M-C-G wrote:ABucksFan wrote:emunney wrote:
Why?
I know what I'm getting with Teague (not much), With Knight I am inclined to think there is some upside there with age and well...we haven't seen much of him lately. Defintleyy could be worse than Teague, but the he could also potentially be better.
I think with Teague, knowing the system and being a better defender (or at least I remember him being a decent defender) adds more value. I am not so sure we are looking for an upside play as much as a reliable play.
Rivers is probably your upside play. Hope things click from 3 and you have an off the street version of Brogdan with his shoot3/take it to the rim shot selection.
Yep, I agree very fair points. I did want Rivers over Teague as well.






















