_AIJ_ wrote:And why do KATs low post moves looks weird and difficult?
He’s super gangly and physically inefficient.
Night and day, the opposite of Jokic, who pretty much just stands there and takes what the D gives him.
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
_AIJ_ wrote:And why do KATs low post moves looks weird and difficult?
Merc_Porto wrote:minimus wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:
Come on now. You sound like he's not saying the true here.
Not to sound pessimistic after an unly defeat but man, i hope this was a monster wake up call for the delusionals.
THIS TEAM IS NOT THAT GOOD!
This team might not looking good in some games, but I believe that fans suppose to support their teams, and not $h1t on players and organisation after every problem, like Foye does. That is not like grown men act, that is why I start to believe that he has problems.
I believe is too many years of experience, of the same mistakes. It's not like he didn't say to begin that this team wasn't good enough.
Grown men don't live in a fantasy world all the time.
And some people live in a fantasy world to think this team is good enough to do anything with this core. It's not.
It's a team that lives and dies by flashes of good shooting nights, period.
winforlose wrote:
We are getting open 3s because teams are collapsing in the paint and forcing us to shoot outside. We have a team of guys whose career numbers are better than their season numbers and six games in you are saying they suck.
Merc_Porto wrote:winforlose wrote:
We are getting open 3s because teams are collapsing in the paint and forcing us to shoot outside. We have a team of guys whose career numbers are better than their season numbers and six games in you are saying they suck.
I wish it was only for 6 games. But no, not at all.
Almost 2 years now tbh. Healthy, not healthy, this is not a great team. Is a bunch of individualities that don't fit each other at all and never will. Is not a matter of figuring out with these guys.
The team needs a massive adjustment around KAT-Edwards.
Yes, we are still going to win a bunch of games, but I seriously doubt that is going to be enough to get to the playoffs.
This is a definition of a treadmill team. So, don't try to pretend this is an overreaction after 6 games.
Not for me, and definitely not for FOYE as well.
Merc_Porto wrote:minimus wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:
Come on now. You sound like he's not saying the true here.
Not to sound pessimistic after an unly defeat but man, i hope this was a monster wake up call for the delusionals.
THIS TEAM IS NOT THAT GOOD!
This team might not looking good in some games, but I believe that fans suppose to support their teams, and not $h1t on players and organisation after every problem, like Foye does. That is not like grown men act, that is why I start to believe that he has problems.
I believe is too many years of experience, of the same mistakes. It's not like he didn't say to begin that this team wasn't good enough.
Grown men don't live in a fantasy world all the time.
And some people live in a fantasy world to think this team is good enough to do anything with this core. It's not.
It's a team that lives and dies by flashes of good shooting nights, period.
bluethunder0005 wrote:Lot of players are talking about how much they hate the new basketball and how it's hurting shooting. In general, awful loss last night but it's realistically what teams of the Wolves caliber will do being a fringe playoff team. Capable of beating everyone like the Bucks a few nights ago but also losing to anyone like the Pelicans and Magic. It's disappointing because we always want to see our team beat the less talented teams but let's be real, even if this team played up to it's potential every night, it's no more than a 45ish win team.
winforlose wrote:bluethunder0005 wrote:Lot of players are talking about how much they hate the new basketball and how it's hurting shooting. In general, awful loss last night but it's realistically what teams of the Wolves caliber will do being a fringe playoff team. Capable of beating everyone like the Bucks a few nights ago but also losing to anyone like the Pelicans and Magic. It's disappointing because we always want to see our team beat the less talented teams but let's be real, even if this team played up to it's potential every night, it's no more than a 45ish win team.
Please help me understand this take. Last season we ducked because our defense was not up to snuff and because we lost KAT for 22 games early and we couldn’t compensate. This season our defense has improved, and Ant is supposed to be far enough along to help take the burden off of KAT. You have Prince, Beasley, Dlo, MCD, JMAC, and Ant all shooting below their numbers last season and their career numbers. In some cases by more than 20%. We are missing open 3s at an alarming rate. So how does that suggest a long term problem and a fringe playoff team overall? If anything it suggests once we start hitting our shots and fix what is broken we are freight train that will only gain steam.
bluethunder0005 wrote:winforlose wrote:bluethunder0005 wrote:Lot of players are talking about how much they hate the new basketball and how it's hurting shooting. In general, awful loss last night but it's realistically what teams of the Wolves caliber will do being a fringe playoff team. Capable of beating everyone like the Bucks a few nights ago but also losing to anyone like the Pelicans and Magic. It's disappointing because we always want to see our team beat the less talented teams but let's be real, even if this team played up to it's potential every night, it's no more than a 45ish win team.
Please help me understand this take. Last season we ducked because our defense was not up to snuff and because we lost KAT for 22 games early and we couldn’t compensate. This season our defense has improved, and Ant is supposed to be far enough along to help take the burden off of KAT. You have Prince, Beasley, Dlo, MCD, JMAC, and Ant all shooting below their numbers last season and their career numbers. In some cases by more than 20%. We are missing open 3s at an alarming rate. So how does that suggest a long term problem and a fringe playoff team overall? If anything it suggests once we start hitting our shots and fix what is broken we are freight train that will only gain steam.
Do you see this team as a top 4 in the West? Anything below that to me is fringe, in that a few games here or there one way or the other could be the difference between 6 seed or having to be the playin. Those guys are likely shooting so poorly because of the new ball, which is bothering everyone. I doubt are players are going to get back to their career norms if they are playing with a ball that isn't conductive to that and if the league switches to something else then other teams will start making their shots and our defense will fall back down, granted not to the level it was last year.
Chello1 wrote:This is not an overreaction: this team is not a good team. You will never win with KAT as your best player. ANT is going to take time to develop and there are no guarantees he will be a true superstar. The rest of the team is not good..... Jaden may develop but he looks like he could be a middling player at best who defends but is a liability on offense. People who said they wouldn't trade him for Simmons are delusional. Sorry if I don't get hyped about a win over Milwaukee with two starters out.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
winforlose wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:winforlose wrote:
We are getting open 3s because teams are collapsing in the paint and forcing us to shoot outside. We have a team of guys whose career numbers are better than their season numbers and six games in you are saying they suck.
I wish it was only for 6 games. But no, not at all.
Almost 2 years now tbh. Healthy, not healthy, this is not a great team. Is a bunch of individualities that don't fit each other at all and never will. Is not a matter of figuring out with these guys.
The team needs a massive adjustment around KAT-Edwards.
Yes, we are still going to win a bunch of games, but I seriously doubt that is going to be enough to get to the playoffs.
This is a definition of a treadmill team. So, don't try to pretend this is an overreaction after 6 games.
Not for me, and definitely not for FOYE as well.
So to be clear Dlo shooting a career low this season is the new normal? So Beasley shooting a career low is the new normal. Jaden McDaniels struggles including a 20% drop in 3 point shooting is normal? So Karl not shooting enough is normal? I could go on and on. The defense looks better because the guys are more bought in. The shooting not showing up is a function of missing open shots. You can say that we are missing them because we are bad at shooting but I ask you to consider the history of the shooters. Is that really so unreasonable?
Wolf_Cry wrote:winforlose wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:
I wish it was only for 6 games. But no, not at all.
Almost 2 years now tbh. Healthy, not healthy, this is not a great team. Is a bunch of individualities that don't fit each other at all and never will. Is not a matter of figuring out with these guys.
The team needs a massive adjustment around KAT-Edwards.
Yes, we are still going to win a bunch of games, but I seriously doubt that is going to be enough to get to the playoffs.
This is a definition of a treadmill team. So, don't try to pretend this is an overreaction after 6 games.
Not for me, and definitely not for FOYE as well.
So to be clear Dlo shooting a career low this season is the new normal? So Beasley shooting a career low is the new normal. Jaden McDaniels struggles including a 20% drop in 3 point shooting is normal? So Karl not shooting enough is normal? I could go on and on. The defense looks better because the guys are more bought in. The shooting not showing up is a function of missing open shots. You can say that we are missing them because we are bad at shooting but I ask you to consider the history of the shooters. Is that really so unreasonable?
Therein lies the problem though. Even if they're all shooting below their career percentage- the fact still remains this team is full of extremely streaky shooters. Beas and DLo in particular will have 1 or 2 games where they go 6/10 from down time, followed by 5-6 games of just putrid shooting. Then the whole thing recycles itself.
If a team wants to compete for a play in (not even play offs) spot, they need consistency. Streaky shooters do have their places in the league and can be valuable....but mainly as a 6th man. It's the spot I envision for either DLo or Beasley as both are perfect for it.
Ultimately, as you said by the law of averages, this team should start shooting better, but the pattern of when still remains a big problem. I don't care if by the end of the season the team is shooting 40% total from 3 point land if that means they have 6-7 games where they shooting 20% and 1 or 2 games where they shoot 50%. Give me consistency.
KG_Wolves wrote:Unacceptable loss this team is full of gutless pigs who are injury prone.
I am ready to blow this **** up and start over.
Note30 wrote:This is the last season this **** can continue. If there aren't any definitive changes this season, blow it to shreds, not sure how we can do that tho. We're already so bad that blowing it to shreds means nothing.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:People like to bash on Russell, but the team had a 5-point lead when he went out for the game. They lost by 18.
Russell +15
McLaughlin -23
That's the difference.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves