DCasey91 wrote:See the report about praying for Lillard and the Sixers waiting on it?
This might actually be the downfall here. I understand going for a superstar for a higher variance always, but wisdom says this may not be the best approach at all.
1. What gives the Sixers organization the idea that Blazers would ever take our package? When it’s unbelievably obvious that other packages would blow us out the water (Shai/Ingram/Edwards plus picks).
2. Mules don’t change. What’s to say Ben will comeback and play close to his value again here.
3. Blazers start 10-5. Now the realistic scenario is they start this well, Ben still hasn’t suited up, we have no PG and we aren’t a contender. That’s a proposition that can in fact happen.
In the meantime there’s been zero work around the edges moves which for me have been disappointing. Because it does two things:
1. Makes us better for the short/medium/long term.
2. Well what do you know makes the big potential trade package look more enticing.
Downfall? Trading Simmons for scraps would be a downfall.
I'm not going to say they'll get what they want, but I'm pretty sure if they have to settle for trading Simmons for Brogdon then this team will be on the decline.
Also, not sure what you mean by working the edges. They upgraded Scott to Niang. Their roster (outside Simmons) is better this year than last year with a couple more young guys on the roster.
For #1 and #3, don't be so caught up in the specific report headline, they would trade for another star if they could. They are doing their best to work themselves into that situation. The report even states their flexibility if you read it.
For #2, Simmons for better/worse has been the same player for the past four years. I don't even know if he'll play, but if the small chance he does, he'll probably look the same. Not sure why you would suddenly think he would fall off.