Dame and Giannis teaamup?

GrindCityHustle · Post #1 » by **GrindCityHustle** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:12 am

Would it be possible for Blazers for trade Lillard and land on the Bucks, Just wanted to see if this was possible before im laughed off the board.

GYK · Post #2 » by **GYK** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:14 am

More than likely not unless the Blazers are just being nice.

monopoman · Post #3 » by **monopoman** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:14 am

The only way this happens is if Lillard demands a trade and makes it clear he would prefer the Bucks. Neither team wants to trade the other one away since so far they are both extremely loyal and quite good.

I mean maybe they could pair up in Lillard's twilight years like 36+ or something but even that is a long shot.

Brandon-Clyde · Post #4 » by **Brandon-Clyde** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:14 am

Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

monopoman · Post #5 » by **monopoman** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:15 am

Brandon-Clyde wrote:Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

Even if they did could you ever imagine the Blazers trading Lillard away?

GrindCityHustle · Post #6 » by **GrindCityHustle** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:15 am

Brandon-Clyde wrote:Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

I just thought the might listen to something since CJ has taken a step up and they still want to develope Simons and Trent.

Raps in 4 · Post #7 » by **Raps in 4** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:15 am

The Bucks just traded 5 years of draft picks for Jrue. They have nothing left to offer.

Would be a fun pairing to watch though (and would win at least a few titles). Both guys would deserve it for not bolting from their small market teams when they had the chance.

Brandon-Clyde · Post #8 » by **Brandon-Clyde** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:16 am

monopoman wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

Even if they did could you ever imagine the Blazers trading Lillard away?

Nope

Brandon-Clyde · Post #9 » by **Brandon-Clyde** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:17 am

GrindCityHustle wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

I just thought the might listen to something since CJ has taken a step up and they still want to develope Simons and Trent.

You do not trade a player like Dame in hopes of developing Simons and Trent

gabri3l3 · Post #10 » by **gabri3l3** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:17 am

GrindCityHustle wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

I just thought the might listen to something since CJ has taken a step up and they still want to develope Simons and Trent.

so they trade they're perennial all-nba loyal superstar to develop anfernee freakin simons and gary freakin trent?

GrindCityHustle · Post #11 » by **GrindCityHustle** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:18 am

Brandon-Clyde wrote:
GrindCityHustle wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:Other than Giannis the Bucks have nothing that the Blazers would even consider trading Dame for.

I just thought the might listen to something since CJ has taken a step up and they still want to develope Simons and Trent.

You do not trade a player like Dame in hopes of developing Simons and Trent

Well Blazers keep Middleton and reroute Holiday in a potential trade. Pipe dream I know.

r0drig0lac · Post #12 » by **r0drig0lac** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:18 am

yes, please

thebigbird · Post #13 » by **thebigbird** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:18 am

With two Supermax contracts that team wouldn’t be able to afford any other players lol.

Roy The Natural · Post #14 » by **Roy The Natural** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 3:45 am

thebigbird wrote:With two Supermax contracts that team wouldn’t be able to afford any other players lol.

Don't the Nets now have a supermax and 2 max contracts. Isn't a supermax like 10% more than a max? They'd be fine.

Metallikid · Post #15 » by **Metallikid** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:05 am

Other way around. The Blazers have assets. The Bucks don't.

ADMVP · Post #16 » by **ADMVP** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:12 am

thebigbird wrote:With two Supermax contracts that team wouldn’t be able to afford any other players lol.

Rich Paul is laughing.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

HoopsterJones · Post #17 » by **HoopsterJones** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:14 am

Won’t happen because the Bucks do not have the assets for a trade.

DavidSterned · Post #18 » by **DavidSterned** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:17 am

Blazers and Bucks should just combine teams and split the home games. Both cities get the rings and half a banner.

JRoy · Post #19 » by **JRoy** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:17 am

There is no combination of MIL assets excluding GA that gets Lillard.

DOA

RoundMoundOfReb · Post #20 » by **RoundMoundOfReb** » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:18 am

Milwaukee has nothing left to trade. If a Lilard trade happens Philly makes some sense.