Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)

[Warriors Analyst]

They are the only fans on here who do this type of stuff. I remember one of them saying that “ y’all should start a Warriors hate group” and he started listing all the names. Another Warriors fan said that everyone who post anti Curry comments said that are all burner accounts of her each other. “Warriors analyst” doesn’t even come on threads to comment anymore. He just comes on threads to say “these are the people who hate Curry” and he will just start naming off names.

Not all but most Warriors fans on here do stuff like you were saying in your post.

Have you ever made a factual post? Warriors fans are "the only fans on here" who call out posters for going overboard on their negativity towards a specific player?

LOL.

Yeah, I've never seen haters of LeBron, Kobe, Kyrie, etc. called out by their fans on the RealGM General Board.

You've posted a lot of ridiculous things on here Rod, but that takes the cake. You've out-done yourself this time.

Bruh I fixed you in our last debate but we won’t get into that. Let me explain further on how I mean Warriors fans take things more personal.

Agree that other fans on here call out people too but their responses will be the typical “you’re delusional” or “your stupid” type of comment. Warriors fan take things to another level. They say things like “y’all should start a Warriors hate group”. He listed the names and everything. That’s why I could understand what Marcusss mean by keeping track of names. I never seen a Lebron fan or fan of other player team say something like that before on here. I never seen anyone say “start a Lebron hate group”. Other Warriors fans on here egged on the hate group comment too.

Another example is when a Warriors fan on here said that everyone who is Anti Warriors or Anti Curry are all burner accounts of each other. One of the dumbest comments I ever read on here but Warriors egged that comment on too. Never heard a Lebron fan call anti Lebron people burner accounts of each other on here. Same with other players and teams.

Your buddy Warriors Analyst barely even talks about basketball on here anymore. He just comes on threads just to list the names of people who don’t like Curry.

It just seems like yall be taking things too personal sometimes. Your whole “what have you said factual comment” shows that. Y’all just start saying outrageous things whenever it’s someone that’s anti Curry.

I've pointed out in several threads that you and a few other posters go out of their way to bump threads that are dead in order to bash Curry, which means you're either going through pages upon pages of GB topics to find the topic of your choice or you're using the search bar to look up threads with Curry in the the title. In either case, it shows unhealthy interest in dregging up your preferred topics of choice.

As for me, I know you have no interest in responding to my posts, but most of them involve numbers or opinions about the Warriors lineups' and Curry's performance. It's ok though, I don't expect you to engage with those posts in good faith.

[VancouverRaps]

How is this still even being discussed?

*CTRL+F: LeBron*

*28 matches found on this page*

Nevermind, makes sense

[Roger Murdock]

I love the 'hes overrated cause they aren't in the playoffs' argument like we haven't see carry teams to championships and historic highs when his teammates are passable. Like the 2015/2016 Warriors had a nice supporting cast but hardly all time great despite historic success.

Surely by the same metrics were are judging Curry by than Giannis, Harden, Durant, Doncic etc are all scrubs and the only true stars left are Lebron and Curry and Kawhi (kind of)?

[Rodwilliams]

Have you ever made a factual post? Warriors fans are "the only fans on here" who call out posters for going overboard on their negativity towards a specific player?

LOL.

Yeah, I've never seen haters of LeBron, Kobe, Kyrie, etc. called out by their fans on the RealGM General Board.

You've posted a lot of ridiculous things on here Rod, but that takes the cake. You've out-done yourself this time.

Bruh I fixed you in our last debate but we won’t get into that. Let me explain further on how I mean Warriors fans take things more personal.

Agree that other fans on here call out people too but their responses will be the typical “you’re delusional” or “your stupid” type of comment. Warriors fan take things to another level. They say things like “y’all should start a Warriors hate group”. He listed the names and everything. That’s why I could understand what Marcusss mean by keeping track of names. I never seen a Lebron fan or fan of other player team say something like that before on here. I never seen anyone say “start a Lebron hate group”. Other Warriors fans on here egged on the hate group comment too.

Another example is when a Warriors fan on here said that everyone who is Anti Warriors or Anti Curry are all burner accounts of each other. One of the dumbest comments I ever read on here but Warriors egged that comment on too. Never heard a Lebron fan call anti Lebron people burner accounts of each other on here. Same with other players and teams.

Your buddy Warriors Analyst barely even talks about basketball on here anymore. He just comes on threads just to list the names of people who don’t like Curry.

It just seems like yall be taking things too personal sometimes. Your whole “what have you said factual comment” shows that. Y’all just start saying outrageous things whenever it’s someone that’s anti Curry.

"Bruh," you got turned inside-out in our last debate. It basically consisted of this: you repeating the same, tired things over and over, me calling you out, you lashing out and calling me a liar, me proving you wrong with links, and then you lashing out and calling me a liar again.

I never took anything "personal." I simply pointed out facts that, unfortunately for you, flew in the face of your silly opinions. You responded by starting new threads repeating the same things in different ways. Enough is enough for me.

This will be the last time I respond to you. I am now going to do what Kevin Durant should have done years ago: I'm going to stop arguing basketball with teenagers online (yes, your behavior makes it quite obvious).

Have a nice day.

Our last argument was when you asked me who won a championship with a player worse than Klay Thompson and I destroyed that entire argument. You then went on to call me names and insult me. You then ran with this imaginary fairytale about threads I create and I shut that entire argument down too. You just made up stuff as the argument went along and I dismissed you because you couldn’t prove anything that you were saying. Now you’re trying to pull the same and dismiss me. Nice try I’m done with you homie.

[Rodwilliams]

When we say Curry has to get his team to the playoffs we talking about 8th seed, not 9th or 10th play in tournament.

at this point it's pretty clear Steph won't be able to do anything to change the mind of the very few in this crew, after single handedly taking a 14 win team to the POs in the tougher conference while posting peak MVP level metrics and stats...it doesn't really matter at this point, it's just comical watching people grasp at whatever anti Steph straws they have left, there isn't much they can hold onto anymore.

I gave him credit for the 11 game run but they are still in 9th place. All I’m saying is get to the 8th spot which shouldn’t be hard.

[xdrta+]

When we say Curry has to get his team to the playoffs we talking about 8th seed, not 9th or 10th play in tournament.

at this point it's pretty clear Steph won't be able to do anything to change the mind of the very few in this crew, after single handedly taking a 14 win team to the POs in the tougher conference while posting peak MVP level metrics and stats...it doesn't really matter at this point, it's just comical watching people grasp at whatever anti Steph straws they have left, there isn't much they can hold onto anymore.

I gave him credit for the 11 game run but they are still in 9th place. All I’m saying is get to the 8th spot which shouldn’t be hard.

Right, if they get to 8th seed you'll rescind the innumerable comments you've made over the last 110 pages. You are hilarious.

[art_tatum]

How is this still even being discussed?

*CTRL+F: LeBron*

*28 matches found on this page*

Nevermind, makes sense

To be fair there's some notorious houston fans/harden fans too. Since steph and warriors killed their chances for half a decade.

[clyde21]

at this point it's pretty clear Steph won't be able to do anything to change the mind of the very few in this crew, after single handedly taking a 14 win team to the POs in the tougher conference while posting peak MVP level metrics and stats...it doesn't really matter at this point, it's just comical watching people grasp at whatever anti Steph straws they have left, there isn't much they can hold onto anymore.

I gave him credit for the 11 game run but they are still in 9th place. All I’m saying is get to the 8th spot which shouldn’t be hard.

Right, if they get to 8th seed you'll rescind the innumerable comments you've made over the last 110 pages. You are hilarious.

it's a comedy sesh in this thread

[clyde21]

When we say Curry has to get his team to the playoffs we talking about 8th seed, not 9th or 10th play in tournament.

at this point it's pretty clear Steph won't be able to do anything to change the mind of the very few in this crew, after single handedly taking a 14 win team to the POs in the tougher conference while posting peak MVP level metrics and stats...it doesn't really matter at this point, it's just comical watching people grasp at whatever anti Steph straws they have left, there isn't much they can hold onto anymore.

I gave him credit for the 11 game run but they are still in 9th place. All I’m saying is get to the 8th spot which shouldn’t be hard.

so if he gets 8th he's the goat?

[Texas Chuck]

how come nobody's talking about how Steph is going to be the NBA's first ever Marvel Champion?

[Rodwilliams]

at this point it's pretty clear Steph won't be able to do anything to change the mind of the very few in this crew, after single handedly taking a 14 win team to the POs in the tougher conference while posting peak MVP level metrics and stats...it doesn't really matter at this point, it's just comical watching people grasp at whatever anti Steph straws they have left, there isn't much they can hold onto anymore.

I gave him credit for the 11 game run but they are still in 9th place. All I’m saying is get to the 8th spot which shouldn’t be hard.

so if he gets 8th he's the goat?

Curry is facing criticism this year that he hasn’t faced before. That’s why you get “is he exposed threads”. There are a few narratives out there. I’ll admit that he destroyed the narrative that he can’t be efficient without Klay. The other narrative that you see a lot of people talking about this year is whether he can carry a team without an all time roster or 4 all stars. If he at least gets them to the 8th seed then I think he ends that narrative as well.

[clyde21]

I gave him credit for the 11 game run but they are still in 9th place. All I’m saying is get to the 8th spot which shouldn’t be hard.

so if he gets 8th he's the goat?

Curry is facing criticism this year that he hasn’t faced before. That’s why you get “is he exposed threads”. There are a few narratives out there. I’ll admit that he destroyed the narrative that he can’t be efficient without Klay. The other narrative that you see a lot of people talking about this year is whether he can carry a team without an all time roster or 4 all stars. If he at least gets them to the 8th seed then I think he ends that narrative as well.

you know the NBA existed before 2016, right?

and I asked you a question, Curry makes the 8th seed, what then? what are you conceding?

[michaelm]

Make the playoffs. I mean, tonight they had a very winnable game against a bad Washington team and he went 7-25 from the field and 2-14 from 3. Everyone has bad games of course, but you can't afford very many of those when you're fighting for your playoff lives. Their schedule is pretty easy from here on out. They play the Pelicans 3 times, the Thunder twice, as well as the Kings, Rockets, and Timberwolves. They also have a game against the Grizzlies. With 13 games left, they only have three hard games left - Denver, Utah, and Phoenix. The other 10 are all very winnable. Plenty of chances to move up the standings and make the play-in round easier for themselves.

I honestly can't tell if your trolling. You realize these exact same arguments could be made about Lebron in 2019? Team was slightly above 500 with him on the court, missed the playoffs, activated playoff mode, and lost games to weak teams like ATL, NYK, and the Pelicans down the stretch

Except they can’t. I can tell this will be a waste of my time typing this out, but I will anyway. LeBron played 67% of his team’s games and was still not healthy when he came back. He wasn’t close to 100% and anyone who watched could tell. Curry has been healthy the vast majority of the year. He’s played 86% of his games. The 8th seed in 2019 was 48-34. That’d be equivalent to 33-24 through 57 games. The 8th seed this year is 29-28. Curry’s getting praised for having his team under .500 and in the 10th seed. A fully healthy Curry playing as well as he ever has should be able to get his team past a Memphis team led by a 21 year old and into the playoffs.

And yet it is constantly argued on here that Curry must be assumed to have been completely healthy in the 2016 finals.

[Optms]

Went toe to toe against RealGM's MVP (Jokic) and fleeced the entire Nuggets late in the 4th.

32//8/3 on 11-18 shooting

Nay sayers exposed, yet again

[MindState]

Is Curry allowed to get fouled nonstop? I feel like that Compazzo dude would have fouled out in 5 minutes if he was guarding Irving or Harden.

[JH5]

Lol, how in the world was LeBron “pretty much playing with the current Pels minus Zion” in 2019? Three players on this Pelicans team were on that Lakers team. Lonzo Ball played 47 games in 2019. Brandon Ingram played 52 games. LeBron, Alonzo, and Ingram played 23 games together that season and went 15-8. But sure, he “pretty much was playing with the current Pels minus Zion.”

Three starters on the Pels was playing with LeBron. That’s pretty much the Pels.

Who’s the third starter? Josh Hart has started four games for them this year. The other two starters, Lonzo Ball and Brandon Ingram, played 23 games with LeBron and went 15-8.

Lakers starter Ingram that year shot 33% from 3, 67% FT shooter (vs 38.x% and 89%). WS have climbed from 2 to 5.

That Lonzo 32% 3PTer to 37% now, FT from 41% to 79%.

Both those guys weren’t NBA starter material back then.

[floppymoose]

Whenever Steph gets pissed it's over. Whether it's Delladova or Beverly or Perkins or Compazzo, the moment some guy on the other teams takes it too far they've just lost the game. Angry Steph is next level.

[dhsilv2]

You are arguing for one guy on the list and not even giving good reasoning. Wiseman is a Rookie and compared to other rookies he has pretty good numbers at worst he's in the Top 10 amongst Rookies and a shoe in to make the all rookie team. He still has tons of potential and far from a G-Leaguer. Do you know what a G-Leaguer is? Think of guys like Antonius Cleveland, Andre Ingram, Jarrell Eddie, etc

Being a rookie doesn't excuse being terrible at basketball and right now he is terrible by NBA standards. He's got the 12th worst VORP in the league. Only Maledon among qualifying players had a worse BPM this year than Wiseman. 538's raptor, he has the worst score in the history of the metric. Among all centers, who played any time at all, he has the 80th lowest RPM on the season. The guy is not good enough to be playing basketball in the nba and every stat shows that.

Listing him as if he hasn't been horrible would be like a top 50 list of guards in nba history and leaving Jordan off it.

He is far from a G-leaguer. G-leaguer is a guy who goes undrafted and plays in the G-league and tries to get called up to the NBA.

High draft picks with potential are not G-leaguers until they prove their potential went to waste and are no longer valued for a nba roster spot.

When people are discussing players in terms of G league, they're referencing the quality of a replacement level player that a team can pull up from the g-league. They are also ONLY speaking about current playing value, not potential.

[WarriorGM]

Curry is facing criticism this year that he hasn’t faced before. That’s why you get “is he exposed threads”. There are a few narratives out there. I’ll admit that he destroyed the narrative that he can’t be efficient without Klay. The other narrative that you see a lot of people talking about this year is whether he can carry a team without an all time roster or 4 all stars. If he at least gets them to the 8th seed then I think he ends that narrative as well.

More nonsense being pulled out of thin air. What criticism is he facing this year that he hasn't faced before? Why would he be facing it this year and not another? The only reason he'd be facing it this year and not previously is that detractors saw an opportunity to get their digs in with the weak team he is playing with and thought they could kick his reputation while he is down and safely get away with it. Tip: it is always dangerous to doubt an all-time great player. You're going to end up looking silly more often than not.

[VanWest82]

Warriors are 7th in DRTG but only 22nd in ORTG. They'd probably be 1st in DRTG if they didn't have to hide Steph all game.

The Warriors with the best NRTGs are Bazemore, Looney, JTA, and Draymond, basically their best defenders plus Wiggins.

Warriors are 1st in assists because Draymond is a stud passer getting everyone involved. He had 19 assists tonight!

Steph just can't get it done without so much help to prop him up and make him look good.

Spoiler:

am I doing it right?