EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [3-2 Hawks]

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

Who will win game 6?

Hawks
45
58%
Sixers
32
42%
 
Total votes: 77

User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,400
And1: 57,023
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#161 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:20 am

How do the Sixers not ask Embiid to limit the moves he tries, no way you should be doing a Euro with a torn meniscus.
BeatDaCavs420
RealGM
Posts: 27,254
And1: 22,630
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
       

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#162 » by BeatDaCavs420 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

Doc you can't be serious to be bitching about that being a flagrant lmao stop it
damanick10
Starter
Posts: 2,435
And1: 3,500
Joined: May 28, 2017
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#163 » by damanick10 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

Difference between this and Jokic is that it was to stop a score. Jokic just ran up to the dude and swiped him lol
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,571
And1: 7,563
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#164 » by DowJones » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

Jokic really did get screwed.
AussieCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 13,019
And1: 24,234
Joined: Jan 02, 2014
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#165 » by AussieCeltic » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

DowJones wrote:This has to be an ejection--right? This is just like the Joker play.


Not even close. He hits his arm.

New school nba is a flagrant 1. Old school is a playoff foul.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,423
And1: 11,434
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#166 » by TheSuzerain » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?

At least he was conceivably playing defense and not whacking someone 90 feet from the hoop. Makes it different.
itrsteve
Head Coach
Posts: 6,433
And1: 11,036
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#167 » by itrsteve » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?


They may send him to jail
[quote=“dkb964”]156-1 Celtics are frauds when pressure is put on them. They would have been toast if Luka was not stupid enough to foul himself out. Enjoy this ONE finals win. There will never be another with the Js and the Celtics cant afford stacked team.[/quote]
jokeboy86
RealGM
Posts: 10,410
And1: 7,399
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#168 » by jokeboy86 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

I wonder are we going to get a Hawks/Bucks EC Finals because I’m cringing everytime Embiid hits the ground or jumps. Makes me worry everytime.
User avatar
NyKnicks1714
RealGM
Posts: 26,312
And1: 28,626
Joined: Nov 20, 2001
   

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#169 » by NyKnicks1714 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.
User avatar
grumpysaddle
RealGM
Posts: 21,039
And1: 14,333
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Location: San Diego
     

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#170 » by grumpysaddle » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:21 am

BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?

Difference is that he didn't seem to hit him in the face, and it wasn't as much of a wind-up. Hard foul, but Jokic's was super unnecessary.
Image
User avatar
Reeko
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 26,848
And1: 39,276
Joined: Jan 04, 2015
Location: East side, in a deluxe apartment in the sky.
   

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#171 » by Reeko » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:22 am

NyKnicks1714 wrote:I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.

The tennis player?
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
ckman
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,370
And1: 2,291
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#172 » by ckman » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:22 am

the NBA is so soft nowadays
zshawn10
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,416
And1: 5,641
Joined: Jul 27, 2015
       

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#173 » by zshawn10 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:23 am

Collins is filthy
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,555
And1: 36,518
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#174 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:23 am

John Collins is gonna get paid this summer.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
NyKnicks1714
RealGM
Posts: 26,312
And1: 28,626
Joined: Nov 20, 2001
   

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#175 » by NyKnicks1714 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:23 am

Reeko wrote:
NyKnicks1714 wrote:I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.

The tennis player?


Haha whoops. Close enough, not editing.
User avatar
Reeko
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 26,848
And1: 39,276
Joined: Jan 04, 2015
Location: East side, in a deluxe apartment in the sky.
   

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#176 » by Reeko » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:24 am

NyKnicks1714 wrote:
Reeko wrote:
NyKnicks1714 wrote:I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.

The tennis player?


Haha whoops. Close enough, not editing.

:lol: I respect that.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
AussieCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 13,019
And1: 24,234
Joined: Jan 02, 2014
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#177 » by AussieCeltic » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:24 am

Trae has drawn 3 fouls this quarter just barrelling into the defensive player and chucking a shot up. Then whined that he hasn’t got FT’s. He must’ve seen Woj’s tweet about the crackdown next year and is doing everything he can to cheat now
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
Jedi32
General Manager
Posts: 7,773
And1: 6,728
Joined: Oct 30, 2014
Location: Showtime Era
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#178 » by Jedi32 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:24 am

lol i knew some posters would whine about jokic after that foul. smh
User avatar
beeshma
Veteran
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,910
Joined: Mar 24, 2011

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#179 » by beeshma » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:25 am

For the first time in my life, I feel like the way the NBA games are ref'd has made me dislike the product.

No hard fouls? What is this about a windup being important? I don't give a s***.

Drawing a 3 point foul is the most boring tactic of all time, and yet it absolutely dominates the way offense and defense are played.
User avatar
BenoUdrihFTL
RealGM
Posts: 10,701
And1: 23,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2013
Location: Papa John's
 

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers] 

Post#180 » by BenoUdrihFTL » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:25 am

grumpysaddle wrote:
BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?

Difference is that he didn't seem to hit him in the face, and it wasn't as much of a wind-up. Hard foul, but Jokic's was super unnecessary.

Well the Simmons foul was ruled F1, so by definition of the rule it was deemed unnecessary. What elevates an F1 to an F2 is unnecessary AND excessive. I'd argue that body-checking Collins in midair was a bit excessive
1.61803398874989484820458683436563811772030917980576286
2135448622705260462818902449707207
204189391137484754088
0753868917521
26633862
22353
693

Return to The General Board