Scoot McGroot wrote:Sabonis makes almost triple what Boucher does, so the filler would be from Toronto, not us.
yes, and the player with the right sized deal is Hood who I don't think we need. maybe he goes to a third team.
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Scoot McGroot wrote:Sabonis makes almost triple what Boucher does, so the filler would be from Toronto, not us.
Wizop wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Sabonis makes almost triple what Boucher does, so the filler would be from Toronto, not us.
yes, and the player with the right sized deal is Hood who I don't think we need. maybe he goes to a third team.
Tom White wrote:Topofthekey wrote:And Lowry doesn't fit our timeline
I swear I'm not picking on you when I say this (cause many others have said the same thing) but -
We have a timeline?
A timeline to where or what?
This team would be much better served to focus on talent before focusing on age group. Yes, ideally, you try to get a convergence of both. That doesn't seem to be working out very well right now though. Doesn't focusing on an age group also lend itself to having more second (or even third) contracts come due at the same time?
Or maybe I'm just nuts?
Tom White wrote:Topofthekey wrote:And Lowry doesn't fit our timeline
I swear I'm not picking on you when I say this (cause many others have said the same thing) but -
We have a timeline?
A timeline to where or what?
This team would be much better served to focus on talent before focusing on age group. Yes, ideally, you try to get a convergence of both. That doesn't seem to be working out very well right now though. Doesn't focusing on an age group also lend itself to having more second (or even third) contracts come due at the same time?
Or maybe I'm just nuts?
Tom White wrote:Guys, my response about the timeline was really not directed at Lowry as much as it was about the idea of a timeline in general. I just think over the years people have put too much emphasis on the idea. Having a few "seasoned" veterans wouldn't hurt this team a bit.
Wizop wrote:UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Raptor fan, what would you guys want from us to take Turner off your hands?
if we break up Turner/Sabonis, we're more likely to move Sabonis as we need GTurner's defense. Sabonis for Boucher and a pick swap? might need filler. Lamb or Aaron Holiday could be added from our side.
8305 wrote:Wizop wrote:UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Raptor fan, what would you guys want from us to take Turner off your hands?
if we break up Turner/Sabonis, we're more likely to move Sabonis as we need GTurner's defense. Sabonis for Boucher and a pick swap? might need filler. Lamb or Aaron Holiday could be added from our side.
Turner for Boucher and Toronto’s 2021 1st makes sense to me. This assumes the Raps don’t score in the lottery andwe might have to absorb some dead salary to make this happen. Not the end of the world for me. There are some interesting guys between 6 and 15 and who knows how far up a team could move packaging a couple late lottery picks.
Topofthekey wrote:I'm not very keen on Boucher personally
Topofthekey wrote:I'm warming up to the idea of acquiring Russell Westbrook
Pacercoltboiler wrote:I am curious about Cameron Payne.
Tom White wrote:Pacercoltboiler wrote:I am curious about Cameron Payne.
I would have the same question as I had in the Westbrook post. Why would the Suns let go of him? Good talent on a cheap rookie contract. Why would they let him go, and who on our roster could they possibly want?
Scoot McGroot wrote:Tom White wrote:Pacercoltboiler wrote:I am curious about Cameron Payne.
I would have the same question as I had in the Westbrook post. Why would the Suns let go of him? Good talent on a cheap rookie contract. Why would they let him go, and who on our roster could they possibly want?
Cam Payne will be an unrestricted free agent with 6 years of NBA service, and Phoenix will have Early bird rights. However, they will have no contractual control over him. If Indy were to offer him their full MLE, that’s the most we could offer, though Phoenix would be able to pay him a little more with their Early Bird rights they have on him.
As for Westbrook, I could live with acquiring him, for sure. The only problem is that to match salaries in a trade and not take on luxury tax, we’d have to send out 2 of our major contracts in Brogdon, Levert, Turner, and Sabonis, and still also have to add in one of Lamb or Warren. I like Westbrook, but I don’t think I’d do Levert/Turner/Lamb for him, and even doing that leaves us closer to the luxury tax, and now having around $10m total to fill 4 remaining roster spots, meaning it’s highly unlikely we could keep either of TJ or Doug. In all likelihood, we’d have to send out 3 of our big deal, just to make things work. Brogdon/Levert/Sabonis for Westbrook makes less sense.
Topofthekey wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Tom White wrote:
I would have the same question as I had in the Westbrook post. Why would the Suns let go of him? Good talent on a cheap rookie contract. Why would they let him go, and who on our roster could they possibly want?
Cam Payne will be an unrestricted free agent with 6 years of NBA service, and Phoenix will have Early bird rights. However, they will have no contractual control over him. If Indy were to offer him their full MLE, that’s the most we could offer, though Phoenix would be able to pay him a little more with their Early Bird rights they have on him.
As for Westbrook, I could live with acquiring him, for sure. The only problem is that to match salaries in a trade and not take on luxury tax, we’d have to send out 2 of our major contracts in Brogdon, Levert, Turner, and Sabonis, and still also have to add in one of Lamb or Warren. I like Westbrook, but I don’t think I’d do Levert/Turner/Lamb for him, and even doing that leaves us closer to the luxury tax, and now having around $10m total to fill 4 remaining roster spots, meaning it’s highly unlikely we could keep either of TJ or Doug. In all likelihood, we’d have to send out 3 of our big deal, just to make things work. Brogdon/Levert/Sabonis for Westbrook makes less sense.
What if we asked for Hachimura as well?
Domas + Brogdon + LeVert/Lamb for Westbrook + Hachimura
Topofthekey wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Tom White wrote:
I would have the same question as I had in the Westbrook post. Why would the Suns let go of him? Good talent on a cheap rookie contract. Why would they let him go, and who on our roster could they possibly want?
Cam Payne will be an unrestricted free agent with 6 years of NBA service, and Phoenix will have Early bird rights. However, they will have no contractual control over him. If Indy were to offer him their full MLE, that’s the most we could offer, though Phoenix would be able to pay him a little more with their Early Bird rights they have on him.
As for Westbrook, I could live with acquiring him, for sure. The only problem is that to match salaries in a trade and not take on luxury tax, we’d have to send out 2 of our major contracts in Brogdon, Levert, Turner, and Sabonis, and still also have to add in one of Lamb or Warren. I like Westbrook, but I don’t think I’d do Levert/Turner/Lamb for him, and even doing that leaves us closer to the luxury tax, and now having around $10m total to fill 4 remaining roster spots, meaning it’s highly unlikely we could keep either of TJ or Doug. In all likelihood, we’d have to send out 3 of our big deal, just to make things work. Brogdon/Levert/Sabonis for Westbrook makes less sense.
What if we asked for Hachimura as well?
Domas + Brogdon + LeVert/Lamb for Westbrook + Hachimura