E S V L wrote:psman2 wrote:Room exception targets? $4,910,000
Monk or Terence Davis?
Can we trade this exception in return of a couple of 2nds? That would be nice.
No can only be used to sign players. Can be a SNT though.
E S V L wrote:psman2 wrote:Room exception targets? $4,910,000
Monk or Terence Davis?
Can we trade this exception in return of a couple of 2nds? That would be nice.
psman2 wrote:E S V L wrote:psman2 wrote:Room exception targets? $4,910,000
Monk or Terence Davis?
Can we trade this exception in return of a couple of 2nds? That would be nice.
No can only be used to sign players. Can be a SNT though.
psman2 wrote:OK so both of my room exceptions guys are gone....cheap too.
So who else is out there? We have a deep roster, but think we could land somebody and work a trade to alleviate depth issues.
Winslow back? It getting rather bleak out there. Cannot see Oubre taking it, and GS wouldn't take Bledsoe in a SNT and I wouldn't want to pay to dump on OKC to sign Oubre, so he is likely not a target.
So anyone else? Overseas guy maybe? Nigel Hayes looks like he could be a 3ND guy...maybe Tyler Dorsey back...he has looked nice overseas.
E S V L wrote:What are the time expectations for the NOP trade finalization?
VCfor3 wrote:E S V L wrote:What are the time expectations for the NOP trade finalization?
I want to say tomorrow is the first day that it can become official though they don't have to do it then if they are trying to wait and add something to the deal.
E S V L wrote:VCfor3 wrote:E S V L wrote:What are the time expectations for the NOP trade finalization?
I want to say tomorrow is the first day that it can become official though they don't have to do it then if they are trying to wait and add something to the deal.
Any deadline?
psman2 wrote:Do we have plans for the little bit of cap space we created around 4.5m under I belief. Winslow is gone. Have the room exception too.
Anderson extension. Would he take something around 13-14m we can now offer? 4/50 seems like a nice number.
If we decide to play Bledsoe in the rotation then maybe a Jones trade. Josh Hart maybe? Depth at the 2/3.
VCfor3 wrote:psman2 wrote:Do we have plans for the little bit of cap space we created around 4.5m under I belief. Winslow is gone. Have the room exception too.
Anderson extension. Would he take something around 13-14m we can now offer? 4/50 seems like a nice number.
If we decide to play Bledsoe in the rotation then maybe a Jones trade. Josh Hart maybe? Depth at the 2/3.
I could see either Josh Hart (though that mucks up the SG rotation again ha) or an Anderson extension.
I honestly wouldn't be upset if we kept the space into the year. Some may get used to sign Tillie and/or Santi, but having pure cap space for a small dump could net us a 2nd or two at the deadline from a team trying to duck the tax.
psman2 wrote:VCfor3 wrote:psman2 wrote:Do we have plans for the little bit of cap space we created around 4.5m under I belief. Winslow is gone. Have the room exception too.
Anderson extension. Would he take something around 13-14m we can now offer? 4/50 seems like a nice number.
If we decide to play Bledsoe in the rotation then maybe a Jones trade. Josh Hart maybe? Depth at the 2/3.
I could see either Josh Hart (though that mucks up the SG rotation again ha) or an Anderson extension.
I honestly wouldn't be upset if we kept the space into the year. Some may get used to sign Tillie and/or Santi, but having pure cap space for a small dump could net us a 2nd or two at the deadline from a team trying to duck the tax.
I am hoping that JJJ sees most of his minutes at the five, thus Anderson gets the bulk of the four minutes. So If that is true there could be some 3 minutes open until Williams if ready behind Brooks. So I don't mind Hart since I think he can defend the 3 without too much of a drop off. But maybe just giving Bane and Melton all the minutes they can handle to see what we have there is the better play and like Clarke/Anderson get minutes at 3. I like Hart but he is still just basically a jag.
I guess a lot depends on if we want to be a cap space team next year. JJJ extension could dictate that some if it gets done.
VCfor3 wrote:psman2 wrote:VCfor3 wrote:I could see either Josh Hart (though that mucks up the SG rotation again ha) or an Anderson extension.
I honestly wouldn't be upset if we kept the space into the year. Some may get used to sign Tillie and/or Santi, but having pure cap space for a small dump could net us a 2nd or two at the deadline from a team trying to duck the tax.
I am hoping that JJJ sees most of his minutes at the five, thus Anderson gets the bulk of the four minutes. So If that is true there could be some 3 minutes open until Williams if ready behind Brooks. So I don't mind Hart since I think he can defend the 3 without too much of a drop off. But maybe just giving Bane and Melton all the minutes they can handle to see what we have there is the better play and like Clarke/Anderson get minutes at 3. I like Hart but he is still just basically a jag.
I guess a lot depends on if we want to be a cap space team next year. JJJ extension could dictate that some if it gets done.
I agree on Hart. I kind of wonder if we give Ziaire most of the backup 3 minutes behind Brooks anyway just to try and develop him. We may miss the playoffs, but I think the FO is okay with that. Afterwards you really have to start thinking of switching to a more win-now mindset, but for not a slower long term plan is fine.
E S V L wrote:Are we turning Kanchar into a pointguard?
E S V L wrote:I want to write an article about why I have always disliked JV as a player and loved Adams for the same reason, but I don’t believe it can be seen as anything beyond my subjective view.
SD2042 wrote:E S V L wrote:I want to write an article about why I have always disliked JV as a player and loved Adams for the same reason, but I don’t believe it can be seen as anything beyond my subjective view.
If you have the research and evidence to back up your story. Perhaps it may not come across as just a subjective view.