sbsat wrote:RoyceDa59 wrote:I think Barnes and Mobley are the clear cut top 2 players from this draft class so far.
We’ll see what Cade brings to the table.
Duarte has also been incredible
Don't leave Giddey out of this either. He's been good.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
sbsat wrote:RoyceDa59 wrote:I think Barnes and Mobley are the clear cut top 2 players from this draft class so far.
We’ll see what Cade brings to the table.
Duarte has also been incredible
PD28 wrote:As high as I've been on OG, Barnes is a great example of a prospect on a whole other tier -
This is their Rookie stats at the same age. Obviously OG didn't get the same minutes/opportunity but there is no chance he would've been as successful that early in his career. It's only been these last two years that OG has developed a more comfortable handle while Barnes' practically starting off from that point.
I don't believe Barnes will be a better wing defender than OG but will be a more versatile defender when he hits his prime.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
manjusaka wrote:And1Skip wrote:I was surprised at how early Nurse has been publicly hammering down that Scottie needs to be aggressive to the basket EVERY time. Like he's been talking about this every day and I'm sure he talks to Scottie about this way more. I think the organization is trying to change Scottie's mentality early to be a scorer first and distributor second as he is eventually going to be come that #1 option superstar surrounded by great #2/#3s.
Like last night's game he was being more aggressive but I think he started off like 1-6. He ended up going 8-17 with 18 pts and 7 assists so Nurse was right. The more aggressive he is, the assists will add up because teams would be paying more attention for him to score. Once he develops a 3pt shot, that 18 pts will be regularly in the 20s.
Nurse is right. Scottie himself doesn’t know how talented he is scoring wise. If he can expand the range to 3pt and improves his footwork under the basket. I believe he can average 25pts easily.
HumbleRen wrote:How do you guys think Scottie’s usage and overall game will be impacted by Siakam’s return ?
They relatively hover around the same parts of the floor to get their offence flowing. Will Scottie be relegated to a 5th option on the floor ? Or will he continue to get 15-18 points a game by doing the dirty work.
OakleyDokely wrote:Remember when we were all upset on draft night (myself included) that we passed on one of the big 4 for a zero level scorer. Fun times.
Trust Masai.
ItsDanger wrote:Have they toned down Scottie's exuberance? Not surprising if true. You're only young once. Too bad, I liked that about him.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
anj wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Remember when we were all upset on draft night (myself included) that we passed on one of the big 4 for a zero level scorer. Fun times.
Trust Masai.
+10000. Disappointed that the RealGM post history function is down (at least for me?). I would happily dredge up my draft-night posts that expose me as a complete idiot.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Have they toned down Scottie's exuberance? Not surprising if true. You're only young once. Too bad, I liked that about him.
it seems like it. he doesn't yell after a dunk. everything seems toned down.
its what they do in San Antonio too. no showboating, keep it professional. I like it and I don't like - I get what you mean about Scottie Barnes - its seemingly his nature to be like that and thats what I like about him as well.
will wrote:LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Have they toned down Scottie's exuberance? Not surprising if true. You're only young once. Too bad, I liked that about him.
it seems like it. he doesn't yell after a dunk. everything seems toned down.
its what they do in San Antonio too. no showboating, keep it professional. I like it and I don't like - I get what you mean about Scottie Barnes - its seemingly his nature to be like that and thats what I like about him as well.
I miss the clapping already.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:will wrote:LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:
it seems like it. he doesn't yell after a dunk. everything seems toned down.
its what they do in San Antonio too. no showboating, keep it professional. I like it and I don't like - I get what you mean about Scottie Barnes - its seemingly his nature to be like that and thats what I like about him as well.
I miss the clapping already.
yes. same. its what was fun about Barnes but I understand why he can't do it. he could get a tech for taunting, down the road etc.
Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:PD28 wrote:As high as I've been on OG, Barnes is a great example of a prospect on a whole other tier -
This is their Rookie stats at the same age. Obviously OG didn't get the same minutes/opportunity but there is no chance he would've been as successful that early in his career. It's only been these last two years that OG has developed a more comfortable handle while Barnes' practically starting off from that point.
I don't believe Barnes will be a better wing defender than OG but will be a more versatile defender when he hits his prime.
Ya even though OG was a lottery level talent before his injury/surgery in college, his handles and jumper were nowhere to be seen until the last 2-3 years. Especially his handles.
He was like 2 years from being 2 years away kinda.
Value at his draft selection is huge value/steal.
anj wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Remember when we were all upset on draft night (myself included) that we passed on one of the big 4 for a zero level scorer. Fun times.
Trust Masai.
+10000. Disappointed that the RealGM post history function is down (at least for me?). I would happily dredge up my draft-night posts that expose me as a complete idiot.
ash_k wrote:I wanted my Ben Simmons, I got my Ben in Barnes. Exactly the same type of player (PG|SG|SF|PF). The game belongs to them.
Now that some have been humbled. Let's say we would have drafted Suggs and then traded him to Philly for Simmons?
Looking at Suggs right now, what would you be thinking? would you be upset?
Our starting 5 would a NBA finals contender FVV|OG|Simmons|Siakam|Stretch 5
Spare the Hawks series tunnel vision. He averaged a triple-double the round prior
ash_k wrote:I wanted my Ben Simmons, I got my Ben in Barnes. Exactly the same type of player (PG|SG|SF|PF). The game belongs to them.
Now that some have been humbled. Let's say we would have drafted Suggs and then traded him to Philly for Simmons?
Looking at Suggs right now, what would you be thinking? would you be upset?
Our starting 5 would a NBA finals contender FVV|OG|Simmons|Siakam|Stretch 5
Spare the Hawks series tunnel vision. He averaged a triple-double the round prior