Tor_Raps wrote:mdenny wrote:Anyone who has been paying attention knew that we were taking a step back this year.
We're not gonna be second overall in the NBA every year. Cry about it.
The worst treadmill move would have been signing Serge and/or Marc (beyond this season) which would have limited our options going forward. Serge didn't want a one year contract. Marc didn't want to be a starting
We enjoyed having siakam and FVV at criminally undervalued salaries. This was the year that ended. Anyone paying attention knew it was coming.
We'll still be competitive but there's no chance in hell we place second overall. but relatively speaking....we're actually in an amazing spot to reload without having to suffer through 5 years of irrelevant basketball like most teams do after having an extended run of escalating quality.
Our 'step back' might only last a season. Not sure if people realize how rare that is.
Very insightful take. I disagree about the Ibaka part since re-signing him would have not ruined anything for us. He is an asset that almost every team would have traded for in the worst case. Guy was coming off his best season on the court and genuinely wanted to be here, which is a big problem for our city.
This might be an ugly season but things can change next offseason when we can go after tier 2 free agents and hope our young guys continue to grow. First things first, need to see Masai re-sign to actually believe.
Signing Obama would have taken away our max slot for next season. I get the point that we could have traded him...but i think this brings up an interpersonal factor at play that rarely gets mentioned.
Teams who recklessly sign players knowing full well they will trade them for cap space are the ones who get bad reps among players.
Ibaka choose where he went. If we signed him for two years (which he wanted) and dealt him he'd have to go where we could place him. We're already gonna have to send norm somewhere most likely.
I think the respectful thing to do is say "if you insist on 2 years you have to know that chances are high we trade you to clear cap space." In which case....I'm sure Ibaka would much rather choose where he goes rather than be at the mercy of the trade market.
There is a common talking point about "retaining assets because they are tradeable anyways". Take that thinking to it's logical extreme and a team's FO will get hated pretty quickly. You don't sign players while planning to trade them without telling them that. And it's likely when you tell them that... they will opt to choose their destination instead.
Edit: my spell checker keeps turning Ibaka into Obama lol