_AIJ_ wrote:I still think we will end up with Collins
I don't.
I imagine any moves will be to shuffle contracts or for future picks.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
_AIJ_ wrote:I still think we will end up with Collins
winforlose wrote:
Isn’t he the guy who said he wanted to play next to KAT
jpatrick wrote:winforlose wrote:
Isn’t he the guy who said he wanted to play next to KAT
Lol. You can’t take anything Collins says seriously, about KAT or ATL. He wants to play where they will give him a max contract and enough shots so he can get a second max contract.


Calinks wrote:It's a tough spot to get any big-name player. The asking price is really high and we may not want to sell one of our assets for a so-so return. Beasley is very tradable but again, he has a ton of value to our team right now. Gordon is a guy who maybe brings us more value, so maybe we do that but a move like Collins involving Beasley is a gamble IMO.
Collins seems like a really good fit but paying him a max (or at the least a contract much higher than Beasley's) seems like a bad idea if we got Russell and Towns under max deals. We can't bring in any more max players and it may be hard to move Collins or Russell in the future.
Also the chance that Collins walks, then we lose out big on the value scale as we have up a pure shooter/scorer that we really need and maybe other assets.
I could see some low level guys shifting around. Like another Jauncho like trade where we bring in an under-the-radar PF and hope they fit in well. Don't think a big move is happening but could see a small one involving fringe guys.
winforlose wrote:Calinks wrote:It's a tough spot to get any big-name player. The asking price is really high and we may not want to sell one of our assets for a so-so return. Beasley is very tradable but again, he has a ton of value to our team right now. Gordon is a guy who maybe brings us more value, so maybe we do that but a move like Collins involving Beasley is a gamble IMO.
Collins seems like a really good fit but paying him a max (or at the least a contract much higher than Beasley's) seems like a bad idea if we got Russell and Towns under max deals. We can't bring in any more max players and it may be hard to move Collins or Russell in the future.
Also the chance that Collins walks, then we lose out big on the value scale as we have up a pure shooter/scorer that we really need and maybe other assets.
I could see some low level guys shifting around. Like another Jauncho like trade where we bring in an under-the-radar PF and hope they fit in well. Don't think a big move is happening but could see a small one involving fringe guys.
Rosas might have a questionable history at the top of the draft but he has an eye for talent elsewhere. He saw Beasley and moved to get him. I wonder if there is another similar player who is being underutilized who Rosas might trade for. The good news is we don’t have to wait long to find out.
One other thing to consider. While trading now and helping to develop chemistry during meaningless games is valuable, knowing if you get your draft pick next year is also valuable. Moving Ricky has more value now, but others moves might wait until after the lottery.

_AIJ_ wrote:I still think we will end up with Collins
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Neeva wrote:winforlose wrote:Calinks wrote:It's a tough spot to get any big-name player. The asking price is really high and we may not want to sell one of our assets for a so-so return. Beasley is very tradable but again, he has a ton of value to our team right now. Gordon is a guy who maybe brings us more value, so maybe we do that but a move like Collins involving Beasley is a gamble IMO.
Collins seems like a really good fit but paying him a max (or at the least a contract much higher than Beasley's) seems like a bad idea if we got Russell and Towns under max deals. We can't bring in any more max players and it may be hard to move Collins or Russell in the future.
Also the chance that Collins walks, then we lose out big on the value scale as we have up a pure shooter/scorer that we really need and maybe other assets.
I could see some low level guys shifting around. Like another Jauncho like trade where we bring in an under-the-radar PF and hope they fit in well. Don't think a big move is happening but could see a small one involving fringe guys.
Rosas might have a questionable history at the top of the draft but he has an eye for talent elsewhere. He saw Beasley and moved to get him. I wonder if there is another similar player who is being underutilized who Rosas might trade for. The good news is we don’t have to wait long to find out.
One other thing to consider. While trading now and helping to develop chemistry during meaningless games is valuable, knowing if you get your draft pick next year is also valuable. Moving Ricky has more value now, but others moves might wait until after the lottery.
Horton-Tucker, Doumbouya, Toppin?
Klomp wrote:_AIJ_ wrote:I still think we will end up with Collins
Yeah the Collins front is eerily quiet
Baseline81 wrote:
ChiefKeith91 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:
This shouldn’t couldn’t as a surprise to anyone. The core of him KAT and Ant doesn’t have enough sample size yet.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
ChiefKeith91 wrote:Baseline81 wrote:
This shouldn’t couldn’t as a surprise to anyone. The core of him KAT and Ant doesn’t have enough sample size yet.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves