Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 39,172
- And1: 36,932
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Option 1
Fox+Barnes+Hield for Simmons+Harris+Milton
Salaries are an exact match. Kings get bigger and better defensively on the wing. 76ers get Barnes to replace some of Simmons defense on wing plus some shooting and playmaking.
Fox, Curry, Green, Barnes, Embiid -- Maxey, Hield, Thybulle, Niang, Drummond -- Springer, Joe, Korkmaz, Bassey, Reed
Davion, Hali, Simmons, Harris, Holmes -- TD2, Milton, Harkless, Bagley, Len -- Ramsey, Woodard, Metu, TT, Jones
Option 2
Hali+Barnes+Hield+Bagley+TT for Simmons+Harris+Milton+Reed+Joe
Kings take on 6m more in this trade. They stay under tax though. This trade also enables 76ers to dip under the tax.
Min difference to option 1 is that Kings send Hali+TT+Bagley instead of Fox and in return they get a few young players in Joe+Reed.
Curry, Hali, Green, Barnes, Embiid -- Maxey, Hield, Thybulle, Bagley, Drummond -- Springer, Korkmaz, Niang, Bassey, TT
Fox, TD2, Simmons, Harris, Holmes -- Joe, Milton, Harkless, Reed, Len -- Ramsey, Woodard, Metu, TT, Jones
Fox+Barnes+Hield for Simmons+Harris+Milton
Salaries are an exact match. Kings get bigger and better defensively on the wing. 76ers get Barnes to replace some of Simmons defense on wing plus some shooting and playmaking.
Fox, Curry, Green, Barnes, Embiid -- Maxey, Hield, Thybulle, Niang, Drummond -- Springer, Joe, Korkmaz, Bassey, Reed
Davion, Hali, Simmons, Harris, Holmes -- TD2, Milton, Harkless, Bagley, Len -- Ramsey, Woodard, Metu, TT, Jones
Option 2
Hali+Barnes+Hield+Bagley+TT for Simmons+Harris+Milton+Reed+Joe
Kings take on 6m more in this trade. They stay under tax though. This trade also enables 76ers to dip under the tax.
Min difference to option 1 is that Kings send Hali+TT+Bagley instead of Fox and in return they get a few young players in Joe+Reed.
Curry, Hali, Green, Barnes, Embiid -- Maxey, Hield, Thybulle, Bagley, Drummond -- Springer, Korkmaz, Niang, Bassey, TT
Fox, TD2, Simmons, Harris, Holmes -- Joe, Milton, Harkless, Reed, Len -- Ramsey, Woodard, Metu, TT, Jones
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 13,553
- And1: 10,339
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
The 1st one is better for the Kings, but if I'm the Sixers, I'd insist on the 2nd one.
blicka wrote:Can't wait to see doncic on an island vs jimmy butler,paul george or kahwi leonard and those weak ass moves that work in europe getting shut down
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,993
- And1: 1,839
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
It's hard to say in a vacuum, without picks also being considered.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 39,172
- And1: 36,932
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
mcfly1204 wrote:It's hard to say in a vacuum, without picks also being considered.
Yeah this was meant to be without picks. What picks do you think need to be added?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,324
- And1: 1,762
- Joined: Jun 03, 2017
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
I don’t really care for either if I’m a SAC fan. Giving up a very good, young talent in Fox or Haliburton in exchange for a mentally soft guy in Simmons is nothing better than a “high risk/high reward” venture.
Then swap two relatively young, good players in Hield and Barnes for one of the most overpaid players in the league? No thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then swap two relatively young, good players in Hield and Barnes for one of the most overpaid players in the league? No thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,439
- And1: 17,581
- Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Slim Tubby wrote:I don’t really care for either if I’m a SAC fan. Giving up a very good, young talent in Fox or Haliburton in exchange for a mentally soft guy in Simmons is nothing better than a “high risk/high reward” venture.
Then swap two relatively young, good players in Hield and Barnes for one of the most overpaid players in the league? No thanks.
I think except the word out of Sacramento is they want to move Hield and Barnes. BTW, they're not really 'young' players either. Hield just turned 29, Barnes will be 30 before next season.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 39,172
- And1: 36,932
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Slacktard wrote:Slim Tubby wrote:I don’t really care for either if I’m a SAC fan. Giving up a very good, young talent in Fox or Haliburton in exchange for a mentally soft guy in Simmons is nothing better than a “high risk/high reward” venture.
Then swap two relatively young, good players in Hield and Barnes for one of the most overpaid players in the league? No thanks.
I think except the word out of Sacramento is they want to move Hield and Barnes. BTW, they're not really 'young' players either. Hield just turned 29, Barnes will be 30 before next season.
I do think Simmons has more value than Fox right now anyway. Not sure on Hali, perhaps equal, Hali is.younnger and has shown potential. His abilities would mesh well with 76ers. Maxey-Hali is a solid backcourt pairing.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,088
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
I don't see a Simmons trade where Fox doesn't go out, he doesn't have to go to Philly, but the Kings can't tie up the entirety of their cap space on 4 guys, three of whom can't shoot the ball. As it is, Barnes and Heild are two of the Kings better shooters.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,856
- And1: 5,830
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
I like the simple Fox/Simmons deal best. Adding in Heild/Barnes for Harris makes it more complicated - but it's still a better basis then the 2nd plan.
The Kings shouldn't consider any Haliburton for Simmons based deal given the downside risks of Simmons.
The Kings shouldn't consider any Haliburton for Simmons based deal given the downside risks of Simmons.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,703
- And1: 16,798
- Joined: Jul 06, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
If hail is getting traded I feel like maxey has to be in that deal
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 39,172
- And1: 36,932
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Ballerhogger wrote:If hail is getting traded I feel like maxey has to be in that deal
I think a Maxey-Hali backcourt would be ideal for Embiid. So I can see they'd try somehow. But yeah it'd be unlikely to have Harris.
Hali+Bagley+Hield for Simmons+Niang+Joe works
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,456
- And1: 3,423
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
I think the 1st offer is good for both, Kings have to pass on #2
Mitchell / Davis
Halliburton / Milton
Harris
Simmons / Metu
Holmes
Fox / Maxey
Curry / Hield
Thybulle / Green
Barnes / Niang
Embiid / Drummond
Biggest problems I see are Phillys back Court D being horrendous, and Kings having no functional bench. With Simmons/Holmes on the court, they really need to bring in shooting off the bench, 6 non shooting bigs Len/Jones/Thompson/Bagley/Ramsay/Woodard just won’t work.
Mitchell / Davis
Halliburton / Milton
Harris
Simmons / Metu
Holmes
Fox / Maxey
Curry / Hield
Thybulle / Green
Barnes / Niang
Embiid / Drummond
Biggest problems I see are Phillys back Court D being horrendous, and Kings having no functional bench. With Simmons/Holmes on the court, they really need to bring in shooting off the bench, 6 non shooting bigs Len/Jones/Thompson/Bagley/Ramsay/Woodard just won’t work.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,597
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jan 11, 2002
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
If I'm the Kings, I would try to keep Haliburton.
Also I'm not sure that the Kings need to add value to the Fox-Simmons swap. In vacuum Simmons is more valuable, but he has a heavier baggage as well.
Also I'm not sure that the Kings need to add value to the Fox-Simmons swap. In vacuum Simmons is more valuable, but he has a heavier baggage as well.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,448
- And1: 8,446
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
- Location: Philadelphia(ish)
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
zimpy27 wrote:Slacktard wrote:Slim Tubby wrote:I don’t really care for either if I’m a SAC fan. Giving up a very good, young talent in Fox or Haliburton in exchange for a mentally soft guy in Simmons is nothing better than a “high risk/high reward” venture.
Then swap two relatively young, good players in Hield and Barnes for one of the most overpaid players in the league? No thanks.
I think except the word out of Sacramento is they want to move Hield and Barnes. BTW, they're not really 'young' players either. Hield just turned 29, Barnes will be 30 before next season.
I do think Simmons has more value than Fox right now anyway. Not sure on Hali, perhaps equal, Hali is.younnger and has shown potential. His abilities would mesh well with 76ers. Maxey-Hali is a solid backcourt pairing.
Haliburton is a nice, young player that any team would love to have... But I'm not sure how much potential is there. I'd be shocked if he turned into an all star caliber player. I think Morey would want some pretty significant assets on top of him in a Simmons deal, mostly with the thought of trying to flip the package in the summer.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,584
- And1: 536
- Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Ballerhogger wrote:If hail is getting traded I feel like maxey has to be in that deal
Lol no shot Maxey goes in either Deal.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,420
- And1: 2,170
- Joined: Nov 07, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
I assume the same goes for Haliburton, hence the statement by them to have Maxey included.PhillyNj wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:If hail is getting traded I feel like maxey has to be in that deal
Lol no shot Maxey goes in either Deal.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
- Lovetron Joe
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,146
- And1: 482
- Joined: Dec 26, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Tukkerwolf wrote:I assume the same goes for Haliburton, hence the statement by them to have Maxey included.PhillyNj wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:If hail is getting traded I feel like maxey has to be in that deal
Lol no shot Maxey goes in either Deal.
Simmons is the best player in the deal by a healthy margin. If Sac has to move Hali to get him, they will. Maxey stays in Philly.
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,703
- And1: 16,798
- Joined: Jul 06, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Tukkerwolf wrote:I assume the same goes for Haliburton, hence the statement by them to have Maxey included.PhillyNj wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:If hail is getting traded I feel like maxey has to be in that deal
Lol no shot Maxey goes in either Deal.
Exactly
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,703
- And1: 16,798
- Joined: Jul 06, 2014
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Lovetron Joe wrote:Tukkerwolf wrote:I assume the same goes for Haliburton, hence the statement by them to have Maxey included.PhillyNj wrote:Lol no shot Maxey goes in either Deal.
Simmons is the best player in the deal by a healthy margin. If Sac has to move Hali to get him, they will. Maxey stays in Philly.
The man is finshed product lacks the work ethic to get better . Cant be your go to scorer , hasn’t played a nba minute for how ?
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,836
- And1: 2,029
- Joined: Apr 10, 2001
Re: Which Simmons+Harris trade to Kings is better?
Ballerhogger wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:Tukkerwolf wrote:I assume the same goes for Haliburton, hence the statement by them to have Maxey included.
Simmons is the best player in the deal by a healthy margin. If Sac has to move Hali to get him, they will. Maxey stays in Philly.
The man is finshed product lacks the work ethic to get better . Cant be your go to scorer , hasn’t played a nba minute for how ?
Finished product of a 25-year old All Star with elite distribution and defense still seems like decent finished product despite the drawbacks, no?
GDTBATH
Return to Trades and Transactions