Frichuela wrote:Detroit plays so hard compared to our soft play...we are lottery bound if the attitude does not change drastically
Look at our roster, WTF kind of roster is this?
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Frichuela wrote:Detroit plays so hard compared to our soft play...we are lottery bound if the attitude does not change drastically
gambitx777 wrote:The 76ers are floating ben simmons in harden trades and asking the rockets to sweeten the pot lol !
dckingsfan wrote:gambitx777 wrote:The 76ers are floating ben simmons in harden trades and asking the rockets to sweeten the pot lol !
I wonder if a Harden for Hield and Barnes would be interesting to Houston. One trade where I think that both teams would win...
Hield and Barnes next to Wall would be quite good (IMO). And the Kings need a focus for their half-court offense.
verbal8 wrote:dckingsfan wrote:gambitx777 wrote:The 76ers are floating ben simmons in harden trades and asking the rockets to sweeten the pot lol !
I wonder if a Harden for Hield and Barnes would be interesting to Houston. One trade where I think that both teams would win...
Hield and Barnes next to Wall would be quite good (IMO). And the Kings need a focus for their half-court offense.
I think Hield will be very difficult to trade in a 2 team deal, due to his "Posion Pill" status for salary cap rules.
gambitx777 wrote:Really don't know what RHJ can't stick on a team ? Personality issues?
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
gambitx777 wrote:Really don't know what RHJ can't stick on a team ? Personality issues?
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
gambitx777 wrote:Yeah but athletic 25 year old good defenders are worth a spot on a team imo .
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
dckingsfan wrote:gambitx777 wrote:The 76ers are floating ben simmons in harden trades and asking the rockets to sweeten the pot lol !
I wonder if a Harden for Hield and Barnes would be interesting to Houston. One trade where I think that both teams would win...
Hield and Barnes next to Wall would be quite good (IMO). And the Kings need a focus for their half-court offense.
TGW wrote:Kuzma got 3 years, 40 mil. That's closer to what I thought Bertans deserved. But it's the Wizards...
Ruzious wrote:gambitx777 wrote:Yeah but athletic 25 year old good defenders are worth a spot on a team imo .
Not only that, RHJ's a pretty good ball-handler and passer with a 7'2 wingspan, has the strength to play some PF and the quickness to play the 3. He'll find an NBA job and will likely do well, imo.
Dat2U wrote:TGW wrote:Kuzma got 3 years, 40 mil. That's closer to what I thought Bertans deserved. But it's the Wizards...
Bertans has significantly more value than Kuz. Only reason we talk about a guy like Kuz so much is because he's with the Lakers.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Dat2U wrote:Ruzious wrote:gambitx777 wrote:Yeah but athletic 25 year old good defenders are worth a spot on a team imo .
Not only that, RHJ's a pretty good ball-handler and passer with a 7'2 wingspan, has the strength to play some PF and the quickness to play the 3. He'll find an NBA job and will likely do well, imo.
Your sacrificing as much if not more offense than the defensive contributions he can provide. Its like 4 vs 5 on the offensive end everytime he's out there.
TGW wrote:Dat2U wrote:TGW wrote:Kuzma got 3 years, 40 mil. That's closer to what I thought Bertans deserved. But it's the Wizards...
Bertans has significantly more value than Kuz. Only reason we talk about a guy like Kuz so much is because he's with the Lakers.
Eh I'm not so sure. Both are bench gunners that play no defense. Yes Bertans is better, but he's not 40 million better. No way.
TGW wrote:Dat2U wrote:TGW wrote:Kuzma got 3 years, 40 mil. That's closer to what I thought Bertans deserved. But it's the Wizards...
Bertans has significantly more value than Kuz. Only reason we talk about a guy like Kuz so much is because he's with the Lakers.
Eh I'm not so sure. Both are bench gunners that play no defense. Yes Bertans is better, but he's not 40 million better. No way.
TGW wrote:Kuzma got 3 years, 40 mil. That's closer to what I thought Bertans deserved. But it's the Wizards...