Bar Fight wrote:Saint Lazarus wrote:Bar Fight wrote:And I was responding strictly to your dismissal of Kyrie's claims because he's a "flat earther". Not your back and forth with Cave, truth or whoever else you have an axe to grind with. If you're going to dismiss Kyrie's supposed experiences due to a perceived lack of credibility then what do you have to say about Smart saying he's experienced the very same things?
So yeah...your LA deflection still does not have a damn thing to do with anything I said. Like...at all. You can play the "every city is racist!" card all you want, and that's true to a degree. But to act like Boston does not have a unique history of racism, including fairly recent history is absurd. There's a reason the city has the reputation it does, and it's not because everyone is out to get us.
Boston is racist as ****! Kyrie was right to leave because he experienced racism in Boston at the hands of belligerent Celtics fans.
Are you happy now? Honestly I don't give a **** about this racism conversation at all but if it helps you sleep better at night knowing I acknowledged that Boston is a racist shithole then I'll do it for you, fellow Celtics fan.
**** the CeltiKKKs!
The Celtics organization doesn't have **** to do with the racism in the city of Boston. In fact, the Celtics have been a fairly progressive organization throughout history.

Y̶o̶u̶ ̶d̶o̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶e̶ It is not required to fall on your sword defending the city of Boston's racist history to be a Boston Celtics fan.
Give me a break. Boston had racial issues In The 1960s with busing.
NYC was sued under Bloomberg fir stop abd frisk and had Eric garner killed for a loosie.
And Boston got a problem?
Boston no more or less racist than any other city. Go down into the depth south and see racism.
It isn’t happening in Boston. Lord. Give me a break. City has changed is much from the 1960s it isn’t even close.
Boston is as a progressive a city as there is in the United States. Always has been.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk