Image ImageImage Image

Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson

User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 41,829
And1: 23,820
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#181 » by kulaz3000 » Fri Jun 4, 2021 1:05 am

Leslie Forman wrote:
kulaz3000 wrote:
Leslie Forman wrote:If anybody's looking for one of those "buy low" vet opportunities, I mean…isn't that just screaming Kemba Walker then?


No to Kemba Walker for me personally.

I have Chris Paul, and Lowry way ahead of him.

All three have issues with injuries though.

I mean…wouldn't most here have said Chris Paul was washed up two years ago, and Mike Conley a year ago?

That's why it's buying low. Vucevic? That was buying high. Real high. Way too high.


Yeah, but as a point guard even buying low, Kemba isn't exactly what we are looking for. He is more of a small shooting guard. Whereas, Chris Paul and Lowry are more conventional point guards, with a whole lot more playoff and leadership experience.
Why so serious?
GoBlue72391
General Manager
Posts: 9,266
And1: 5,695
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#182 » by GoBlue72391 » Fri Jun 4, 2021 1:19 am

Already having Zach and Coby then adding Kemba on a huge contract to the mix is too redundant and just more of what we already have.

Sent from my SM-S115DL using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Leslie Forman
RealGM
Posts: 10,119
And1: 6,300
Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Location: 1700 Center Dr, Ames, IA 50011

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#183 » by Leslie Forman » Fri Jun 4, 2021 2:41 am

kulaz3000 wrote:Yeah, but as a point guard even buying low, Kemba isn't exactly what we are looking for. He is more of a small shooting guard. Whereas, Chris Paul and Lowry are more conventional point guards, with a whole lot more playoff and leadership experience.

"Conventional" point guards really aren't necessary at all. The best Chicago Bulls teams never had one. The majority of title winning teams didn't have one. And it was only a year ago that Boston with him made the ECF.

Note that I'm not saying he should be their first choice. But Paul and Lowry are highly unlikely to come here, and his contract is the same length as Vucevic's.
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,183
And1: 6,543
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#184 » by Andi Obst » Fri Jun 4, 2021 10:55 am

At least Dennis Schröder should be out of the discussion now.
...formerly known as Little Nathan.

jc23 wrote:the fate of humanity rides on Chicago winning this game.
jmajew
Rookie
Posts: 1,187
And1: 340
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
         

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#185 » by jmajew » Fri Jun 4, 2021 12:31 pm

I want DeMar DeRozan on a 3 year deal. You can always run the offense through him. You don't need a traditional PG.
User avatar
BullChit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,669
And1: 3,707
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#186 » by BullChit » Fri Jun 4, 2021 4:10 pm

What were Kembas injuries this year? Are the likely to reoccur or could an off season and some solid rehab and training get him back to close to his all star levels
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
boozapalooza
Rookie
Posts: 1,188
And1: 654
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#187 » by boozapalooza » Fri Jun 4, 2021 4:21 pm

I mean....I’ll say it. Any chance Damian Lillard asks out of Portland? Cryptic social media post from him last night after the loss. Could make sense for him to try to move on. Him and Zach would be a hell of a backcourt.

What would it cost? A package of anyone except Zach and Vooch?
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,183
And1: 6,543
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#188 » by Andi Obst » Fri Jun 4, 2021 4:22 pm

BullChit wrote:What were Kembas injuries this year? Are the likely to reoccur or could an off season and some solid rehab and training get him back to close to his all star levels


He’s dealing with knee issues for quite some time now. Definitely very concerning for a guy who relies a lot on his speed.
...formerly known as Little Nathan.

jc23 wrote:the fate of humanity rides on Chicago winning this game.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,065
And1: 35,308
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#189 » by coldfish » Fri Jun 4, 2021 5:23 pm

jmajew wrote:I want DeMar DeRozan on a 3 year deal. You can always run the offense through him. You don't need a traditional PG.


I'm a broken record but an old school PG is not a need for the Bulls or any other team. If Chicago can get Lillard, that's great but what Chicago needs is talent.

Derozan makes a lot of sense, IMO.
Coby
Lavine
Derozan
Pat or Theis
Vucevic
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,183
And1: 6,543
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#190 » by Andi Obst » Fri Jun 4, 2021 6:01 pm

coldfish wrote:
jmajew wrote:I want DeMar DeRozan on a 3 year deal. You can always run the offense through him. You don't need a traditional PG.


I'm a broken record but an old school PG is not a need for the Bulls or any other team. If Chicago can get Lillard, that's great but what Chicago needs is talent.

Derozan makes a lot of sense, IMO.
Coby
Lavine
Derozan
Pat or Theis
Vucevic


Issue is that Pat would have to become an absolute monster on defense to make that viable. We can’t really have another negative defender in DeRozan on this squad. Certainly not with Coby starting.
...formerly known as Little Nathan.

jc23 wrote:the fate of humanity rides on Chicago winning this game.
jmajew
Rookie
Posts: 1,187
And1: 340
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
         

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#191 » by jmajew » Fri Jun 4, 2021 8:20 pm

Little Nathan wrote:
coldfish wrote:
jmajew wrote:I want DeMar DeRozan on a 3 year deal. You can always run the offense through him. You don't need a traditional PG.


I'm a broken record but an old school PG is not a need for the Bulls or any other team. If Chicago can get Lillard, that's great but what Chicago needs is talent.

Derozan makes a lot of sense, IMO.
Coby
Lavine
Derozan
Pat or Theis
Vucevic


Issue is that Pat would have to become an absolute monster on defense to make that viable. We can’t really have another negative defender in DeRozan on this squad. Certainly not with Coby starting.


You build out the team then with good defensive players. You have on your roster Lavine, DeRozan, Vucevic, & White and you should be able to score points. I know your not going to win a title with that group. It will be very dependent on Williams become the next Paul George or Kawhi.
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,183
And1: 6,543
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany
 

Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#192 » by Andi Obst » Fri Jun 4, 2021 9:13 pm

jmajew wrote:You build out the team then with good defensive players.


When 4 out of 5 starters, the guys you rely on and probably want on the court in the deciding moments of a game, are negatives on defense, the defensive players you got won’t help you much.
...formerly known as Little Nathan.

jc23 wrote:the fate of humanity rides on Chicago winning this game.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 10,821
And1: 3,360
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#193 » by pipfan » Fri Jun 4, 2021 9:30 pm

You go big
Derozen
Lavine
Williams
Theis
Vuc
d boy gentleman
Analyst
Posts: 3,460
And1: 1,311
Joined: Jun 02, 2009
     

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#194 » by d boy gentleman » Fri Jun 4, 2021 10:30 pm

coldfish wrote:
jmajew wrote:I want DeMar DeRozan on a 3 year deal. You can always run the offense through him. You don't need a traditional PG.


I'm a broken record but an old school PG is not a need for the Bulls or any other team. If Chicago can get Lillard, that's great but what Chicago needs is talent.

Derozan makes a lot of sense, IMO.
Coby
Lavine
Derozan
Pat or Theis
Vucevic


Who is willing to be a blood sacrifice in order for that to happen? :o
coldfish wrote:Zach should file a complaint. Some of those non calls were battery complaints.

Stratmaster wrote:Will Perdue says asinine things, and his pants are way too short.

sco wrote: New Orleans has to be one of the, if not THE hardest city to eat healthy. I think they fry the water.
User avatar
TheJordanRule
Veteran
Posts: 2,768
And1: 1,253
Joined: Jan 27, 2014

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#195 » by TheJordanRule » Fri Jun 4, 2021 10:52 pm

Little Nathan wrote:At least Dennis Schröder should be out of the discussion now.


Thank you! Dennis does not move the needle. Even when he's paired up with Lebron James, AD, and Drummond, they get bounced out of the first round. Schro's less relevant than 'Trez and about as relevant KCP or THT. Makes no sense to chase him at the lofty price tag he's projected to command. The volume scoring is cringe (TS % of 54.4 this year), his 3 ball is just bad (33.5 %), he's a turnover machine (over 2.7 TOs per game), and on defense he's a gambler who gets burned as often as he makes a positive impact. If I want an athletic PG with mediocre distribution skills, poor scoring ability, and a reputation for defense that rarely matches his actual performance, I'll sign Kris Dunn for a couple million and pass on Schro's 20+ million dollar per year deal.
User avatar
ChiefILL53
Starter
Posts: 2,264
And1: 826
Joined: Jun 15, 2013
       

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#196 » by ChiefILL53 » Sat Jun 5, 2021 7:02 am

I know his playmaking has greatly improved, but how is DeRozans defense? We also need defenders in the backcourt and at the rim

Sent from my HD1907 using RealGM mobile app
jc23 wrote:Goran + Lonzo + Zach = the Dragon Ball Z line up.
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,183
And1: 6,543
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#197 » by Andi Obst » Sat Jun 5, 2021 9:08 am

ChiefILL53 wrote:I know his playmaking has greatly improved, but how is DeRozans defense? We also need defenders in the backcourt and at the rim.


Spurs with DeRozan on the court: 117.26 DRTG

Spurs with DeRozan off the court: 107.46 DRTG

I know that needs more context and all, but that's a trend throughout almost his entire career. He's really hurting his teams on defense.
...formerly known as Little Nathan.

jc23 wrote:the fate of humanity rides on Chicago winning this game.
BigJimFinn
Junior
Posts: 377
And1: 347
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#198 » by BigJimFinn » Sat Jun 5, 2021 5:13 pm

Little Nathan wrote:
ChiefILL53 wrote:I know his playmaking has greatly improved, but how is DeRozans defense? We also need defenders in the backcourt and at the rim.


Spurs with DeRozan on the court: 117.26 DRTG

Spurs with DeRozan off the court: 107.46 DRTG

I know that needs more context and all, but that's a trend throughout almost his entire career. He's really hurting his teams on defense.


Yeah, compared to him LaVine looks like a very good defender. He was mostly used as a small-ball 4 defensively,
meaning in practice he guarded the least threatening guy from 2-4. He became a surprisingly efficient
playmaker from isolation plays, but his ballhandling in P&R is also limited by the lack of 3-point shot.
I don't think you could build a top 10 offense or top 20 defense around Zach, DDR and Vooch.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,136
And1: 1,661
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#199 » by waffle » Sat Jun 5, 2021 7:12 pm

I've said it repeatedly but I DO WANT a traditional PG, I think we would benefit from it.

- Good handles
- can bring the ball up consistently
- REALLY good defender around the arc. Slow down drives down the lane
- If his drawback is that he can't hit the 3? I'm fine with that.

We NEED someone with great handles who can push the ball. We NEED someone to slow down drives down the lane
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 24,938
And1: 7,005
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Free Agent/Trade For PG Discussion 

Post#200 » by Chi town » Sat Jun 5, 2021 8:11 pm

waffle wrote:I've said it repeatedly but I DO WANT a traditional PG, I think we would benefit from it.

- Good handles
- can bring the ball up consistently
- REALLY good defender around the arc. Slow down drives down the lane
- If his drawback is that he can't hit the 3? I'm fine with that.

We NEED someone with great handles who can push the ball. We NEED someone to slow down drives down the lane


That's why Lowry is such a good fit. Everything above and...

- He plays with an edge and an ultimate competitor... this team needs that badly
- Playoff experience and he's been a champ
- He plays really good D at PG and SG
- He will mentor Coby and can PG or SG with him
- He contols tempo and can change the momentum of a game without scoring

If we can get Lowry and bring everyone back but Lauri we will be a top 5 team in the East next season.

Return to Chicago Bulls