you just making a fictitious claim? Advanced stats prove that Capela and Mitch are winning players, those are the types of players who are typically valuable and worthy of paying.
Capela $$$ and a MAX contract are very different. it's only ~16% of the cap which is pretty reasonable for a starter
Those are per 36 numbers against mostly 2nd units, he's not going to average 16ppg with starters against other starting defenses.
Because that's $18 million that could be going to a skilled player, the fact that the Rockets got such terrible offers for Capela should tell you all you need to know. You can say it's a fiction, but the market for Capela was bad, case in point the Celtics could have traded for him, why didn't they? Advanced stats loved & still love Andre Drummond, all of those acronym stats paint Drummond out to being a winning player, we all know he's not.
I'd rather have a center like Theis on $5 million per year, than a center like Capela or Mitch for $18 million, because it means I'm probably spending my money somewhere else.
Mitch would make a good case on how to look at advanced stats.




























