fattymcgee wrote:For those of you wanting Bledsoe, he was garbage last year. He's supposed to be a good defensive player but didn't play defense last year either.
Pelican fans were desperate to get him off the team.
Yep. Just say NO to Bledsoe.
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
fattymcgee wrote:For those of you wanting Bledsoe, he was garbage last year. He's supposed to be a good defensive player but didn't play defense last year either.
Pelican fans were desperate to get him off the team.
shrink wrote:I know he has been elevated around here for two years, but I’m still undecided on Nance. Maybe someone can get me on board?
1. How does he rank in Rosas three core areas? (Defend PnR, Protect the rim, Rebound)
2. I worry he’s only 6-8. This seems like more of a “last year” kind of SF/PF Rosas used to want as a PF.
3. He’s also only a 33% career 3P%.
Contract looks good, injuries not so much.
I’m open to be convinced, because I admit - I don’t know. Who’s got a good breakdown for me, either pro or con?
moss_is_1 wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:wolves_89 wrote:If Nance is on the market I'd put him at the top of the realistic trade options. His defense, rebounding, and 3pt shooting would be a great fit. If the Wolves could get him for some combination of expiring contracts (a couple of Juancho, Culver, and Layman) plus a protected pick I'd be ecstatic.
Protected pick...pass.
Agreed. I'm tired of us being in the lottery and having no picks because we trade them away.

shrink wrote:I know he has been elevated around here for two years, but I’m still undecided on Nance. Maybe someone can get me on board?
1. How does he rank in Rosas three core areas? (Defend PnR, Protect the rim, Rebound)
2. I worry he’s only 6-8. This seems like more of a “last year” kind of SF/PF Rosas used to want as a PF.
3. He’s also only a 33% career 3P%.
Contract looks good, injuries not so much.
I’m open to be convinced, because I admit - I don’t know. Who’s got a good breakdown for me, either pro or con?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wolves_89 wrote:shrink wrote:I know he has been elevated around here for two years, but I’m still undecided on Nance. Maybe someone can get me on board?
1. How does he rank in Rosas three core areas? (Defend PnR, Protect the rim, Rebound)
2. I worry he’s only 6-8. This seems like more of a “last year” kind of SF/PF Rosas used to want as a PF.
3. He’s also only a 33% career 3P%.
Contract looks good, injuries not so much.
I’m open to be convinced, because I admit - I don’t know. Who’s got a good breakdown for me, either pro or con?
From what I've seen, Nance is a plus defender who can switch onto multiple positions. He provides decent rim defense and is an above average rebounder for a PF. He doesn't have great height, but at 245lbs with a 7'1" wingspan he has no problem defending traditional PFs and has spent some time at C. His 3pt career shooting percentage doesn't stand out, but he has shot 35% and 36% the last two seasons. Basically, he is a role player who fits the Wolves needs really well.
The main concern would be with his health and staying on the floor, but that may be the reason he could be obtained at a pretty reasonable trade cost.
Nick K wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:
Protected pick...pass.
Agreed. I'm tired of us being in the lottery and having no picks because we trade them away.
I really think our days of being in the lottery are coming to an end. This is a critical off season. Just as long as we don't bleep it up.
Norseman79 wrote:shrink wrote:I know he has been elevated around here for two years, but I’m still undecided on Nance. Maybe someone can get me on board?
1. How does he rank in Rosas three core areas? (Defend PnR, Protect the rim, Rebound)
2. I worry he’s only 6-8. This seems like more of a “last year” kind of SF/PF Rosas used to want as a PF.
3. He’s also only a 33% career 3P%.
Contract looks good, injuries not so much.
I’m open to be convinced, because I admit - I don’t know. Who’s got a good breakdown for me, either pro or con?
I agree with all of this. 6'10 plus or don't bother. Finch wants legit size in the front court...more than just weight. If Nance costs you Culver, Juancho or Layman do it. I wouldn't give up anything better and I wouldn't consider Nance our starting PF.
Klomp wrote:wolves_89 wrote:If Nance is on the market I'd put him at the top of the realistic trade options. His defense, rebounding, and 3pt shooting would be a great fit. If the Wolves could get him for some combination of expiring contracts (a couple of Juancho, Culver, and Layman) plus a protected pick I'd be ecstatic.
Nance is one of those names that most fans would probably be underwhelmed by, but might be the type of players who would have the greatest impact on the team as a whole.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
jpatrick wrote:I think Nance is a decent player and good fit. Not sure what Rosas would give up though. He comes from the Morey school of thought that you only give up assets for players that move the needle. I don’t think Nance moves the needle.
Simmons, Isaac, Collins, Turner, Siakam, maybe even Gallo are needle movers. Nance no.
Norseman79 wrote:shrink wrote:I know he has been elevated around here for two years, but I’m still undecided on Nance. Maybe someone can get me on board?
1. How does he rank in Rosas three core areas? (Defend PnR, Protect the rim, Rebound)
2. I worry he’s only 6-8. This seems like more of a “last year” kind of SF/PF Rosas used to want as a PF.
3. He’s also only a 33% career 3P%.
Contract looks good, injuries not so much.
I’m open to be convinced, because I admit - I don’t know. Who’s got a good breakdown for me, either pro or con?
I agree with all of this. 6'10 plus or don't bother. Finch wants legit size in the front court...more than just weight. If Nance costs you Culver, Juancho or Layman do it. I wouldn't give up anything better and I wouldn't consider Nance our starting PF.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Krapinsky wrote:Has any non-wolves player been discussed more on this board than Larry Nance, Jr? We must have compiled a hundred plus pages over the year debating the merits of this league average forward.
If there was ever a team where he should have made an impact it was Cleveland last year with its void in the front court. Yet, he somehow only managed 1.8 winshares the entire season. Are we sure he is any good?
Krapinsky wrote:Has any non-wolves player been discussed more on this board than Larry Nance, Jr? We must have compiled a hundred plus pages over the year debating the merits of this league average forward.
If there was ever a team where he should have made an impact it was Cleveland last year with its void in the front court. Yet, he somehow only managed 1.8 winshares the entire season. Are we sure he is any good?
wolves_89 wrote:I'd compare Nance to a 25lb heavier version of Vanderbilt in terms of defense/rebounding. On offense he isn't going to carry a team, but he isn't going to be a major negative like Okogie/Vando. Teams will at least have to guard him on the perimeter.
fattymcgee wrote:Norseman79 wrote:shrink wrote:I know he has been elevated around here for two years, but I’m still undecided on Nance. Maybe someone can get me on board?
1. How does he rank in Rosas three core areas? (Defend PnR, Protect the rim, Rebound)
2. I worry he’s only 6-8. This seems like more of a “last year” kind of SF/PF Rosas used to want as a PF.
3. He’s also only a 33% career 3P%.
Contract looks good, injuries not so much.
I’m open to be convinced, because I admit - I don’t know. Who’s got a good breakdown for me, either pro or con?
I agree with all of this. 6'10 plus or don't bother. Finch wants legit size in the front court...more than just weight. If Nance costs you Culver, Juancho or Layman do it. I wouldn't give up anything better and I wouldn't consider Nance our starting PF.
It's rare to find a 6'10" PF anymore now that the NBA measures players barefoot instead of in shoes. Historically the prototypical PFs have been 6'8" - 6'9" barefoot.
wolves_89 wrote:I'd compare Nance to a 25lb heavier version of Vanderbilt in terms of defense/rebounding. On offense he isn't going to carry a team, but he isn't going to be a major negative like Okogie/Vando. Teams will at least have to guard him on the perimeter.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves