Rapinoe vs Green... who you got?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Who you got in this fight

Rapinoe
54
26%
Draymond
150
74%
 
Total votes: 204

User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,830
And1: 4,837
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#81 » by snaquille oatmeal » Thu Apr 8, 2021 6:49 pm

tbhawksfan1 wrote:
snaquille oatmeal wrote:
tbhawksfan1 wrote:
I appreciate the idea and you're right about her position, but instead of revising my original post, I'll just let interested people read the thread and get all the interesting info from multiple good posts such as yours.
the reason for my post was that your original post is misleading as to what the beef is between those two. You are missing important information about the argument they are having.


If you don't mind, I copy pasted your info to OP post. If it's a problem I'll delete


You know the interesting part of them being put against each other by the media is that Green has said that women in sports are underpaid and agrees with Meghan and she has actually praised him for being involved in the cause.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,529
And1: 8,075
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#82 » by G35 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 6:51 pm

One of the changes I have seen from the modern generation is that anyone fighting for a cause tries to get as many people/groups to help fight their fight. They do this in a number of ways:

- shaming
- demanding
- cancel culture
- fake news

Believe it or not, care or not, everyone does not have unlimited time, patience, resources to fight and advocate for all of these interest groups.

There is a fight we are having right now and is between authoritarianism and freedom...in many people's minds they feel they are on the side of freedom and justice. Freedom just does not cut one way, there is freedom to listen to someone's ideas and there is freedom to not have to listen to someone's ideas.

There is something called the Good Samaritan law and here is the verbiage:

https://valientemott.com/blog/good-samaritan-act-laws/#:~:text=The%20Good%20Samaritan%20Act%20is,life%2Dor%2Ddeath%20situation.

The Good Samaritan Act is a law which protects any volunteer giving aid to an injured person in an emergency situation. The Good Samaritan Law offers legal protection in the form of exemption from lawsuits and liability, acting as a safeguard to those who help another in a real emergency, life-or-death situation. The law is in place so that bystanders do not feel reluctant to help out because of the risk of litigation later.

The main purpose of Good Samaritan Laws are to encourage people to act when they find themselves in the position of a bystander in an emergency situation. The law encourages altruism in each one of us. Before the law was established, it was found that people, in an ever-increasingly litigious society, were reluctant to come to the aid of others for fear of exposing themselves to litigation.


There are two issues, when you decide to help someone and things may not turn out the way you would like and the person you tried to help decides to sue you or come after you for not helping them in a way they wanted you to.

The other issue is the duty to rescue law, there are is no legal obligation for anyone to have to rescue or save another party.

What many people are advocating is that their moral values require you to help others. That is false, you do not have to help someone if you do not want to, despite the authoritarianism that is going around that you have to help others. You do not. I go back to my original points how people try to force you to help them with their causes through shaming, demanding, etc by trying to take some moral high ground.

Morals are different from person to person, you cannot force your morals on individuals or society at large, if someone would like to help a cause then more power to them, but it is a form authoritarianism that is trying to force others to their cause.

That is one of the reasons why many people have immigrated from other countries is this forced behavior.

TL;DR Stop trying to pull other people into your causes...especially lost causes, Draymond tried to help and gave his two cents and Rapinoe didn't like it.
I'm so tired of the typical......
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 67,152
And1: 62,001
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#83 » by Raps in 4 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 6:51 pm

Pg81 wrote:Women want equal pay? Well maybe start bringing a similar performance as men and not lose to U15 boys as a national team. Stuff is plain embarassing. Or tennis were the women play somewhere around half the time men play.


If as much money was thrown at girl's sports as boy's, and if girls could see themselves making a sustainable living as professional athletes (why would any girl want to become a professional athlete when the pay is so meagre?), perhaps there would be more skilled female athletes.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,803
And1: 22,723
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#84 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Apr 8, 2021 6:54 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:I'm not comparing salaries. I'm talking about things the NBA invests resources in that aren't revenue generating.


Makes sense, I'd point out though that the NBA is already presumably making the investments they see as worthwhile for their own self-interests and that a labor dispute with WNBA players would be about something beyond this, and that's where things get tricky.

If I'm trying to make investments to help a particular group and that group begins fighting against me then I'm forced to think about those athletes as management always looks at labor first and foremost.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
tbhawksfan1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,305
And1: 2,674
Joined: May 23, 2015

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#85 » by tbhawksfan1 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 6:55 pm

DubTheVanDamage wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:If you listen to what each of them actually said, she is in the right. But mind you that's way different from what this discussion will boil down to which is women's sports suck and don't generate revenue so shut up.

But I hope some people will take the time to actually read the quotes before their usual lazy commentary. Several female athletes actually engaged with him in very meaningful ways to acknowledge some of what he said while correcting him on the areas he missed on.

It spurred a good dialogue, but we won't have it here sadly.


How is your response spurring a good dialogue? You flat declare Rapinoe right, but don't say why or how.

So, here are the quotes for context:

Green said:

"As long as y'all make the argument about pay, while the revenue stays the same... They will continue to point at the revenue not being high enough to cover bigger salaries. While that is true in damn near every business, how do we take that card out of their pockets? That's the key to changing the pay. There's no argument for lack of revenue, unless... You make those that say they stand for women actually stand up."


He then said:
"The NBA wasn't always the global game that it is today. It wasn't always driving as much revenue as it does today. But there were people behind it, building the platform, and more importantly telling INDIVIDUAL...stories and building up the interest in the players. That's how the game took off. Who's building up y'all platform? Who's telling the individual stories of how great y'all are? Building the interest and transforming women's basketball into a global game?"


Rapinoe's response:
"It's really unfortunate, in the position [Green's] in, having all of the resources that he has and the ability to have a much more educated opinion, that he just hasn't. And then, drag all these other people into it by tagging them and speaking at a time when the [NCAA] tournament is going on and all that we saw with the lack of resources and funding."


Her first response to to claim that an opposing view is "uneducated" and that Draymond doesn't understand what Rapinoe and other female athletes talk about. If Rapinoe disagreed with anything Draymond said, she could have countered them, but this sort of broad, dismissive response is intellectually dishonest, self righteous, and quite offensive. I find it surreal that you're standing up and clapping for this sort of marginalization.

She continued:
"That's frustrating that's the take you have. You obviously showed your whole ass in not even understanding what we all talk about all the time -- WNBA players and us on the national team. Like what Sue [Bird] said, you tagged the wrong people. You don't think we asked for more money? I mean, what are we screaming about? Nonstop!"


More talk that Green doesn't understand. Poor, uneducated fool... and the fact that Rapinoe is defending her girlfriend -- no, there is no bias here.

The true irony is this -- Rapinoe actually didn't bother to read what Draymond wrote. She said, "You don't think we asked for more money?" when that was exactly the point Green made -- asking for money without increasing the revenue pool won't work.

Finally, on a (slightly) more constructive note, Megan said:
"When we talk about equality and women's sports, we always talk first about investment, and funding and resources and marketing and branding and investing in not just the players but the support staff and coaching and media, TV media, print media, all of it," she said. "Those are the things that we talk about first, and I think anybody who watches us or follows us, or really has skin in the game and equal pay or equality in that sense, knows that that's what we talk about first."


This is where she more directly addressed Draymond's comments -- although, again, I think she missed the mark. She is asking for investment -- expecting other people to step up when Draymond's message was do it yourself.

As a final note, attendance for the WNBA has pretty much declined since its inception -- the league peaked at an average of 10.8k fans in its second year and was down to 6.5k in 2019. The league loses money -- pretty clearly, the approach to market the league hasn't worked. Megan is naively demanding more investment in a dying, loss making business.

NBA players have, overall, done an excellent job off the court, both in promoting themselves, building businesses, and speaking out. Instead of shrilly castigating Draymond for giving his advice, why not say, "Ok, show us how to do it. Let's team up."

The WNBA's approach, including that of the players, simply hasn't worked. It's foolish to think, given the long-term decline the league is experiencing, that continuing to do the same thing will lead to different results. Also, Draymond, and many of his friends (including James and Curry) -- could do a lot to help and mentor WNBA players. Perhaps Bird and the other WNBA players should have spent less time "correcting" and more time collaborating.


Draymond has had zero to do with the NBA's succes and the revenue generated. You don't have to go back too many years to a time when the NBA and ABA were not so profitable. Economics is always an unlevel playing field. He (she) who does it first will always have a big advantage that is nearly impossible to overcome. Take a look at anti-trust laws and you can get an idea of how much market share can squeeze out competition
User avatar
Ryoga Hibiki
RealGM
Posts: 12,649
And1: 7,801
Joined: Nov 14, 2001
Location: Warszawa now, but from Northern Italy

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#86 » by Ryoga Hibiki » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:00 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:There is nothing fundamentally unique about women's tennis that makes it more interesting to watch than any other sport. The difference is that women's tennis programs get a ton of funding, which results in the development of high quality athletes. Other women's sports are decidedly lacking in talent.

no, tennis is a very different sport that requires a different kind of athleticism that allows women to provide a high quality product comparable to the men one.
Even 40 years ago, when there was less money around, you could see it in the way the likes of Evert or Navratilova used to play.
Basketball becomes some thing completely different, though, as the whole above the rim component of it gets lost.

Sent from my Nokia 3210 using RealGM mobile app
Слава Украине!
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,803
And1: 22,723
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#87 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:01 pm

Ryoga Hibiki wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:If you listen to what each of them actually said, she is in the right. But mind you that's way different from what this discussion will boil down to which is women's sports suck and don't generate revenue so shut up.

But I hope some people will take the time to actually read the quotes before their usual lazy commentary. Several female athletes actually engaged with him in very meaningful ways to acknowledge some of what he said while correcting him on the areas he missed on.

It spurred a good dialogue, but we won't have it here sadly.
to be honest, every argument I heard so far has been ridiculously weak.
I don't get why the normal negotiation process and market dynamics shouldn't apply here

Sent from my Nokia 3210 using RealGM mobile app


Because the WNBA has no classical labor power.

The idea of a work stoppage is that the organization in question will be crippled by the loss of work, but the NBA's bottom line would be just fine if the WNBA ceased to exist.

While the WNBA might be able to leverage public opinion to shame the NBA into caving, in terms of direct economic power, the WNBA just doesn't have it.

I want to be clear that I think it's unwise for the NBA to squeeze the WNBA player salaries as hard as it theoretically could, but the WNBA players are in an odd place precisely because the league is under the thumb of the NBA. And of course that's not a coincidence, the way the WNBA was able to come to dominate women's pro basketball in the US in the first place was because it had the backing of the NBA. By the NBA doing this they basically destroyed the possibility of a class athletic labor-management relationship.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Danimals
Junior
Posts: 404
And1: 143
Joined: May 05, 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#88 » by Danimals » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:02 pm

Equal investment and return should be made at all levels that utilize public funds, beginning with public athletic programs for toddlers all the way on up to professional sports.

The fallacy that men’s sports are better or more entertaining is something we have all been indoctrinated into by sexist stereotypes present throughout our education.
Steph Curry—————Ricky
Michael Jordan———Ant
Lebron James————KG
Kevin Garnett————Love
Nikola Jokic—————KAT
Roddy B for 3
Analyst
Posts: 3,544
And1: 1,042
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
       

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#89 » by Roddy B for 3 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:04 pm

Lunartic wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
shakes0 wrote:

It has nothing to do with whether or not women can compete with men in a sport. Only thing that matters is the revenue their sport (business) generates. If womens' tennis makes as much revenue as mens then of course they deserve equal pay.

That's obviously not the case with NBA vs WNBA.


And why is women's tennis more popular than the WNBA?

It's because the quality of women's tennis is generally much higher than the quality on display in the WNBA. That quality discrepancy exists because women's basketball is poorly funded, leading to a lack of player development.


Perhaps it's due to a multitude of reasons? "funding" doesn't make a sport interesting. It doesn't increase the talent level suddenly.

I enjoy watching tennis becuase I enjoy looking at attractive women playing a finesse game. WNBA is not my cup of tea, I don't really find their level of play to be impressive and I don't find them attractive. WNBA is unpopular in entire world, whereas women's tennis has a large following internationally. The quality discrepancy has more to do with a lack of interest in WNBA, a lack of innate talent, a lack of innate very tall females and overall it's not a very feminine sport.

Funding may play a role but overall, the WNBA is a chore to watch. If you invested 20 billion dollars into it this week the product wouldn't magically improve.


Funding absolutely makes a difference. Terrible ideas make money all the time because of funding. Turbo tax spending money lobbying the U.S. government to have citizens fill out their own taxs makes Turbo Tax "brinks trucks" of money.

The Kardashians are famous simply for being famous. Skip Bayless is rich because he gets his voice out (through funding), etc.

And fwiw I find NBA games hard to watch, due to referring, mostly. But, I really enjoy watching WNBA games (which are almost never on). If I was flipping through the channels and WNBA was on TBS and NBA was on TNT I'd probably be going back in fourth.

And as far as the attraction level for tennis vs WNBA. Watching a bunch of women smiling and getting emotional is much more attractive than watching men do the same.

I also enjoy how women's basketball is a slower tempo and executed very well.
7/1/2019
(I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)
Pg81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 2,662
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#90 » by Pg81 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:05 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:Women want equal pay? Well maybe start bringing a similar performance as men and not lose to U15 boys as a national team. Stuff is plain embarassing. Or tennis were the women play somewhere around half the time men play.


If as much money was thrown at girl's sports as boy's, and if girls could see themselves making a sustainable living as professional athletes (why would any girl want to become a professional athlete when the pay is so meagre?), perhaps there would be more skilled female athletes.


That kind of money was not there from the beginning. Most sports started very humble with athletes often having to work alongside and grew over many decades, in football it took almost a century. Most money is gained through revenue and sponsorship now. The last football world cup the men teams generated a combined 6 billion, the woman over 110 million. Relatively speaking Men earned got less than 10% of that revenue while women got almost 25%. Wanting the same amount than men is ridiculous, the football organizations would have to pump in far more money than the women generate.
Oh and let us not forget that women get a basic income of 100k while men get nothing yet women like Rapinoe also want all the bonuses men make while retaining the basic income. Double standards nothing more.
If you're asking me who the Mavs best player is, I'd say Luka. A guy like Delon Wright probably rivals his impact though at this stage in his career. KP may as well if he gets his **** together.
GeorgeMarcus, 17/11/2019
MrPerfect1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,372
And1: 3,433
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#91 » by MrPerfect1 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:05 pm

The Women's Team turned down the exact same Offer as the Men's Team. They wanted a less risky CBA with higher Guaranteed Money.

After winning the World Cup, it turned out that they would have made more money if they had selected the Risky CBA that the Men selected.
User avatar
Dick Tate
Analyst
Posts: 3,414
And1: 2,981
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#92 » by Dick Tate » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:05 pm

Supply vs Demand is such a basic concept. Women's tennis majors get high ratings, therefore they get paid. Soccer or WNBA, not so much.
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,861
And1: 20,324
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#93 » by Optms » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:06 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:Women want equal pay? Well maybe start bringing a similar performance as men and not lose to U15 boys as a national team. Stuff is plain embarassing. Or tennis were the women play somewhere around half the time men play.


If as much money was thrown at girl's sports as boy's, and if girls could see themselves making a sustainable living as professional athletes, perhaps there would be more skilled female athletes.


And there is a good reason not nearly as much money is invested into female sports. Its because little girls (generally) aren't keen on competitive competition as much as boys are. This isn't some evil conspiracy plan perpetrated over centuries of human civilization. Boys and girls are just different. Not just from a physical perspective but also a characteristic point of view.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,773
And1: 99,322
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#94 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:06 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:I'm not comparing salaries. I'm talking about things the NBA invests resources in that aren't revenue generating.


Makes sense, I'd point out though that the NBA is already presumably making the investments they see as worthwhile for their own self-interests and that a labor dispute with WNBA players would be about something beyond this, and that's where things get tricky.

If I'm trying to make investments to help a particular group and that group begins fighting against me then I'm forced to think about those athletes as management always looks at labor first and foremost.


Of course.

But on the other hand labor sometimes feels like they have to make a lot of noise to get management's attention. But there will always be a battle there. Even in the NBA which has one of the best management/players relationships going in professional sports, both sides are always going to be pushing for more money, more concessions.

And I want to be clear, I'm not saying the WNBA should be raising salaries. I honestly don't know. But I'm coming to this issue with the assumption that the NBA continues to be committed to the WNBA. And I think there is a real argument to be made that the NBA "wins" by paying these women more money. The cost would continue to be relatively minor especially divided 30 ways and there would be benefits both tangible and non almost immediately.

On the flip side, there is a real argument to be made that they have given this league a long time to show profitability and that the market has clearly spoken that its not self-sustaining. And that while they might be sympathetic to female basketball players they really have no obligation to subsidize a league.

Those are questions for the NBA and its governors to decide. Personally I think its still worth doing and that the NBA benefits from the league, but if they ultimately reached a different conclusion I'd respect that decision.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
CIN-C-STAR
General Manager
Posts: 8,439
And1: 18,310
Joined: Dec 17, 2017

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#95 » by CIN-C-STAR » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:07 pm

Poll should have an option for both make good points, or neither made a good point.
I vote neither.
"I'd rather have Kevin Love spacing out to the three point line than anything (Karl) Malone brings"
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,803
And1: 22,723
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#96 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:08 pm

BK_2020 wrote:Women's tennis is about as far from finesse as you can get. They just hit it back as hard as they can and hope the other player is the first one to sail one 20 feet beyond the baseline.
There's nothing except stereotypes supporting the notion that men's tennis is about power and women's tennis is about skill and touch. It's the opposite.


Hmm, there's a discussion to be had here but you're oversimplifying.

About 20 years ago the men's game was getting crippled by power and the women's game was more interesting. This was caused by racket technology which made women more powerful but made men too powerful. You were seeing guys win on grass who couldn't do anything except serve.

2 things changed that as I see it: 1) They changed the surfaces to slow down the game (except on clay, which was already slow as molasses), and 2) the next generation of players learned to be able to react fast enough to return those super-fast shots.

The result then is that while power in real ways still rules the men's game, the issues of "I only serve" dominance went away.

At that point the fact that there are just more top level male players than female players allowed greater physical dominance at the top by someone like Serena than we've seen from someone on the men's side.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,773
And1: 99,322
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#97 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:12 pm

DubTheVanDamage wrote:
NBA players have, overall, done an excellent job off the court, both in promoting themselves, building businesses, and speaking out. Instead of shrilly castigating Draymond for giving his advice, why not say, "Ok, show us how to do it. Let's team up."



Not a fan of the "shrilly" word choice as that language damages some good points you are otherwise making. Not trying to be all PC, just pointing out the clear connotation of that word.

But part of this is the Megan Rapinoe package, right? She's not perfect. She speaks too quickly, she's bold and aggressive. She's defending the woman she loves, etc....

But lots of WNBA players responded exactly as you wanted her to--you know the people more directly impacted. They asked him those very questions and he had nothing publicly to say in response. Now it wouldn't surprise me at all if he didn't reach out privately to some individuals. As I've stated all along, I think his intentions weren't bad. But he definitely spoke out of turn and we've seen him repeatedly take issue when others do the same to him. So of course he was going to get some backlash.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,698
And1: 13,253
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#98 » by zeebneeb » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:15 pm

Danimals wrote:Equal investment and return should be made at all levels that utilize public funds, beginning with public athletic programs for toddlers all the way on up to professional sports.

The fallacy that men’s sports are better or more entertaining is something we have all been indoctrinated into by sexist stereotypes present throughout our education.
I've been sitting here enjoying the back and forth, content not to comment until this pile of garbage.

This is exactly the type of person that ruins a good conversation with claims of your the problem because of indoctrination, or your ignorant.

How about women's sports are just not that much fun to watch, especially the WNBA? I love the game of basketball but I would much rather watch men play it for a myriad of reasons, none of which have anything to do with sexist stereotypes. Men are faster and stronger and play the game well above the rim, and with a physicality that cannot be matched by female athletes.

Biology isn't sexist.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,111
And1: 70,267
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#99 » by clyde21 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:15 pm

Danimals wrote:Equal investment and return should be made at all levels that utilize public funds, beginning with public athletic programs for toddlers all the way on up to professional sports.

The fallacy that men’s sports are better or more entertaining is something we have all been indoctrinated into by sexist stereotypes present throughout our education.


oh yes, that's the only reason I enjoy the NBA much more than the WNBA, I've conditioned and indoctrinated into believing it. :lol:
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 67,152
And1: 62,001
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Rapinoe vs Green... who you got? 

Post#100 » by Raps in 4 » Thu Apr 8, 2021 7:16 pm

Optms wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
Pg81 wrote:Women want equal pay? Well maybe start bringing a similar performance as men and not lose to U15 boys as a national team. Stuff is plain embarassing. Or tennis were the women play somewhere around half the time men play.


If as much money was thrown at girl's sports as boy's, and if girls could see themselves making a sustainable living as professional athletes, perhaps there would be more skilled female athletes.


And there is a good reason not nearly as much money is invested into female sports. Its because little girls (generally) aren't keen on competitive competition as much as boys are.


Because they are socialized not to be keen on it. And there isn't a future in it. Boys can make a living playing sports. Girls would have a much harder time doing the same.

This isn't some evil conspiracy plan perpetrated over centuries of human civilization. Boys and girls are just different. Not just from a physical perspective but also a characteristic point of view.


It most certainly is. Gender roles have been enforced since the beginning of time. They shape our "characteristics". Male dominance in society is an extension of men's physical dominance over women.

Return to The General Board