HarthorneWingo wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Chicahhhhgo hasn’t won squat with him.
We need Frank back.
You rather have Frank?
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
HarthorneWingo wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Chicahhhhgo hasn’t won squat with him.
We need Frank back.
Dave DaButcher wrote:?s=21
Nothing specific, but The Ringer’s Kevin O’Conner says a couple of the executives he surveyed see the Knicks as a sleeper team that could get involved in a “blockbuster” trade.
cgmw wrote:Basically, in conclusion: I'd like Dolan to get off my lawn.
Capn'O wrote:We're not the kid cousin. We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
cgmw wrote:Basically, in conclusion: I'd like Dolan to get off my lawn.
Capn'O wrote:We're not the kid cousin. We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
BBALLER4FR wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:WargamesX wrote:ATL just lost Bogdan to a long term injury.
If Burks comes back playing well I would try to flip him for either Reddish or Hunter and would even be willing to take on Snells expiring to make it happen. Reddish being the more likely one I could see them being open to trading.
Oh, you would?
cgmw wrote:Basically, in conclusion: I'd like Dolan to get off my lawn.
Capn'O wrote:We're not the kid cousin. We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Dave DaButcher wrote:?s=21
Nothing specific, but The Ringer’s Kevin O’Conner says a couple of the executives he surveyed see the Knicks as a sleeper team that could get involved in a “blockbuster” trade.
cgf wrote:Hopefully it's like the Hayward thing & strikeout because we're only interested if we can get a good deal...
I really hope we can keep things simple for a little bit. Sell off older vets (Burks/Bullock?) for picks if we're out of it by the deadline? Great. Sign a young FA like Lonzo Ball or Gary Trent Jr.? Awesome. But we need to see how this season (and the lottery) plays out before we'll know what kind of move we need. So let's keep our powder dry until we know what we're shooting for.
As things stand, the biggest thing I'd expect to want to see next summer -- other than an obvious ripoff -- would be trying to use those Mavs picks to snag a young PG to platoon with Quickley...but even that wouldn't make sense if the lotto gods hooked us up or Quickley looked like a budding-star by season's end.
HarthorneWingo wrote:cgf wrote:Hopefully it's like the Hayward thing & strikeout because we're only interested if we can get a good deal...
I really hope we can keep things simple for a little bit. Sell off older vets (Burks/Bullock?) for picks if we're out of it by the deadline? Great. Sign a young FA like Lonzo Ball or Gary Trent Jr.? Awesome. But we need to see how this season (and the lottery) plays out before we'll know what kind of move we need. So let's keep our powder dry until we know what we're shooting for.
As things stand, the biggest thing I'd expect to want to see next summer -- other than an obvious ripoff -- would be trying to use those Mavs picks to snag a young PG to platoon with Quickley...but even that wouldn't make sense if the lotto gods hooked us up or Quickley looked like a budding-star by season's end.
Hayward would've been perfect for us.
HarthorneWingo wrote:cgf wrote:Hopefully it's like the Hayward thing & strikeout because we're only interested if we can get a good deal...
I really hope we can keep things simple for a little bit. Sell off older vets (Burks/Bullock?) for picks if we're out of it by the deadline? Great. Sign a young FA like Lonzo Ball or Gary Trent Jr.? Awesome. But we need to see how this season (and the lottery) plays out before we'll know what kind of move we need. So let's keep our powder dry until we know what we're shooting for.
As things stand, the biggest thing I'd expect to want to see next summer -- other than an obvious ripoff -- would be trying to use those Mavs picks to snag a young PG to platoon with Quickley...but even that wouldn't make sense if the lotto gods hooked us up or Quickley looked like a budding-star by season's end.
Hayward would've been perfect for us.
cgf wrote:Dave DaButcher wrote:?s=21
Nothing specific, but The Ringer’s Kevin O’Conner says a couple of the executives he surveyed see the Knicks as a sleeper team that could get involved in a “blockbuster” trade.
*sigh* it was just a matter of time...
3toheadmelo wrote:What do you guys think we can get in a trade for Frank?
3toheadmelo wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Chicahhhhgo hasn’t won squat with him.
We need Frank back.
You rather have Frank?
thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:What do you guys think we can get in a trade for Frank?
High 2nd round pick. Maybe late first, depending on the team etc.
So, as high as 27 (less likely) to....36ish
Might get towards the higher end if the ask is for a pick 2 or 3 years from now.
I'd approve of moving Frank and DSJr in scenarios like this, where the pick gets into the late first because it's for 2024, 2025.
I get how that doesn't help "now" or even near future, like 2022, but again, I think a team is more willing to part with a pick 3 years away, the team has a lot of picks coming up in 2021/2022, and this gives the Knicks a chance to have multiple picks in multiple years moving forward.
Burks I'd extract a closer in years pick - 2021 or 2022
Bullocks same, though Knicks should just take whatever for him.
3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:What do you guys think we can get in a trade for Frank?
High 2nd round pick. Maybe late first, depending on the team etc.
So, as high as 27 (less likely) to....36ish
Might get towards the higher end if the ask is for a pick 2 or 3 years from now.
I'd approve of moving Frank and DSJr in scenarios like this, where the pick gets into the late first because it's for 2024, 2025.
I get how that doesn't help "now" or even near future, like 2022, but again, I think a team is more willing to part with a pick 3 years away, the team has a lot of picks coming up in 2021/2022, and this gives the Knicks a chance to have multiple picks in multiple years moving forward.
Burks I'd extract a closer in years pick - 2021 or 2022
Bullocks same, though Knicks should just take whatever for him.
It feels like Frank and DSJ are pretty much goners. I think we should honestly trade them for whatever we can get for them before they hit free agency. I’ll take any picks.
WargamesX wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:cgf wrote:Hopefully it's like the Hayward thing & strikeout because we're only interested if we can get a good deal...
I really hope we can keep things simple for a little bit. Sell off older vets (Burks/Bullock?) for picks if we're out of it by the deadline? Great. Sign a young FA like Lonzo Ball or Gary Trent Jr.? Awesome. But we need to see how this season (and the lottery) plays out before we'll know what kind of move we need. So let's keep our powder dry until we know what we're shooting for.
As things stand, the biggest thing I'd expect to want to see next summer -- other than an obvious ripoff -- would be trying to use those Mavs picks to snag a young PG to platoon with Quickley...but even that wouldn't make sense if the lotto gods hooked us up or Quickley looked like a budding-star by season's end.
Hayward would've been perfect for us.
Yeah, but Charlotte went in with that offer. Knicks were making a fair market offer, and Jordan took that personally and doubled it.
thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
Chicahhhhgo hasn’t won squat with him.
We need Frank back.
You rather have Frank?
RJ and Mavs 2023 pick for LaVine
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor