Random Rumors and Trade Board General Thoughts Thread

Post #1201 » by **ThunderBolt** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:19 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=21

Not sure I believe it but I kind of like it if its true.

Post #1202 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:20 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=21

Not sure I believe it but I kind of like it if its true.

Basically where I am.

SNPA · Post #1203 » by **SNPA** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:20 pm

codydaze wrote:Amick saying there are issues with the Bogdan trade. This could just be a play to avoid tampering penalties though.

Read on Twitter

LOL.

Deal? No, there's no deal. Bogi didn't agree to a deal.

See NBA, no deal (wink, nod)

10 minutes after FA opens....deal complete.

Post #1204 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:23 pm

I don’t know anything about this guy. And obviously there are supposed to be some separations on SnTs and the draft. So... credible?

Read on Twitter

?s=21

goober · Post #1205 » by **goober** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:24 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=21

i would love that for the Mavs

Post #1206 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:24 pm

SNPA wrote:
codydaze wrote:Amick saying there are issues with the Bogdan trade. This could just be a play to avoid tampering penalties though.

Read on Twitter

LOL.

Deal? No, there's no deal. Bogi didn't agree to a deal.

See NBA, no deal (wink, nod)

10 minutes after FA opens....deal complete.

Yeah, worth pointing out this is coming from Amick who has historically been close to Sac. It feels very much a planted leak.

Post #1207 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:25 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
SNPA wrote:
codydaze wrote:Amick saying there are issues with the Bogdan trade. This could just be a play to avoid tampering penalties though.

Read on Twitter

LOL.

Deal? No, there's no deal. Bogi didn't agree to a deal.

See NBA, no deal (wink, nod)

10 minutes after FA opens....deal complete.

Yeah, worth pointing out this is coming from Amick who has historically been close to Sac. It feels very much a planted leak.

Unless the Bucks aren’t offering him enough money (and someone like ATL is) not sure why that wouldn’t be the perfect spot for Bogdan

wolves_89 · Post #1208 » by **wolves_89** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:26 pm

codydaze wrote:Amick saying there are issues with the Bogdan trade. This could just be a play to avoid tampering penalties though.

Read on Twitter

If Vlade was still in charge I'd find the rumor somewhat believable, but I would expect the new Kings front office to be more competent. This has the hallmarks of a leak to avoid the appearance of breaking league rules.

blind prophet · Post #1209 » by **blind prophet** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:34 pm

codydaze wrote:Amick saying there are issues with the Bogdan trade. This could just be a play to avoid tampering penalties though.

Read on Twitter

Oh boy, it would suck if he went somewhere and we got zilch to show for it.

kalenclayton · Post #1210 » by **kalenclayton** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:37 pm

blind prophet wrote:
codydaze wrote:Amick saying there are issues with the Bogdan trade. This could just be a play to avoid tampering penalties though.

Read on Twitter

Oh boy, it would suck if he went somewhere and we got zilch to show for it.

Well, we could always match.

Post #1211 » by **VCfor3** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:39 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=21

Not sure I believe it but I kind of like it if its true.

Basically where I am.

I feel like you have the picks to do it with 25, 28, and 34.

blind prophet · Post #1212 » by **blind prophet** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:47 pm

I guess if the Bucks do not pick up Ersan's option, then we know the Bogi trade is off? Think they have to before Friday right?

Post #1213 » by **Texas Chuck** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:47 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:I don’t know anything about this guy. And obviously there are supposed to be some separations on SnTs and the draft. So... credible?

Read on Twitter
?s=21

No idea, but obviously Dallas has been linked to Gallo in the past. If this is legit I guess Dallas is just all-in forever on offense.

SirChurros · Post #1214 » by **SirChurros** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:50 pm

This Bogdan thing makes zero sense. Like that would be new-level incompetence for both teams and that's pretty hard to do.

blind prophet · Post #1215 » by **blind prophet** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:51 pm

Krispy Kreme wrote:This Bogdan thing makes zero sense. Like that would be new-level incompetence for both teams and that's pretty hard to do.

Well one side could of leaked it and not the other.

Post #1216 » by **Texas Chuck** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:52 pm

Brad Townsend disputing Gallo/Dallas S&T

Jordan Syndrome · Post #1217 » by **Jordan Syndrome** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:55 pm

VCfor3 wrote:
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:Not sure I believe it but I kind of like it if its true.

Basically where I am.

I feel like you have the picks to do it with 25, 28, and 34.

To what? Who is trading out of the teens for that?

Post #1218 » by **loserX** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:56 pm

If OKC is spending cap on Horford, it's going to be increasingly hard for them to S&T Gallinari to anyone, let alone Dallas. They have some tightrope-walking to do.

Post #1219 » by **codydaze** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:57 pm

blind prophet wrote:
Krispy Kreme wrote:This Bogdan thing makes zero sense. Like that would be new-level incompetence for both teams and that's pretty hard to do.

Well one side could of leaked it and not the other.

I think someone above mentioned it too but it makes sense for Amick to report this since he's more plugged in with Sacramento and can help cover the tracks a bit.

Post #1220 » by **loserX** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:14 pm

loserX wrote:If OKC is spending cap on Horford, it's going to be increasingly hard for them to S&T Gallinari to anyone, let alone Dallas. They have some tightrope-walking to do.

On this note:

Read on Twitter