raleigh wrote:Off-day question...
If Huerter + non-lotto pick(s) could get you Johnny Davis, would you do it?
I'd be lying if I said I knew who Johnny Davis was. Don't follow college bbal.
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
raleigh wrote:Off-day question...
If Huerter + non-lotto pick(s) could get you Johnny Davis, would you do it?
jayu70 wrote:raleigh wrote:Off-day question...
If Huerter + non-lotto pick(s) could get you Johnny Davis, would you do it?
I'd be lying if I said I knew who Johnny Davis was. Don't follow college bbal.


raleigh wrote:Off-day question...
If Huerter + non-lotto pick(s) could get you Johnny Davis, would you do it?


Several months ago I said on the General Board that I expect Poole to receive max money. He's proven that he will now. I'd be all for pursuing him but Golden State needs to do what it takes to keep him.Jamaaliver wrote:I ask again, any interest in pursuing this kid this summer?
GS can't afford to keep everyone...


Geaux_Hawks wrote:We do need another star though. Would be such a waste of a great career if we didn't bring another player similar to or better than Trae.Many may not like it, but an in-shape Zion would be about as good of an aqcuisition as any out there that's available in within reach for us trade wise. That duo with a lot of good defenders around them would be lethal.
Jamaaliver wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:We do need another star though. Would be such a waste of a great career if we didn't bring another player similar to or better than Trae.Many may not like it, but an in-shape Zion would be about as good of an aqcuisition as any out there that's available in within reach for us trade wise. That duo with a lot of good defenders around them would be lethal.
Zion would indeed be a worthy gamble.
I'd also consider other talented but damaged big men like Rudy Gobert, Ben Simmons and Anthony Davis.
Gobert or Simmons could thrive with our stable of shooters and a playmaker as talented as Trae. (Gobert in particular could see his scoring double catching lobs from TY and getting offensive putbacks.)
Anthony Davis would just be a beast next to Okongwu. We'd need a reliable backup big man cause they both get injured frequently.
Geaux_Hawks wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:We do need another star though. Would be such a waste of a great career if we didn't bring another player similar to or better than Trae.Many may not like it, but an in-shape Zion would be about as good of an aqcuisition as any out there that's available in within reach for us trade wise. That duo with a lot of good defenders around them would be lethal.
Zion would indeed be a worthy gamble.
I'd also consider other talented but damaged big men like Rudy Gobert, Ben Simmons and Anthony Davis.
Gobert or Simmons could thrive with our stable of shooters and a playmaker as talented as Trae. (Gobert in particular could see his scoring double catching lobs from TY and getting offensive putbacks.)
Anthony Davis would just be a beast next to Okongwu. We'd need a reliable backup big man cause they both get injured frequently.
Simmons would indeed be perfect imo. Not sure what the Nets plan to do wit him. I assume they want him as long as he wants to be t here.
I'd consider AD as well. Gobert is just a no for me. We wouldn't really get more than what we already have other than his insane length on defense.
jayu70 wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:
Zion would indeed be a worthy gamble.
I'd also consider other talented but damaged big men like Rudy Gobert, Ben Simmons and Anthony Davis.
Gobert or Simmons could thrive with our stable of shooters and a playmaker as talented as Trae. (Gobert in particular could see his scoring double catching lobs from TY and getting offensive putbacks.)
Anthony Davis would just be a beast next to Okongwu. We'd need a reliable backup big man cause they both get injured frequently.
Simmons would indeed be perfect imo. Not sure what the Nets plan to do wit him. I assume they want him as long as he wants to be t here.
I'd consider AD as well. Gobert is just a no for me. We wouldn't really get more than what we already have other than his insane length on defense.
?s=20&t=TfGBzyryZGlUqKx9Gq3-fQ

leo7 wrote:If Hawks can't get AD, who would be the next best player that the Hawks can get? Maybe Randle if the Knicks want to move on?
Jamaaliver wrote:leo7 wrote:If Hawks can't get AD, who would be the next best player that the Hawks can get? Maybe Randle if the Knicks want to move on?Spoiler:
leo7 wrote:If Hawks can't get AD, who would be the next best player that the Hawks can get? Maybe Randle if the Knicks want to move on?