720 wrote:One thing worth noting, Hornet's are apparently on a 8 game losing streak when Hayward doesn't play. That along with the early game ejection they're not looking as good as they could be.
That streak extended as of now. Game.
Blouses.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
720 wrote:One thing worth noting, Hornet's are apparently on a 8 game losing streak when Hayward doesn't play. That along with the early game ejection they're not looking as good as they could be.
KL78192020 wrote:FVV exposed tonight!
Los_29 wrote:Trade Scottie and Fred. Build around Gary and Pascal.
HumbleRen wrote:KL78192020 wrote:FVV exposed tonight!
Goes both ways, the team also defers when FVV is on the court, barely moving when they don't have the ball. They can keep the ball moving like they did tonight with FVV easily imo.
PrinceAli wrote:Crazy how much better the ball movement is when Fred doesn’t play
Los_29 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:KL78192020 wrote:FVV exposed tonight!
Goes both ways, the team also defers when FVV is on the court, barely moving when they don't have the ball. They can keep the ball moving like they did tonight with FVV easily imo.
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Madhouse wrote:PrinceAli wrote:Crazy how much better the ball movement is when Fred doesn’t play
Time to sell high
Los_29 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:KL78192020 wrote:FVV exposed tonight!
Goes both ways, the team also defers when FVV is on the court, barely moving when they don't have the ball. They can keep the ball moving like they did tonight with FVV easily imo.
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
TRik wrote:Los_29 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Goes both ways, the team also defers when FVV is on the court, barely moving when they don't have the ball. They can keep the ball moving like they did tonight with FVV easily imo.
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Yeah, definitely truth to hitting shots and not. But surely you can also concede the team looks better with more ball movement and assists.
Ref_from_hell wrote:TRik wrote:Los_29 wrote:
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Yeah, definitely truth to hitting shots and not. But surely you can also concede the team looks better with more ball movement and assists.
It's also true that it's just one game and we were 4-18 without him going into this game over the past two seasons. Not to mention the ridiculous point differential with him on and off the court this year. So do we just wash that away?
Don't get me wrong we played great tonight and the ball was humming but people are jumping to ridiculous conclusions over a one-game sample size
HumbleRen wrote:Los_29 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Goes both ways, the team also defers when FVV is on the court, barely moving when they don't have the ball. They can keep the ball moving like they did tonight with FVV easily imo.
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Don't look at the numbers, just use your eyes lol. Our ball movement was completely different, we don't normally play that way.
Our offence against Portland was very stagnant.
HumbleRen wrote:Los_29 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Goes both ways, the team also defers when FVV is on the court, barely moving when they don't have the ball. They can keep the ball moving like they did tonight with FVV easily imo.
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Don't look at the numbers, just use your eyes lol. Our ball movement was completely different, we don't normally play that way.
Our offence against Portland was very stagnant.


pingpongrac wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Los_29 wrote:
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Don't look at the numbers, just use your eyes lol. Our ball movement was completely different, we don't normally play that way.
Our offence against Portland was very stagnant.
It was pretty stagnant against Portland, but we still generated a ton of open shots on the perimeter especially. Against the Blazers, OG+GTJ+Boucher went 7/18 on open threes (8/23 overall) and tonight they went 10/20 overall. Additionally, Banton+Flynn+Yuta came into this game shooting a combined 2/11 on open threes in January while they went 5/8 in non-garbage time tonight. If we shot like we did against the Blazers, there likely wouldn't be all of this ball movement talk because people only tend to see the final result (missed shots) and forget about all of the good that came before.
Los_29 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Los_29 wrote:
I think you're overthinking this. We shot nearly 50% from three, 52% from the field. Without Fred and Scottie, we'd lose against this Charlotte team more often than not. However, tonight we just made our shots. On Sunday, we'd beat that Portland team more often than not. We just didn't hit our shots. That's the nature of the NBA. It's why we saw a shorthanded Pacers team beat the Warriors.
Don't look at the numbers, just use your eyes lol. Our ball movement was completely different, we don't normally play that way.
Our offence against Portland was very stagnant.
There is no doubt we played a sloppy, uninspired game against Portland. That's for sure. But ball movement looks a lot better when shots are falling and the opposing team isn't playing any defense. Against Portland, 4 of our starters were absolutely atrocious. Very rarely do you have games like that.
We all know what kind of impact Fred makes on this team. A Dalano Banton/Malachi Flynn point guard duo is unlikely to be this productive over the course of a season given what we have seen from them this year.
It's just what this message board does though. Gets overly excited about wins and overreacts to losses.
KL78192020 wrote:pingpongrac wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Don't look at the numbers, just use your eyes lol. Our ball movement was completely different, we don't normally play that way.
Our offence against Portland was very stagnant.
It was pretty stagnant against Portland, but we still generated a ton of open shots on the perimeter especially. Against the Blazers, OG+GTJ+Boucher went 7/18 on open threes (8/23 overall) and tonight they went 10/20 overall. Additionally, Banton+Flynn+Yuta came into this game shooting a combined 2/11 on open threes in January while they went 5/8 in non-garbage time tonight. If we shot like we did against the Blazers, there likely wouldn't be all of this ball movement talk because people only tend to see the final result (missed shots) and forget about all of the good that came before.
But they are making those shots because there is much better ball movement without FVV. Not like FVV running around dribbling the ball for 20 seconds and someone else has to take a bailout shot and misses. Thats why FVV causes issues, tonight was one of the best displays of offense the team has shown all season.
