UnFadeable21 wrote:Ant ranks 212 out of 213 for worst defense for SG and SF combined. He’s that bad.
To be that bad isn’t just low ball iq. That’s not giving a damn at all on defense.
I was simply commenting on his position, not his defense.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
UnFadeable21 wrote:Ant ranks 212 out of 213 for worst defense for SG and SF combined. He’s that bad.
To be that bad isn’t just low ball iq. That’s not giving a damn at all on defense.
winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Do you expect Edwards to cut out all mid-range shots?
Great point. Shots outside the paint and inside the 3 point line are not going to completely disappear. They should be taken judiciously and in a game where Ant took 31 shots 4 of them being from the in-between range seems judicious.
I expect them to last resort rather than a desired outcome. I just don’t get why you guys don’t seem to care that he only shot 5-17 from outside the paint. Look at his season averages and the numbers are clear. The jump shot is not his forte. Why you encourage a player who sucks at jump shooting (yes he sucks at jump shooting,) to keep doing it (often without passing or even trying to find a better shot,) is beyond me. Is it just because this is the Wolves and your happy for any degree of competency? You just seem to hold Ant to a different standard than anyone else in the team. Part of that is the rookie of it all, but at the same time it’s even more important for the rookies to make good decisions. If they learn to play the wrong way then it is that much harder to adjust to the right way. Ant taking a lot of jump shots is the wrong way.
_AIJ_ wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Since this is the OFFICIAL Anthony Edwards thread are we as a group OFFICIALLY glad we selected him #1 overall?
Sadly, not everyone here.
Jedzz wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Since this is the OFFICIAL Anthony Edwards thread are we as a group OFFICIALLY glad we selected him #1 overall?
Do we have to be, officially or not, just to post here according to you? I'm not sure the reason behind the question. Maybe it's just late and I shouldn't be reading still.
Slim Tubby wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Since this is the OFFICIAL Anthony Edwards thread are we as a group OFFICIALLY glad we selected him #1 overall?
I wanted Wiseman. I made that opinion very clear before the draft many times. I was wrong. Ant is special at 19 and still has a lot to learn. The derogatory, non-constructive criticism of him by a few posters on here is not only laughably insane but also incredibly obtuse and ignorant of what we should be expecting from a 19 year old that is only 30+ games into his NBA career.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_AIJ_ wrote:shrink wrote:With LaMelo out the rest of the season, favorite for ROY has to be Ant.
Correct. But you would really hate social media after he wins it. IF he wins it.
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Great point. Shots outside the paint and inside the 3 point line are not going to completely disappear. They should be taken judiciously and in a game where Ant took 31 shots 4 of them being from the in-between range seems judicious.
I expect them to last resort rather than a desired outcome. I just don’t get why you guys don’t seem to care that he only shot 5-17 from outside the paint. Look at his season averages and the numbers are clear. The jump shot is not his forte. Why you encourage a player who sucks at jump shooting (yes he sucks at jump shooting,) to keep doing it (often without passing or even trying to find a better shot,) is beyond me. Is it just because this is the Wolves and your happy for any degree of competency? You just seem to hold Ant to a different standard than anyone else in the team. Part of that is the rookie of it all, but at the same time it’s even more important for the rookies to make good decisions. If they learn to play the wrong way then it is that much harder to adjust to the right way. Ant taking a lot of jump shots is the wrong way.
Who's encouraging Ant to take bad shots? I haven't seen anybody encouraging him to take bad shots.
KGdaBom wrote:_AIJ_ wrote:shrink wrote:With LaMelo out the rest of the season, favorite for ROY has to be Ant.
Correct. But you would really hate social media after he wins it. IF he wins it.
I think LaMelo is still the favorite. He's more of a media darling than Ant. Time will tell.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
KGdaBom wrote:Jedzz wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Since this is the OFFICIAL Anthony Edwards thread are we as a group OFFICIALLY glad we selected him #1 overall?
Do we have to be, officially or not, just to post here according to you? I'm not sure the reason behind the question. Maybe it's just late and I shouldn't be reading still.
Jedzz no we don't have to be. I was asking a question. The reason behind the question was to get an answer to the question. I was truly curious about if we were no happy with the choice. I didn't ask it to get a snide response from you.
winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:
I expect them to last resort rather than a desired outcome. I just don’t get why you guys don’t seem to care that he only shot 5-17 from outside the paint. Look at his season averages and the numbers are clear. The jump shot is not his forte. Why you encourage a player who sucks at jump shooting (yes he sucks at jump shooting,) to keep doing it (often without passing or even trying to find a better shot,) is beyond me. Is it just because this is the Wolves and your happy for any degree of competency? You just seem to hold Ant to a different standard than anyone else in the team. Part of that is the rookie of it all, but at the same time it’s even more important for the rookies to make good decisions. If they learn to play the wrong way then it is that much harder to adjust to the right way. Ant taking a lot of jump shots is the wrong way.
Who's encouraging Ant to take bad shots? I haven't seen anybody encouraging him to take bad shots.
Go back through the thread right after the 42 point game.
Jedzz wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Jedzz wrote:
Do we have to be, officially or not, just to post here according to you? I'm not sure the reason behind the question. Maybe it's just late and I shouldn't be reading still.
Jedzz no we don't have to be. I was asking a question. The reason behind the question was to get an answer to the question. I was truly curious about if we were no happy with the choice. I didn't ask it to get a snide response from you.
Snide? I'm no english major obviously. But your post could be taken different ways. I also suggested I might not be reading it correctly...did you miss that? Bark bark bark. I just don't approve of group think pressure so when you bring up official group thoughts and allcap the word I wanted to at least get to the bottom of that. I couldn't tell if you were just asking a question or if the all cap official word meant something more such as only Ant approval letters should be posted here.
Merc_Porto wrote:In a redraft you take LaMelo 100 times out of 100. Geeez how is that even a question. Only on this board i see
Merc_Porto wrote:In a redraft you take LaMelo 100 times out of 100. Geeez how is that even a question. Only on this board i see
Calinks wrote:I'm still unsure about Edwards. I'd take Ball if it was a redraft, he's just ahead of Edwards right now. Wiseman, I don't know. Edwards has huge boom potential but he's very far away IQ wise, if he figures it out then I think he has a higher ceiling to affect winning than any of these other guys but that's a big if.
I can understand why Rosas made the pick, it's a gamble but if it pays off you have the most important piece you need for a modern NBA team.
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Who's encouraging Ant to take bad shots? I haven't seen anybody encouraging him to take bad shots.
Go back through the thread right after the 42 point game.
I read them all. I didn't see one person say Ant should take bad shots. Maybe I missed it.
winforlose wrote:I was gonna write something about his numbers and shot selection, but I changed my mind. You praise him for the points but ignore the efficiency. You praise him for his attitude but ignore the defense and the fact that he often appears happy when things are going wrong. People here praise him for his shot form but he is terrible jump shooter by the numbers. I see a ton of potential in Ant, but he will only unlock it by doing the right things. You tell me, has he looked good the last two games?
KGdaBom wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:In a redraft you take LaMelo 100 times out of 100. Geeez how is that even a question. Only on this board i see
Only in your mind. It is far from obvious.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves