islandboy53 wrote:douggood wrote:islandboy53 wrote:
Maybe, but why? The contract flexibility of #33 more than offsets the slight increase in talent that may be available by trading up into the late 1st. Throwing additional assets in to do that seems a waste.
same reason other teams trade up or down, if there is someone you like and you dont think will be there at 33. or vice versa if there is someone you like who will be avalaible later and get a sweetener for moving down.
I understand the concept, thanks. Do you see anyone this year who is sufficiently better at, say, 27 versus 33, that you would spend a future second and cash on? And give a guaranteed contract/roster spot to rather than sign to a 2 way spot?
thats not for me or us to know, that all depends on the raptors draft board. if someone they have ranked 20th drops to lets say 27, then its worth it to move from 33 to 27 if their internal reports shows that player wont be avalaible at 33.
also players picked in the 33 pick range dont sign 2way deals. they sign 4 year deals, but the downside of pick 33 vs lets say 27, after 4 years the player is UFA vs RFA if its a first rounder. see jalen brunson, he is ufa this offseason, was the 33rd pick. while the 24th pick of the same year anferenee simons is rfa.
no rumors of simons leaving portland, but lots of rumors of brunson leaving.