moss_is_1 wrote:Wolveswin wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:Lol @ trading KAT because of this game.
I'm 100% on the trade Beasley. Nowell is better. Only thing Beasley does better is shoot, but he takes so many dumbass shots. Nowell can shoot, but when his shot isn't falling he can drive, pass, moves the ball well
Of course you don’t trade KAT because of this game. Much deeper than that.
How much are you willing to attach to Beasley to make him not negative and actually make a trade that improves the team?
We aren't trading KAT. I don't like him sometimes either, but he made some key plays down the stretch, mostly on defense. He was rusty shooting the ball but that's to be expected. If we trade him we go into yet another rebuild, it's not happening.
That isn’t the only option in trading Towns - going scorched earth.
Towns might be Wolves most valuable asset. He also could be on a ticking clock timeline. He also could not be perfect or even great fit with Edwards. That last point has been debated within many game threads.
Towns is also a center and a non-traditional one at that. Wolves have tried for 7 years building around such a player as Towns.
Add all that up and yes Towns should be trade candidate. Does the mean being shopped or on the block? Probably not. But not untouchable as they say.
Can Towns, arguably Wolves best asset, be used to build a better roster? If the answer is yes, start building. Find a equitable trade and pull the trigger when satisfied.