Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,757
- And1: 19,862
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Keep an eye on Harrell ending up here. He isn’t worth his contract since he can’t be played in the playoffs, but Rosas may feel that help winning regular season games is worth sticking his nose in for. That might not be true for WAS.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
IceManBK1
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,232
- And1: 330
- Joined: Jul 14, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
We need Beal to ask out so we can get simmons easily.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,282
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
moonpie wrote:?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1420842681698291719%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.realgm.com%2Fboards%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ft%3D2108480
Appears as if Morey is ready the room correctly.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,888
- And1: 864
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
shrink wrote:I hope the draft doesn’t distract them from Ricky’s wonderful Olympic performances.
He's been great but $50m at the PG position with a gaping hole at PF means they shouldn't be too enthralled either.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,757
- And1: 19,862
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Westbrook is just the start of tonight’s Point Guard Musical Chairs.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,017
- And1: 2,692
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,888
- And1: 864
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
_AIJ_ wrote:Losing Mcdaniels would hurt so much
Agreed. He could flame out but as constructed we need some core pieces that are not costly and even better if they have room to grow, dont need the ball to impact the game, and are two way players.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Calinks
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 50,426
- And1: 17,380
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,282
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
moonpie wrote:
I don't understand the move...
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,982
- And1: 1,295
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Surprised Wolves had to attach a 2nd to Rubio
Prince has been pretty disappointing player after decent 2nd season
they do save a little in salary and combo forward types are usually in higher demand than PGs if its from something down the line
Prince has been pretty disappointing player after decent 2nd season
they do save a little in salary and combo forward types are usually in higher demand than PGs if its from something down the line
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,017
- And1: 2,692
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
I don't really like this trade tbh unless there's some follow up move. Prince is a decent player, maybe they view him as a Crowder-type 4, but Crowder outweighs him by 30 lbs at least. Still we gave up an asset in a 2nd round pick...
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Neeva
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,594
- And1: 2,952
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
This is awful Rosas needs to get fired.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,982
- And1: 1,295
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Baseline81 wrote:moonpie wrote:
I don't understand the move...
only thing I can think of is if its for something larger down the line where a combo forward would be more attractive to the team than a PG, some salary saving too
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Howard Cosell
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,181
- And1: 313
- Joined: Jun 01, 2013
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
The trade as a stand-alone makes no sense.
None whatsoever.
None whatsoever.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,017
- And1: 2,692
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,282
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Edit: See moonpie's post above.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
IceManBK1
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,232
- And1: 330
- Joined: Jul 14, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
moonpie wrote:
I don't really like this trade tbh unless there's some follow up move. Prince is a decent player, maybe they view him as a Crowder-type 4, but Crowder outweighs him by 30 lbs at least. Still we gave up an asset in a 2nd round pick...
maybe that's why he struggled..he's not a 4.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Calinks
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 50,426
- And1: 17,380
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Rubio was a poor fit here, the trade for him in the first place is questionable when you looked at how the team used him. Rosas and Finch seem like they are going to try to get cheap players that fit their system, if Prince shines the trade will be a homerun, if not, they will move him again in the future.
I don't think we will make any big splashes, we are probably hoping to hit big on players we that can come in here and have their strengths accentuated.
I don't think we will make any big splashes, we are probably hoping to hit big on players we that can come in here and have their strengths accentuated.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,017
- And1: 2,692
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
That 2022 2nd rounder is via Washington it looks like
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves





