ImageImage

OT: TV and Movies

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,125
And1: 4,550
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1321 » by BUCKnation » Tue May 10, 2022 2:28 pm

MikeIsGood wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Doctor Strange was kind of fun because of Raimi’s influence but once again reinforces my issue with Marvel in general.

Endgame was the end of the story. All of these follow ups are superfluous and quite simply money grabs. There’s no sense of tension and there’s no feeling that these movies are building to anything. Doesn’t help that Strange is also on the very bottom tier of interesting Marvel characters.


Even the new Marvel shows have been kinda meh, especially compared to some of the Netflix Marvel shows of the past.

I'm excited for some of the darker characters they want to explore (Blade, Daredevil again, Moon Knight, Ghost Rider) but afraid they'll turn each property into another cookie cutter Marvel production.


I'm not up on MCU like many of you likely are, but I did think Wandavision was incredible. Now, that said, I'm an X-Men guy, and even though she's been cast as part of the Avengers in the current timeline, it still had that adjacency interest for me. Though the teases they did with Quicksilver were mean.

Along these lines, can someone spoil for me why we see Prof X's chair in the trailer for the new Dr Strange movie? Any hope I can grab onto, or just them being mean again?

If you really want to know.

Spoiler:
Patrick stewart does play a role in the movie
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,125
And1: 4,550
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1322 » by BUCKnation » Tue May 10, 2022 2:32 pm

I really enjoyed Doctor Strange and a lot of the new stuff. Them getting the rights from fox was pretty huge. Only issue I have is the whole marvel feel to everything that kind of holds movies back. It's hard to explain sometimes, but in Doctor Strange for example, there were a lot of horror elements but it never really had that sense of dread, b/c after all it is a marvel movie. Shang Chi, I thought was awesome, but then the super CGI ending and a few other things, while not ruining the movie, took away from what was a really good, street level, story.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 37,217
And1: 27,391
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1323 » by Matches Malone » Tue May 10, 2022 2:37 pm

MikeIsGood wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Doctor Strange was kind of fun because of Raimi’s influence but once again reinforces my issue with Marvel in general.

Endgame was the end of the story. All of these follow ups are superfluous and quite simply money grabs. There’s no sense of tension and there’s no feeling that these movies are building to anything. Doesn’t help that Strange is also on the very bottom tier of interesting Marvel characters.


Even the new Marvel shows have been kinda meh, especially compared to some of the Netflix Marvel shows of the past.

I'm excited for some of the darker characters they want to explore (Blade, Daredevil again, Moon Knight, Ghost Rider) but afraid they'll turn each property into another cookie cutter Marvel production.


I'm not up on MCU like many of you likely are, but I did think Wandavision was incredible. Now, that said, I'm an X-Men guy, and even though she's been cast as part of the Avengers in the current timeline, it still had that adjacency interest for me. Though the teases they did with Quicksilver were mean.

Along these lines, can someone spoil for me why we see Prof X's chair in the trailer for the new Dr Strange movie? Any hope I can grab onto, or just them being mean again?


I have a feeling X-men will be a major part of Marvel films moving forward. Wouldn't be surprised if they had their own universe under Kevin Fiege that resembles more of the 90's cartoon we loved as kids and they can mingle with the other Avengers.

As for the Dr. Strange thing,
Spoiler:
it sounds like they are variants? I haven't seen the movie yet, but from what I've read, it sounds mostly like fan service (Fans have been fancasting Krasinski as Reed Richards for decades now). So it was a way to get them into the universe, but they don't necessarily have to use that version of Reed Richards if they ever want to do a Fantastic Four movie since it's a "multiverse"? My guess is if they do some sort of Secret Wars storyline, they'll have versions of characters from all over the place/timeline. Think Spiderman No Way Home, but x100.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 37,217
And1: 27,391
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1324 » by Matches Malone » Tue May 10, 2022 3:42 pm

New Giannis movie Trailer

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,128
And1: 41,650
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1325 » by emunney » Tue May 10, 2022 4:57 pm

HAMBONE VERSIMILITUDE ALERT

Dad from PEN15 was a good casting choice.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,183
And1: 8,561
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1326 » by buckboy » Tue May 10, 2022 5:15 pm

Taylor Nichols phone meme please.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
HurricaneKid
General Manager
Posts: 8,093
And1: 5,052
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: Sconnie Nation
 

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1327 » by HurricaneKid » Wed May 11, 2022 6:28 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Doctor Strange was kind of fun because of Raimi’s influence but once again reinforces my issue with Marvel in general.

Endgame was the end of the story. All of these follow ups are superfluous and quite simply money grabs. There’s no sense of tension and there’s no feeling that these movies are building to anything. Doesn’t help that Strange is also on the very bottom tier of interesting Marvel characters.
The problem is the impermanence. There are no stakes when you can turn back time or just pop over to a new universe.

I liked the Dr Strange movie more than I expected. I loved Shang Chi. Eternals was pretty forgettable and Black Widow was years late and out of place.

At the end of the day, they want to do big things in the stories then be able to wipe the slate clean. There doesn't seem to be an acknowledgment that having and regularly using a big eraser like that impacts the stakes so heavily.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
fishnc wrote:If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and LeBron, I would shoot LeBron twice.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,504
And1: 42,679
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1328 » by ReasonablySober » Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 pm

Just ordered two tickets for my brother and I to see the earliest possible showing of the new Top Gun. Two weeks is entirely too many weeks to wait to see this movie.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,927
And1: 57,050
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1329 » by MickeyDavis » Fri May 13, 2022 1:07 am

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,834
And1: 5,627
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1330 » by drew881 » Fri May 13, 2022 2:14 am

emunney wrote:HAMBONE VERSIMILITUDE ALERT

Dad from PEN15 was a good casting choice.


Such method acting prep for this role that he actually was the GM of the Bucks 2008-2017.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,504
And1: 42,679
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1331 » by ReasonablySober » Fri May 13, 2022 3:26 am

Read on Twitter


Oh hell yea.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,064
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1332 » by Badgerlander » Sat May 14, 2022 2:35 pm

Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,948
And1: 5,156
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1333 » by WRau1 » Mon May 16, 2022 2:07 pm

The Always Sunny Podcast is so good, this past episode was especially great.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,128
And1: 41,650
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1334 » by emunney » Mon May 16, 2022 3:15 pm

Hey why do the Jurassic Park dinosaurs look worse in the Dominion promos than they did in Jurassic Park?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
Siefer
RealGM
Posts: 16,473
And1: 6,981
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
     

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1335 » by Siefer » Mon May 16, 2022 4:40 pm

emunney wrote:Hey why do the Jurassic Park dinosaurs look worse in the Dominion promos than they did in Jurassic Park?


Yeah, the CGI looks terrible in the previews. There is an epidemic of terrible CGI in even top tier media these days (looking at you, Disney), and I think a lot of if it has to do with how things move in space. The renders are often great on their own, but they're deployed haphazardly, with no regard to how things actually move, or what mass actually is, so things (especially bodies) look cartoony and weightless.

YouTube doesn't do the colors/contrast justice, but Gareth Edwards is on the short list when it comes to CGI motion and weight.



And if you're feeling fiesty, a lot of modern CGI/animation owes a ton to this scene from End of Evangelion. GOAT portrayal of weight and scale. It's basically the reason Pacific Rim exists.

User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,332
And1: 44,669
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1336 » by Prez » Mon May 16, 2022 4:58 pm

I liked how Dr. Strange 2 had some darker, almost horror-like elements at times, unsurprising with Raimi directing.

But to me it’s just a difficult transition to those movies after you watch something like The Batman. Not even saying the Batman was a masterpiece (it wasn’t), but it was so well shot, so gritty and unafraid to get really dark that going back to the almost cartoon-y vibe of MCU movies is tough. Not to say they aren’t a fun time but the difference is glaring.

Said it several times already but we need more Daredevil type content in the MCU where they just don’t hold back in terms of violence, themes and tone. Haven’t seen Moon Knight, maybe that’s close? Idk.
User avatar
machu46
RealGM
Posts: 11,052
And1: 4,388
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: DC
       

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1337 » by machu46 » Mon May 16, 2022 5:19 pm

Prez wrote:I liked how Dr. Strange 2 had some darker, almost horror-like elements at times, unsurprising with Raimi directing.

But to me it’s just a difficult transition to those movies after you watch something like The Batman. Not even saying the Batman was a masterpiece (it wasn’t), but it was so well shot, so gritty and unafraid to get really dark that going back to the almost cartoon-y vibe of MCU movies is tough. Not to say they aren’t a fun time but the difference is glaring.

Said it several times already but we need more Daredevil type content in the MCU where they just don’t hold back in terms of violence, themes and tone. Haven’t seen Moon Knight, maybe that’s close? Idk.

Moon Knight is definitely not Daredevil unfortunately. The new Strange movie was more violent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,125
And1: 4,550
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1338 » by BUCKnation » Mon May 16, 2022 8:43 pm

Prez wrote:I liked how Dr. Strange 2 had some darker, almost horror-like elements at times, unsurprising with Raimi directing.

But to me it’s just a difficult transition to those movies after you watch something like The Batman. Not even saying the Batman was a masterpiece (it wasn’t), but it was so well shot, so gritty and unafraid to get really dark that going back to the almost cartoon-y vibe of MCU movies is tough. Not to say they aren’t a fun time but the difference is glaring.

Said it several times already but we need more Daredevil type content in the MCU where they just don’t hold back in terms of violence, themes and tone. Haven’t seen Moon Knight, maybe that’s close? Idk.

It was supposed to be even darker or more horror themed then the studio stepped in a bit, iirc. I think it's the color grading or something, b/c I had the same thought. Maybe it was b/c, at the end of the day, a marvel movie, but I never really felt that dread or weariness that something like a recent james wan or ari aster film would do. Raimi did his best given what he could though and I enjoyed it.
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,821
And1: 29,624
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1339 » by blazza18 » Mon May 16, 2022 11:27 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,504
And1: 42,679
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: OT: TV and Movies 

Post#1340 » by ReasonablySober » Mon May 16, 2022 11:34 pm

Return to Milwaukee Bucks