Clyde_Style wrote:El Poochio wrote:Chanel is the J Jonah Jameson of this board
With balding pate, shoeshine mustache and sideburns too?
More stylish version
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
Clyde_Style wrote:El Poochio wrote:Chanel is the J Jonah Jameson of this board
With balding pate, shoeshine mustache and sideburns too?

El Poochio wrote:Chanel is the J Jonah Jameson of this board
Chanel Bomber wrote:El Poochio wrote:Chanel is the J Jonah Jameson of this board
I wish I got the reference (I really don't).
I could also be just a bottle of Jameson.
Chanel Bomber wrote:El Poochio wrote:Chanel is the J Jonah Jameson of this board
I wish I got the reference (I really don't).
I could also be just a bottle of Jameson.


Clyde_Style wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
You need to show consistency to be a franchise player.
That's what season averages (i.e., a large sample size) are there to show. And those numbers show that he hasn't been good at all this year, despite a handful of great performances.
RJ had arguably the two best games of his career in the past week, so hopefully it's a sign of things to come. But he can't follow up one good game with two stinkers every time. So let's re-assess his game in February or so.
He had never looked this comfortable as a shot creator until this Spurs game, so let's hope this game is something he can build on. It can't be understated that he's looked better without Randle on the court too.
You eat stats for breakfast so what are his last six games? Wasn’t it something like 3 good games, followed by one mediocre game with a game winning shot and then two good games again? For the NBA that’s more than a hot hand, but probably consistency even for the best players. It’s taken from an admittedly small swath of games, but he has been good for more than a week now.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
El Poochio wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:El Poochio wrote:Chanel is the J Jonah Jameson of this board
I wish I got the reference (I really don't).
I could also be just a bottle of Jameson.
Look him up bro your new idol
Its either Knicks or RJ is Spiderman in this case I havent decided yet
thebuzzardman wrote:Free NY_Mentality!



Chanel Bomber wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:You need to show consistency to be a franchise player.
That's what season averages (i.e., a large sample size) are there to show. And those numbers show that he hasn't been good at all this year, despite a handful of great performances.
RJ had arguably the two best games of his career in the past week, so hopefully it's a sign of things to come. But he can't follow up one good game with two stinkers every time. So let's re-assess his game in February or so.
He had never looked this comfortable as a shot creator until this Spurs game, so let's hope this game is something he can build on. It can't be understated that he's looked better without Randle on the court too.
You eat stats for breakfast so what are his last six games? Wasn’t it something like 3 good games, followed by one mediocre game with a game winning shot and then two good games again? For the NBA that’s more than a hot hand, but probably consistency even for the best players. It’s taken from an admittedly small swath of games, but he has been good for more than a week now.
I don't have my machine of facts in front of me (the one that makes me the objective and cultured pundit that I am) but in the last 4 games, RJ had two great games, and two bad ones, game-winner aside.
His efficiency over the last week is right around league-average, which is progress, and which is encouraging since he's had more shot creation responsibilities.
But as you said, 4 games (or even 10 games) is a small sample-size. Tim Hardaway and KP both had hot stretches (KP's lasted a month) that turned out to be pretty flukey in the end.
HerSports85 wrote:Although all the criticism is warranted, I really hope Randle pulls it together and finish the year off strong.
He honestly didn’t have a horrible game, he moved the ball, set screens (even though they were lazy), and played better defense. Most importantly he wasn’t forcing up shots and let RJ do his thing.
In my opinion he was a net positive by staying out of the way.
I think if he had this game but didn’t come off like he was sulking and low energy it wouldn’t have been so bad.
Thibs also put him in a bad situation. No way he should be in with a 20+ lead with everything going on. Our coach has zero feel for real-time basketball.
Chanel Bomber wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:You need to show consistency to be a franchise player.
That's what season averages (i.e., a large sample size) are there to show. And those numbers show that he hasn't been good at all this year, despite a handful of great performances.
RJ had arguably the two best games of his career in the past week, so hopefully it's a sign of things to come. But he can't follow up one good game with two stinkers every time. So let's re-assess his game in February or so.
He had never looked this comfortable as a shot creator until this Spurs game, so let's hope this game is something he can build on. It can't be understated that he's looked better without Randle on the court too.
You eat stats for breakfast so what are his last six games? Wasn’t it something like 3 good games, followed by one mediocre game with a game winning shot and then two good games again? For the NBA that’s more than a hot hand, but probably consistency even for the best players. It’s taken from an admittedly small swath of games, but he has been good for more than a week now.
I don't have my machine of facts in front of me (the one that makes me the objective and cultured pundit that I am) but in the last 4 games, RJ had two great games, and two bad ones, game-winner aside.
His efficiency over the last week is right around league-average, which is progress, and which is encouraging since he's had more shot creation responsibilities.
But as you said, 4 games (or even 10 games) is a small sample-size. Tim Hardaway and KP both had hot stretches (KP's lasted a month) that turned out to be pretty flukey in the end.

Chanel Bomber wrote:4 games (or even 10 games) is a small sample-size. Tim Hardaway and KP both had hot stretches (KP's lasted a month) that turned out to be pretty flukey in the end.
JohnStarksTheDunk wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:4 games (or even 10 games) is a small sample-size. Tim Hardaway and KP both had hot stretches (KP's lasted a month) that turned out to be pretty flukey in the end.
I actually agree with you, but it's worth noting that RJ is averaging almost 20 ppg (19.6) since the beginning of December. He's still inconsistent as hell, but things have been trending in the right way. He went through an awful slump in November, but started to come around again before COVID protocols derailed things a bit. Seems like he's back on track again, so we'll see how he looks the 2nd half of the year.

Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid

Chanel Bomber wrote:The ideal would be to find a Randle trade that brings in either a low-usage stretch 4 or a stretch 5.
So then we can see more PNR action with Mitch or Obi as the roll man.
This ISO Randle madness has to stop. The league has adjusted, these possessions are not good for anybody.
for Turner. Indy might be a good place for him.Chanel Bomber wrote:The ideal would be to find a Randle trade that brings in either a low-usage stretch 4 or a stretch 5.
So then we can see more PNR action with Mitch or Obi as the roll man.
This ISO Randle madness has to stop. The league has adjusted, these possessions are not good for anybody.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles
Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.