ciueli wrote:I don't understand the Celtic's strategy here, letting Curry run wild is not working for them, they should be easily winning this series and it's 2-2 with GS regaining home court advantage.
GS only has one primary ball handler, Steph Curry. If you take the ball out of his hands the Warriors are dead in the water, who is going to run the offence? Seems like a no-brainer that if the opposing team has exactly one decent PG/initiator/creator on their entire team you would just trap the hell out of that guy and force other players to make plays.
Well you're forgetting that Draymond Green leads the team in assists both in the playoffs and the regular season. Part of what the Celtics are doing is making Draymond irrelevant. As much as people want to clown Draymond, part of the Celtics method has been to neutralize his effectiveness. If Draymond isn't a ball handler he has almost no value on offense, hence him having to hit the pine at some point.
I'd play very different defenses vs. us when Draymond is in vs. when he is out. When he's in I think it makes sense not to double Steph which lets Robert Williams be a free roamer. If the ball is Draymond's hands as it usually is when Steph is getting doubled, Draymond has value on the offensive end and is playable the whole game for us. It's been really good for the Celtics to neutralize the Draymond minutes... however they need to switch it up when Draymond is out.