Bucksfan28 wrote:FrieAaron wrote:Bucksfan28 wrote:
Genuinely curious to hear what you're basing that on?
Khris is averaging 20.3/6.1/5.7 on 50/43/89 shooting and his team is 19-13
Tatum is averaging 26.1/6.4/4.6 on 44/37/87 shooting and his team is 15-17
So really the only argument for Tatums is that he averages 5.8 points more and .3 rebounds (on slightly more minutes per game). Khris is shooting better from everywhere on the floor, averaging more assists and is actually on a winning team.
So based on that you're saying there's no case for Tatum at all? I'd have to disagree.
I'm not the one that said there was no case for Tatum at all, but I guess I'm saying the entire case for Tatum is ppgz