ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#281 » by karch34 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 4:11 am

I think we need to move Layman and a 2nd to free up a signing of someone with size. He’s a SF, but we have McD, Prince, and Bolmoro that fit best at the 3.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#282 » by SO_MONEY » Sun Oct 17, 2021 4:50 pm

karch34 wrote:I think we need to move Layman and a 2nd to free up a signing of someone with size. He’s a SF, but we have McD, Prince, and Bolmoro that fit best at the 3.


Or just swap him for a need. But, yup, do something with Layman.
Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 856
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#283 » by Folklore » Thu Oct 21, 2021 1:02 am

Domejandro wrote:
Folklore wrote:
Domejandro wrote:No shot Minnesota poaches a terrific role player like DFS for nothing. Dude is really good and locked in for peanuts.


Have you seen his stats? He was only playing because Dwight Powell was out.

With respect, this is objectively untrue. Like, not even remotely accurate.


I admit I did very little research on DFS. I was just looking to make the money work to get Moses Brown.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,093
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#284 » by winforlose » Thu Oct 21, 2021 2:53 am

Paul Reed only played garbage time for the 76ers. I am not convinced he is in their long term plans. Not quite sure what they need, but he would be big if we could get him. I would gladly give both 2nd round picks and a layman or Nowell.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,345
And1: 19,374
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#285 » by shrink » Thu Oct 21, 2021 12:42 pm

A recent Trade Board thread the question, “Who on your own team is a “sell high” candidate?

Right now, I don’t think that’s anyone on the Timberwolves. Even players with good stats have the stench of losing seasons depressing their trade value. I enjoy a good trade as much as anyone, so hopefully a strong, winning, start to the season will help many of our players recover their trade value and allow us to get full value if we make a trade.

In the meantime, I’m going to forget about trades, and just sit back and enjoy the wins this team gives me.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#286 » by Krapinsky » Thu Oct 21, 2021 12:53 pm

Chimezie Metu and Bagley both got DNP’s. I like Metu, who plays more within himself then Bagley.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,899
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#287 » by Dewey » Thu Oct 21, 2021 12:57 pm

Season has started … imo it’s time to move on and look for potential moves for PF at the deadline.

Reid better bump his defense of he’s not gonna get the minutes he expects. That has to be his focus if he wants to prove worthy long-term in the NBA - last night was not a positive for him. His value will tumble of Finch is unable to get him playing man basketball.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,011
And1: 22,555
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#288 » by Klomp » Thu Oct 21, 2021 1:19 pm

shrink wrote:A recent Trade Board thread the question, “Who on your own team is a “sell high” candidate?

Right now, I don’t think that’s anyone on the Timberwolves. Even players with good stats have the stench of losing seasons depressing their trade value. I enjoy a good trade as much as anyone, so hopefully a strong, winning, start to the season will help many of our players recover their trade value and allow us to get full value if we make a trade.

In the meantime, I’m going to forget about trades, and just sit back and enjoy the wins this team gives me.

When throwing contract situation into the mix, I think maybe the best candidate would be Naz Reid. RFA tends to depress contract value, and when you throw Reid's limited minutes behind Towns, I think some could see untapped potential and a chance to get a bargain.

While you could say we wouldn't be getting his full return because of those things, think about it in terms of what we could potentially get in return for a 15-20 mpg backup. Because with Towns, that will essentially be his role here.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
old school 34
Senior
Posts: 645
And1: 240
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#289 » by old school 34 » Fri Oct 22, 2021 7:35 pm

winforlose wrote:Paul Reed only played garbage time for the 76ers. I am not convinced he is in their long term plans. Not quite sure what they need, but he would be big if we could get him. I would gladly give both 2nd round picks and a layman or Nowell.
Nowell & whatever else for Reed seems like perfect roster balancing type of move....just don't see 76ers selling on him until they're 100% certain they know how the BS deal is going to go?

Not that now is an active time anyways....but the sooner we can add another big type it would be so helpful & so many teams will be on hold until BS is traded...

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,093
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#290 » by winforlose » Fri Oct 22, 2021 7:45 pm

old school 34 wrote:
winforlose wrote:Paul Reed only played garbage time for the 76ers. I am not convinced he is in their long term plans. Not quite sure what they need, but he would be big if we could get him. I would gladly give both 2nd round picks and a layman or Nowell.
Nowell & whatever else for Reed seems like perfect roster balancing type of move....just don't see 76ers selling on him until they're 100% certain they know how the BS deal is going to go?

Not that now is an active time anyways....but the sooner we can add another big type it would be so helpful & so many teams will be on hold until BS is traded...

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app


I am not sure they are holding him until BS moves. I could also see us giving them the rights to Knight so we can get another two way to replace the outgoing player and so can they. Reed is a third string behind both Embiid and Drummond, I don’t think he is high priority for them.

You are correct that this is not a typically active trade time, but our needs are immediate and the scope of the deal would be minor, so it could happen whenever.
old school 34
Senior
Posts: 645
And1: 240
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#291 » by old school 34 » Fri Oct 22, 2021 8:17 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:A recent Trade Board thread the question, “Who on your own team is a “sell high” candidate?

Right now, I don’t think that’s anyone on the Timberwolves. Even players with good stats have the stench of losing seasons depressing their trade value. I enjoy a good trade as much as anyone, so hopefully a strong, winning, start to the season will help many of our players recover their trade value and allow us to get full value if we make a trade.

In the meantime, I’m going to forget about trades, and just sit back and enjoy the wins this team gives me.

When throwing contract situation into the mix, I think maybe the best candidate would be Naz Reid. RFA tends to depress contract value, and when you throw Reid's limited minutes behind Towns, I think some could see untapped potential and a chance to get a bargain.

While you could say we wouldn't be getting his full return because of those things, think about it in terms of what we could potentially get in return for a 15-20 mpg backup. Because with Towns, that will essentially be his role here.
While I agree with parts of that case that he could be a sell high guy....you just can't consider moving him with the lack of other bigs on the roster can you?

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,093
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#292 » by winforlose » Fri Oct 22, 2021 10:00 pm

old school 34 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:A recent Trade Board thread the question, “Who on your own team is a “sell high” candidate?

Right now, I don’t think that’s anyone on the Timberwolves. Even players with good stats have the stench of losing seasons depressing their trade value. I enjoy a good trade as much as anyone, so hopefully a strong, winning, start to the season will help many of our players recover their trade value and allow us to get full value if we make a trade.

In the meantime, I’m going to forget about trades, and just sit back and enjoy the wins this team gives me.

When throwing contract situation into the mix, I think maybe the best candidate would be Naz Reid. RFA tends to depress contract value, and when you throw Reid's limited minutes behind Towns, I think some could see untapped potential and a chance to get a bargain.

While you could say we wouldn't be getting his full return because of those things, think about it in terms of what we could potentially get in return for a 15-20 mpg backup. Because with Towns, that will essentially be his role here.
While I agree with parts of that case that he could be a sell high guy....you just can't consider moving him with the lack of other bigs on the roster can you?

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app


Only Vando and MCD are large enough to play the 5 and neither of them is heavy enough or strong enough. It would exacerbate the small ball problem. Naz must stay where he is.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,011
And1: 22,555
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#293 » by Klomp » Fri Oct 22, 2021 10:36 pm

old school 34 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:A recent Trade Board thread the question, “Who on your own team is a “sell high” candidate?

Right now, I don’t think that’s anyone on the Timberwolves. Even players with good stats have the stench of losing seasons depressing their trade value. I enjoy a good trade as much as anyone, so hopefully a strong, winning, start to the season will help many of our players recover their trade value and allow us to get full value if we make a trade.

In the meantime, I’m going to forget about trades, and just sit back and enjoy the wins this team gives me.

When throwing contract situation into the mix, I think maybe the best candidate would be Naz Reid. RFA tends to depress contract value, and when you throw Reid's limited minutes behind Towns, I think some could see untapped potential and a chance to get a bargain.

While you could say we wouldn't be getting his full return because of those things, think about it in terms of what we could potentially get in return for a 15-20 mpg backup. Because with Towns, that will essentially be his role here.
While I agree with parts of that case that he could be a sell high guy....you just can't consider moving him with the lack of other bigs on the roster can you?

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app

There are free agent centers who could fill the void
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,011
And1: 22,555
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#294 » by Klomp » Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:52 pm

I think Dallas could be a prime trade partner. They have a couple of areas that we lack in:
Bigs (Powell, Kleber, Cauley-Stein
3/D Wings (Bullock, Green)

What can we offer them? If shooting is what they need, offer Beasley. If they want more floor-spacing posts, could offer Reid.

They are a team that could be in flux by the deadline and may be itching to make a move. Could we capitalize on their misfortune?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,443
And1: 2,859
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#295 » by Neeva » Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:17 pm

Hmmm

Layman/Reid for Boucher/2nd

Beasley for Kleber/Brunson.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#296 » by SO_MONEY » Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:48 pm

Klomp wrote:I think Dallas could be a prime trade partner. They have a couple of areas that we lack in:
Bigs (Powell, Kleber, Cauley-Stein
3/D Wings (Bullock, Green)

What can we offer them? If shooting is what they need, offer Beasley. If they want more floor-spacing posts, could offer Reid.

They are a team that could be in flux by the deadline and may be itching to make a move. Could we capitalize on their misfortune?


If we are trading Beasley or Reid we better be getting much more back, just saying...
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,443
And1: 2,859
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#297 » by Neeva » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:49 am

:banghead:
Neeva wrote:Hmmm

Layman/Reid for Boucher/2nd

Beasley for Kleber/Brunson.


Forget these Kleber/Brunson/Boucher all look like trash so far.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,516
And1: 6,591
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#298 » by shangrila » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:51 am

Dallas basically already has Beasley in Hardaway Jr, I doubt there’s much interest.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,345
And1: 19,374
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#299 » by shrink » Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:35 am

I like Boucher and Kleiber as low cost targets.

I noticed Thad Young was the Spurs only DNP-CD on the whole roster in their first game. He had a decent season last year with the Bulls. I know his wife didn’t like Minneapolis, and he’s not flashy, but adding a PF wouldn’t hurt.
User avatar
Takingbaconback
Head Coach
Posts: 6,952
And1: 2,625
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#300 » by Takingbaconback » Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:38 am

Wonder if Clips would be willing to trade Luke Kennard. He would be a reliable shooting option next to DLO, Edwards, and KAT. I would love to see Wolves make a run at Bertans as well.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves