DCasey91 wrote:Legacy Death & Taxes is the GOAT best deck, so much fun to play.
Play me in Arena
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

DCasey91 wrote:Legacy Death & Taxes is the GOAT best deck, so much fun to play.
Yeah, gonna have to color me skeptical. I did a quick search for a few older drafts and it looked like a crap shoot.Sixerscan wrote:DCasey91 wrote:zaz102 wrote:Can provide proof of the Draft board thoroughly outperforming NBA Scouts? That's really hard to believe.
Unless you mean one person was right about one guy, somebody else was right about another, etc. without a real concensus.
Or is there a particular person who is really good at picking. Genuinely interested as I haven't really noticed this in the past.
NBA draft board means collective. Some good some bad but the read is very thorough and fine combed much more than anywhere else on this forum besides player comps board.
These are two that are by far the best on info not close. The posters on there do one heck of a great job
Off the top of my head:
1. Bang on the mark with Ben (that thread is unbelievably precise on the evaluation).
2. Jalen Green
3. Cade and his concerns
4. Shai love was very very high before draft rankings were even close to his range and got it wrong.
5. MPJ/Jalen Johnson
6. Luka (huge mishap).
7. Emoni Bates. Watch it change frequency because of what is stalling point is this year. Watch for it in due time
8. Sengun
Don’t take it from me go see for yourself and use your own judgement on it.
Cloning was really hard to believe but it happened yonks ago lol (okay extreme example).
The hive mind so to speak in both sectors just have better quality of threads. You’ll learn abit if you go in with open discourse.
Half of these guys haven't even played a minute in the league yet what are you talking about.
I get that there are some good posters on the draft board and am glad you enjoy it but if you take all that to mean you can be certain on what a team should do with the 28th pick in the draft you have completely missed the mark.
There's also just an incredible amount of confirmation bias and circular logic going on here. Just because you "don't have time" for role players like Korkmaz or Thybulle because you don't like their games that doesn't mean you are right. There are plenty of people around the league that if you did a redraft of those drafts would take those guys where they were taken if not higher. Likewise if you overvalue shot creation or whatever this is based on (please don't explain it) and then say in retrospect say you are right because they showed those same skills in the pros it doesn't make you right.

Stanford wrote:i like starter deck yugi
DCasey91 wrote:I mean I understand you have problems not listening to what I have said about putting statements that I’ve never claimed. Literally three times in quick succession. You must get that a lot in real life
Okay if that’s your view then so be it. The NBA GM draft board on the whole is a better evaluator of talent then NBA Scouts on the whole. Then by saying that they are elite talent evaluators in your eyes.
Have a good day enjoy your life don’t want to talk to a person who doesn’t listen.
DCasey91 wrote:For about the past five seasons the RealGM draft Board has thoroughly outperformed NBA scouts on the whole.
With way less resources they are very measured a fine-combed over there. They also pickup prospects on higher on the draft order long before media catches wind of it and yet still prospects get over/underdrafted come draft day.
Luka was always 1 that draft started at 2 (Trae).
Shai was the camel that broke the camels back for me. Murphy III just well and truly sealed it.
I trust my own judgement and some others here. They put the time in and actually use logic.
Look at mine and others lists of prospects this year. They are a flying out the wazoo.
Sixerscan wrote:DCasey91 wrote:zaz102 wrote:Can provide proof of the Draft board thoroughly outperforming NBA Scouts? That's really hard to believe.
Unless you mean one person was right about one guy, somebody else was right about another, etc. without a real concensus.
Or is there a particular person who is really good at picking. Genuinely interested as I haven't really noticed this in the past.
NBA draft board means collective. Some good some bad but the read is very thorough and fine combed much more than anywhere else on this forum besides player comps board.
These are two that are by far the best on info not close. The posters on there do one heck of a great job
Off the top of my head:
1. Bang on the mark with Ben (that thread is unbelievably precise on the evaluation).
2. Jalen Green
3. Cade and his concerns
4. Shai love was very very high before draft rankings were even close to his range and got it wrong.
5. MPJ/Jalen Johnson
6. Luka (huge mishap).
7. Emoni Bates. Watch it change frequency because of what is stalling point is this year. Watch for it in due time
8. Sengun
Don’t take it from me go see for yourself and use your own judgement on it.
Cloning was really hard to believe but it happened yonks ago lol (okay extreme example).
The hive mind so to speak in both sectors just have better quality of threads. You’ll learn abit if you go in with open discourse.
Half of these guys haven't even played a minute in the league yet what are you talking about.
I get that there are some good posters on the draft board and am glad you enjoy it but if you take all that to mean you can be certain on what a team should do with the 28th pick in the draft you have completely missed the mark.
There's also just an incredible amount of confirmation bias and circular logic going on here. Just because you "don't have time" for role players like Korkmaz or Thybulle because you don't like their games that doesn't mean you are right. There are plenty of people around the league that if you did a redraft of those drafts would take those guys where they were taken if not higher. Likewise if you overvalue shot creation or whatever this is based on (please don't explain it) and then say in retrospect say you are right because they showed those same skills in the pros it doesn't make you right.
Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Legacy Death & Taxes is the GOAT best deck, so much fun to play.
Play me in Arena

zaz102 wrote:Yeah, gonna have to color me skeptical. I did a quick search for a few older drafts and it looked like a crap shoot.Sixerscan wrote:DCasey91 wrote:
NBA draft board means collective. Some good some bad but the read is very thorough and fine combed much more than anywhere else on this forum besides player comps board.
These are two that are by far the best on info not close. The posters on there do one heck of a great job
Off the top of my head:
1. Bang on the mark with Ben (that thread is unbelievably precise on the evaluation).
2. Jalen Green
3. Cade and his concerns
4. Shai love was very very high before draft rankings were even close to his range and got it wrong.
5. MPJ/Jalen Johnson
6. Luka (huge mishap).
7. Emoni Bates. Watch it change frequency because of what is stalling point is this year. Watch for it in due time
8. Sengun
Don’t take it from me go see for yourself and use your own judgement on it.
Cloning was really hard to believe but it happened yonks ago lol (okay extreme example).
The hive mind so to speak in both sectors just have better quality of threads. You’ll learn abit if you go in with open discourse.
Half of these guys haven't even played a minute in the league yet what are you talking about.
I get that there are some good posters on the draft board and am glad you enjoy it but if you take all that to mean you can be certain on what a team should do with the 28th pick in the draft you have completely missed the mark.
There's also just an incredible amount of confirmation bias and circular logic going on here. Just because you "don't have time" for role players like Korkmaz or Thybulle because you don't like their games that doesn't mean you are right. There are plenty of people around the league that if you did a redraft of those drafts would take those guys where they were taken if not higher. Likewise if you overvalue shot creation or whatever this is based on (please don't explain it) and then say in retrospect say you are right because they showed those same skills in the pros it doesn't make you right.
Could also be you remember someone being right about something specific, but completely wrong on other items, but those may be easily forgotten.
I'll look out for some type of pattern, but I don't know, I was hoping you could provide something a little more concrete so I could follow and learn something.
Stanford wrote:

DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:
Played Burn, Bro played equipment.... Mage Power can go F itself.
Also disliked but enjoyed playing pot of greed and graceful charity. Unbalanced card draw = quickest to setting up wins lol
Yugioh was so busted and op but that was what made it fun the brokenness of it.
DCasey91 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:
Leveraged investments
Where’s Tomjas saying Ben is loaded?
Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:
Played Burn, Bro played equipment.... Mage Power can go F itself.
Also disliked but enjoyed playing pot of greed and graceful charity. Unbalanced card draw = quickest to setting up wins lol
Yugioh was so busted and op but that was what made it fun the brokenness of it.
My friends and I used the tournament ban list. I mostly played a fiend deck inspired by Yami Bakura w/Dark Necrofear shenanigans. So much flavor.
No one in my circles could ever get burn to work consistently.

DCasey91 wrote:Yeah Burn was okay at 4000LP
Bro had Maha Vailo’s a stack of compounding equipment with board wipes/kills and counter/draw play it got out of control so quickly lol
Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Yeah Burn was okay at 4000LP
Burn would be super OP at 4000LP.Bro had Maha Vailo’s a stack of compounding equipment with board wipes/kills and counter/draw play it got out of control so quickly lol
The meta in my town was to run a **** ton of hard removal so things like Maha Vailo that put a stack of resources on one card would be no good.
Yugi's deck was straight trash tho. Who was sacking two for gaia the fierce knight? trash

Stanford wrote:Yeah Jinzo rules. Was so pumped when it was released as a promo card so I could actually afford one.

DCasey91 wrote:What do you play in mtg?

Tomjas wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:
Leveraged investments
Where’s Tomjas saying Ben is loaded?
Why would he keep homes in a city where he doesn’t live?
Lowry sold his house in Canada well before being traded