We cant get Lillard, Kawhi, and Randle.
Lillard 44M
Kawhi 39M
Randle 20M
Noah Dead Cap 6,5M
Roster Spots: 9M
Total: 118,5M
Salary Cap should be around 112M/115M
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
robillionaire wrote:Hypothetically if we did go after Lillard I would probably try to trade Randle to Portland in that deal. I would prefer to keep Randle obviously, but I don't see how we can afford both of them and still improve the team afterwards, adding an all-star in Randle who is also on a team friendly expiring contract could help match salary and sweeten the pot and maybe we don't have to send quite as many picks to them in the deal.
I would prefer not to trade for Lillard. We would have no cap space or no assets for 4-5 years, it would be a carmelo anthony level gamble on a player who just lost in the 1st round again to a Murray-less nuggets team and probably doesn't make you a championship contender and who will be making almost 50 million hitting his mid-30s. Better hope he ages like wine like cp3 did instead of getting injured and becoming an albatross like john wall.
You could say his supporting cast sucks but do you really think we will do any better than cj mccollum and norman powell and the role players they had with no picks and cap space, probably not, and that's a 1 and done playoff team
Chanel Bomber wrote:Spoiler:
god shammgod wrote:robillionaire wrote:Hypothetically if we did go after Lillard I would probably try to trade Randle to Portland in that deal. I would prefer to keep Randle obviously, but I don't see how we can afford both of them and still improve the team afterwards, adding an all-star in Randle who is also on a team friendly expiring contract could help match salary and sweeten the pot and maybe we don't have to send quite as many picks to them in the deal.
I would prefer not to trade for Lillard. We would have no cap space or no assets for 4-5 years, it would be a carmelo anthony level gamble on a player who just lost in the 1st round again to a Murray-less nuggets team and probably doesn't make you a championship contender and who will be making almost 50 million hitting his mid-30s. Better hope he ages like wine like cp3 did instead of getting injured and becoming an albatross like john wall.
You could say his supporting cast sucks but do you really think we will do any better than cj mccollum and norman powell and the role players they had with no picks and cap space, probably not, and that's a 1 and done playoff team
you'd probably have to. you're not building a package around rj. nobody besides knick fans here think he's a future star. he's just the new gallinari where everybody thinks he's better than he actually is.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:robillionaire wrote:Hypothetically if we did go after Lillard I would probably try to trade Randle to Portland in that deal. I would prefer to keep Randle obviously, but I don't see how we can afford both of them and still improve the team afterwards, adding an all-star in Randle who is also on a team friendly expiring contract could help match salary and sweeten the pot and maybe we don't have to send quite as many picks to them in the deal.
I would prefer not to trade for Lillard. We would have no cap space or no assets for 4-5 years, it would be a carmelo anthony level gamble on a player who just lost in the 1st round again to a Murray-less nuggets team and probably doesn't make you a championship contender and who will be making almost 50 million hitting his mid-30s. Better hope he ages like wine like cp3 did instead of getting injured and becoming an albatross like john wall.
You could say his supporting cast sucks but do you really think we will do any better than cj mccollum and norman powell and the role players they had with no picks and cap space, probably not, and that's a 1 and done playoff team
you'd probably have to. you're not building a package around rj. nobody besides knick fans here think he's a future star. he's just the new gallinari where everybody thinks he's better than he actually is.
The quest remains if POR is really trading lillard you can't retool losing your best player. That never works. You might as well just get every draft pick known to man and only players on rookie deals. And then tank.
What is Randle going to do for them? especially just with one year remaining on his contract?
god shammgod wrote:[instagram][/instagram]mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:
you'd probably have to. you're not building a package around rj. nobody besides knick fans here think he's a future star. he's just the new gallinari where everybody thinks he's better than he actually is.
The quest remains if POR is really trading lillard you can't retool losing your best player. That never works. You might as well just get every draft pick known to man and only players on rookie deals. And then tank.
What is Randle going to do for them? especially just with one year remaining on his contract?
honestly i don't think there's a trade to be made. but some teams don't want to tear it down. they'd rather stay relevant and try to be an 8th seed because they're a small market and don't want to lose the money you do during a rebuild.
god shammgod wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Spoiler:
what a terrible person you are. i'm ashamed. really.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:[instagram][/instagram]mpharris36 wrote:
The quest remains if POR is really trading lillard you can't retool losing your best player. That never works. You might as well just get every draft pick known to man and only players on rookie deals. And then tank.
What is Randle going to do for them? especially just with one year remaining on his contract?
honestly i don't think there's a trade to be made. but some teams don't want to tear it down. they'd rather stay relevant and try to be an 8th seed because they're a small market and don't want to lose the money you do during a rebuild.
If Lillar asks out POR will trade him (players always get what they want and they don't want a messy breakup since he has committed way too much time there as it is). I don't think they are trading him to a Western Conf team because well no team wants to do that. And its not like the lakers or clippers can muster up the draft capital to trade for him.
I mean what team can offer POR massive financial savings + a ton of draft capital + some young players. Only a handful of teams can do it.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:[instagram][/instagram]mpharris36 wrote:
The quest remains if POR is really trading lillard you can't retool losing your best player. That never works. You might as well just get every draft pick known to man and only players on rookie deals. And then tank.
What is Randle going to do for them? especially just with one year remaining on his contract?
honestly i don't think there's a trade to be made. but some teams don't want to tear it down. they'd rather stay relevant and try to be an 8th seed because they're a small market and don't want to lose the money you do during a rebuild.
If Lillar asks out POR will trade him (players always get what they want and they don't want a messy breakup since he has committed way too much time there as it is). I don't think they are trading him to a Western Conf team because well no team wants to do that. And its not like the lakers or clippers can muster up the draft capital to trade for him.
I mean what team can offer POR massive financial savings + a ton of draft capital + some young players. Only a handful of teams can do it.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:robillionaire wrote:Hypothetically if we did go after Lillard I would probably try to trade Randle to Portland in that deal. I would prefer to keep Randle obviously, but I don't see how we can afford both of them and still improve the team afterwards, adding an all-star in Randle who is also on a team friendly expiring contract could help match salary and sweeten the pot and maybe we don't have to send quite as many picks to them in the deal.
I would prefer not to trade for Lillard. We would have no cap space or no assets for 4-5 years, it would be a carmelo anthony level gamble on a player who just lost in the 1st round again to a Murray-less nuggets team and probably doesn't make you a championship contender and who will be making almost 50 million hitting his mid-30s. Better hope he ages like wine like cp3 did instead of getting injured and becoming an albatross like john wall.
You could say his supporting cast sucks but do you really think we will do any better than cj mccollum and norman powell and the role players they had with no picks and cap space, probably not, and that's a 1 and done playoff team
you'd probably have to. you're not building a package around rj. nobody besides knick fans here think he's a future star. he's just the new gallinari where everybody thinks he's better than he actually is.
The quest remains if POR is really trading lillard you can't retool losing your best player. That never works. You might as well just get every draft pick known to man and only players on rookie deals. And then tank.
What is Randle going to do for them? especially just with one year remaining on his contract?
Richard4444 wrote:
We cant get Lillard, Kawhi, and Randle.
Lillard 44M
Kawhi 39M
Randle 20M
Noah Dead Cap 6,5M
Roster Spots: 9M
Total: 118,5M
Salary Cap should be around 112M/115M
Spree2Houston wrote:Lakers were the only threat in the West. Nets are winning the title now.
Spree2Houston wrote:Lakers were the only threat in the West. Nets are winning the title now.
god shammgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:[instagram][/instagram]
honestly i don't think there's a trade to be made. but some teams don't want to tear it down. they'd rather stay relevant and try to be an 8th seed because they're a small market and don't want to lose the money you do during a rebuild.
If Lillar asks out POR will trade him (players always get what they want and they don't want a messy breakup since he has committed way too much time there as it is). I don't think they are trading him to a Western Conf team because well no team wants to do that. And its not like the lakers or clippers can muster up the draft capital to trade for him.
I mean what team can offer POR massive financial savings + a ton of draft capital + some young players. Only a handful of teams can do it.
the celtics could offer jaylen brown and picks. philly could offer simmons and picks. we don't have anything great to offer. our picks aren't even in the lottery.
Chanel Bomber wrote:Oscirus wrote:HerSports85 wrote:
i could see the celtics, but the lakers? wtf? I dont even think the lakers could get him if he demanded it
Wouldn't be shocked if Bron was done with AD. Dude doesn't have it.
Dame for AD?
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
If Lillar asks out POR will trade him (players always get what they want and they don't want a messy breakup since he has committed way too much time there as it is). I don't think they are trading him to a Western Conf team because well no team wants to do that. And its not like the lakers or clippers can muster up the draft capital to trade for him.
I mean what team can offer POR massive financial savings + a ton of draft capital + some young players. Only a handful of teams can do it.
the celtics could offer jaylen brown and picks. philly could offer simmons and picks. we don't have anything great to offer. our picks aren't even in the lottery.
Are you sure Jaylen Brown is a better trade asset than RJ. I know you don't like RJ but he's still on his rookie deal and 4 years younger. When Brown was 20 he wasn't putting up RJ numbers.
What is POR going to do with Ben Simmons. They get worse from lillard to Simmons but would meander in mediocracy. If you trade Lillard you tank.
ENYK wrote:Richard4444 wrote:HerSports85 wrote:
Lillard + Kawhi
We cant get Lillard, Kawhi, and Randle.
Lillard 44M
Kawhi 39M
Randle 20M
Noah Dead Cap 6,5M
Roster Spots: 9M
Total: 118,5M
Salary Cap should be around 112M/115M
I think they could maneuver it if they really wanted to get it done... It just doesn't make a lot of sense for anyone... I don't think Lillard, Kawhi, and Randle surrounded by a bunch of vet min players is beating a healthy Brooklyn. And there are teams that are a lot closer to contention with better assets available (Philly).
the Knicks have to do it if there is a shot to do it of course, but I'd rather see them build for the next generation of superstars (Luka, Zion, Tatum). At best, at their ages, a Kawhi/Dame tandem is eking out a single championship.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
If Lillar asks out POR will trade him (players always get what they want and they don't want a messy breakup since he has committed way too much time there as it is). I don't think they are trading him to a Western Conf team because well no team wants to do that. And its not like the lakers or clippers can muster up the draft capital to trade for him.
I mean what team can offer POR massive financial savings + a ton of draft capital + some young players. Only a handful of teams can do it.
the celtics could offer jaylen brown and picks. philly could offer simmons and picks. we don't have anything great to offer. our picks aren't even in the lottery.
Are you sure Jaylen Brown is a better trade asset than RJ. I know you don't like RJ but he's still on his rookie deal and 4 years younger. When Brown was 20 he wasn't putting up RJ numbers.
What is POR going to do with Ben Simmons. They get worse from lillard to Simmons but would meander in mediocracy. If you trade Lillard you tank.